What are the management options for myelofibrosis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 24, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management of Myelofibrosis

Management of myelofibrosis is fundamentally determined by risk stratification using DIPSS-Plus scoring, with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) being the only curative option for intermediate-2 and high-risk patients, while ruxolitinib serves as first-line therapy for symptomatic splenomegaly in non-transplant candidates. 1

Initial Risk Stratification

Risk assessment must be performed at diagnosis using the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS), with Dynamic IPSS-Plus (DIPSS-Plus) preferred for ongoing risk stratification throughout the disease course. 1, 2

  • DIPSS-Plus incorporates adverse prognostic factors including age >65 years, constitutional symptoms, hemoglobin <10 g/dL, white blood cell count >25 × 10^9/L, peripheral blood blasts ≥1%, platelet count <100 × 10^9/L, unfavorable karyotype, and transfusion dependency 3
  • Risk categories are: Low (risk score 0), Intermediate-1 (INT-1, score 1-2), Intermediate-2 (INT-2, score 3-4), and High (score 5-6) 1
  • Additional high-risk mutations (ASXL1, EZH2, IDH1/IDH2, SRSF2) should be assessed as they adversely affect survival and inform transplant decisions 1, 3

Management by Risk Category

Low-Risk Disease (Risk Score 0)

Asymptomatic low-risk patients should be observed with monitoring every 3-6 months for disease progression. 1, 2

  • For symptomatic patients, assess symptom burden using MPN-SAF TSS-10 items 1
  • Treatment options include ruxolitinib or interferons (interferon alfa-2b, pegylated interferon alpha-2a, pegylated interferon alpha-2b) 1
  • Clinical trial enrollment should be considered 1

Intermediate-1 Risk Disease

INT-1 patients who are asymptomatic should be observed, while symptomatic patients should receive ruxolitinib. 1, 2

  • Observation with monitoring every 3-6 months is appropriate for asymptomatic patients 1
  • Ruxolitinib is recommended for symptomatic patients with splenomegaly 1
  • Allogeneic HCT should be evaluated for INT-1 patients with low platelet counts (<100 × 10^9/L), complex cytogenetics, refractory transfusion-dependent anemia, peripheral blood blasts >2%, or high-risk mutations 1

Intermediate-2 and High-Risk Disease

All INT-2 and high-risk patients should be evaluated for allogeneic HCT, which is the only curative therapy and recommended for all transplant-eligible patients. 1, 2

For Transplant Candidates:

  • Allogeneic HCT should be performed in transplant-eligible patients younger than 70 years with INT-2 or high-risk disease 1, 2, 3
  • Ruxolitinib is widely used for spleen reduction before transplantation 2
  • The transplant procedure should be performed in a controlled setting 1

For Non-Transplant Candidates:

  • Ruxolitinib is the first-line therapy for symptomatic splenomegaly in patients with platelets >50 × 10^9/L 1, 2
  • Ruxolitinib achieves spleen volume reduction ≥35% in approximately 60% of myelofibrosis patients and provides durable symptom control 4
  • Ruxolitinib improves overall survival in INT-2 or high-risk myelofibrosis compared to placebo and best available therapy 4, 2
  • For patients with platelets ≤50 × 10^9/L, clinical trial enrollment is preferred 1
  • Patients with symptomatic anemia only should be managed according to anemia-specific protocols 1

Management of Myelofibrosis-Associated Anemia

For anemia with hemoglobin <10 g/dL, treatment should be initiated based on erythropoietin levels and transfusion dependency. 1

  • Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents are first-line for patients with erythropoietin levels <125 mU/mL, producing improvements in 23-60% of patients 1
  • If no response after 3 months, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents should be stopped 1
  • Androgens (testosterone enanthate 400-600 mg weekly, oral fluoxymesterone 10 mg three times daily) or danazol 400-600 mg daily improve anemia in 30-60% of patients 1
  • Danazol should be maintained for at least 6 months, then progressively reduced to the minimum necessary dose 1
  • Low-dose thalidomide (50 mg/day) combined with prednisone (15-30 mg/day) provides 23-29% response rates 1
  • Lenalidomide combined with low-dose prednisone produces 19% response rates and is the treatment of choice for MF patients with 5q deletion 1
  • Corticosteroids alone (0.5-1.0 mg/kg/day) may be used for refractory anemia in patients unresponsive to other therapies 1

Special Considerations and Monitoring

Ruxolitinib-Specific Considerations

  • Ruxolitinib is effective independent of JAK2V617F, CALR, or MPL mutational status 2
  • The drug provides symptom control and reduces splenomegaly but does not eliminate the malignant clone 4
  • Only a minority of patients experience reduction in JAK2 allelic burden or improvement in bone marrow fibrosis with ruxolitinib monotherapy 4, 2
  • Myelosuppression is a common adverse effect that may limit use in patients with baseline cytopenias 4

Monitoring Requirements

  • Assess symptom burden at baseline using MPN Symptom Assessment Form (MPN-SAF-20 items) for all patients 1
  • Monitor for signs and symptoms of disease progression every 3-6 months 1
  • Bone marrow aspirate and biopsy should be performed at diagnosis and as clinically indicated when supported by increased symptoms and signs of progression 1
  • Regular blood count monitoring is essential to detect cytopenias and assess response 2

Hydroxyurea Considerations

  • Hydroxyurea is a human carcinogen with reported secondary leukemia and skin cancer in patients receiving long-term therapy for myeloproliferative disorders 5
  • Monitor for myelosuppression, vasculitic toxicities, and pulmonary toxicity 5
  • Avoid live vaccines in patients taking hydroxyurea 5
  • Reduce dose by 50% in patients with creatinine clearance <60 mL/min 5

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not delay allogeneic HCT evaluation in INT-2 and high-risk patients, as this is the only curative option and survival is significantly shortened without transplantation 1, 2, 3
  • Avoid using hydroxyurea as first-line therapy in myelofibrosis, as it is associated with leukemogenic risk and is not recommended in current guidelines 5
  • Do not rely solely on JAK inhibitor monotherapy for disease modification, as these agents primarily provide symptom control without eliminating the malignant clone 4, 2
  • Referral to specialized centers with expertise in MPN management is strongly recommended for all patients diagnosed with myelofibrosis 1
  • Do not withhold treatment in symptomatic INT-1 patients, as they may benefit from ruxolitinib or should be considered for transplant if high-risk features are present 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MPNs) Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Prognosis and Management of Myelofibrosis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

JAK Inhibitor Mechanism and Clinical Effects in Myeloproliferative Disorders

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.