Is Macrobid (nitrofurantoin) effective against Enterococcus faecalis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 25, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Nitrofurantoin (Macrobid) Coverage of Enterococcus faecalis

Yes, nitrofurantoin (Macrobid) has good in vitro activity against Enterococcus faecalis and is FDA-approved for lower urinary tract infections caused by this organism. 1

Microbiological Activity

  • Nitrofurantoin demonstrates excellent activity against E. faecalis, with susceptibility rates of 88-91% in clinical isolates, including those with vancomycin resistance 2, 3, 4

  • The drug maintains activity against vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), with 80.76% of VRE isolates remaining susceptible to nitrofurantoin 2

  • No resistance was detected (MIC ≥128 μg/mL) in a study of 300 enterococcal isolates, including vancomycin-resistant E. faecalis strains 5

Clinical Indications and Limitations

Appropriate Use:

  • Lower urinary tract infections (cystitis) caused by E. faecalis - this is the FDA-approved indication 1

  • Chronic bacterial prostatitis caused by resistant E. faecalis when combined with rifampin (100 mg PO every 6 hours) per American Urological Association recommendations 6

Critical Limitations:

  • Nitrofurantoin achieves poor plasma concentrations and should NOT be used for:

    • Bacteremia or bloodstream infections 1
    • Endocarditis 1
    • Pyelonephritis or upper urinary tract infections 1
    • Any systemic enterococcal infection 1
  • Clinical efficacy data is limited - while in vitro activity is well-documented, clinical outcome data for treating VRE infections is rarely reported 1

Comparative Effectiveness

  • Nitrofurantoin shows superior activity compared to other oral agents for enterococcal UTIs, with higher susceptibility rates than doxycycline (11%), co-trimoxazole (13%), and comparable to vancomycin (99%) 3

  • Among ampicillin-resistant strains, 50-88% remain susceptible to nitrofurantoin 3

Monitoring and Safety

  • Monitor for adverse effects including pulmonary reactions, hepatic toxicity, and gastrointestinal disturbances 6

  • Complete the full prescribed course to ensure eradication and prevent relapse 6

Alternative Agents for Systemic E. faecalis Infections

When nitrofurantoin is inappropriate (systemic infections, bacteremia, endocarditis):

  • Ampicillin remains the drug of choice for susceptible E. faecalis, typically combined with gentamicin for synergy in serious infections 1

  • For vancomycin-resistant E. faecalis: linezolid or daptomycin (8-12 mg/kg) are preferred for serious infections 1

  • Fosfomycin is FDA-approved for UTI caused by E. faecalis and has activity against VRE 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Revisiting Nitrofurantoin for Vancomycin Resistant Enterococci.

Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 2017

Research

In-vitro activity of nitrofurantoin in enterococcus urinary tract infection.

JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 2004

Research

Antibiotic Resistance in Enterococcus faecalis Isolated from Hospitalized Patients.

Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects, 2013

Research

Nitrofurantoin is active against vancomycin-resistant enterococci.

Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2001

Guideline

Rifampin and Nitrofurantoin Combination for Chronic Bacterial Prostatitis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.