Operative Vaginal Delivery is Most Appropriate
Given fetal distress (late decelerations with minimal variability) in an exhausted mother with the baby engaged at 2+ station, operative vaginal delivery (forceps or vacuum) is the most appropriate immediate intervention to expedite delivery and prevent further fetal compromise. 1
Rationale for Operative Vaginal Delivery
The clinical scenario presents Category II-III fetal heart rate abnormalities requiring expedited delivery:
Late decelerations with minimal variability indicate possible fetal hypoxia or acidemia requiring discontinuation of oxytocin (if in use) and expedited delivery via operative vaginal or cesarean delivery 1
Station 2+ indicates the fetal head is adequately descended (2 cm below the ischial spines), making operative vaginal delivery technically feasible and safer than cesarean section at this stage 2
Cesarean delivery in the second stage of labor carries greater maternal morbidity than operative vaginal delivery, including increased risk of uterine incision extensions, hemorrhage requiring transfusion, and infection 2
The "pull" methods required for impacted fetal head during second-stage cesarean (reverse breech extraction or Patwardhan method) carry risks of femoral and humeral fractures in the neonate 2
Why Other Options Are Inappropriate
Option C (Reassessing after 1 hour) is Dangerous
- Delaying delivery with persistent late decelerations and minimal variability risks progressive fetal acidemia 1, 3
- The absence of normal variability with late decelerations suggests physiologic compensations are being overwhelmed by asphyxia severity 3
- Category III patterns (absent variability with recurrent late decelerations) require expedited delivery, not observation 1
Option D (Oxytocin) is Contraindicated
- Oxytocin is not indicated for maternal exhaustion with fetal distress at full dilation but rather for active phase protraction disorder or arrest of labor 2
- With evidence of fetal compromise (late decelerations), oxytocin should be discontinued, not initiated 1
- Continuing oxytocin with abnormal fetal heart rate patterns risks worsening uteroplacental insufficiency 1
Option A (Cesarean Section) is Less Optimal Than Operative Vaginal Delivery
- While cesarean section is acceptable, operative vaginal delivery at 2+ station has lower maternal morbidity than second-stage cesarean 2
- Cesarean should be reserved for failed operative vaginal delivery or when operative delivery is not feasible 1, 4
Critical Implementation Points
Before proceeding with operative vaginal delivery:
- Ensure adequate anesthesia for the exhausted mother 4
- Confirm station is truly 2+ through serial suprapubic palpation of the fetal skull base (not just molding) 5
- Verify no evidence of cephalopelvic disproportion through complete cephalopelvimetric assessment 6, 5
- The operator must have adequate clinical experience and appropriate training 4
During the procedure:
- Failure to achieve delivery in a reasonable time should prompt abandonment and conversion to cesarean section 4
- Either vacuum or forceps may be used based on operator experience, as neither is clearly safer or more effective 4
- Routine episiotomy is not necessary 4
Common Pitfall to Avoid
Do not confuse molding with true descent - use serial suprapubic palpation of the base of the fetal skull to confirm actual descent rather than relying solely on vaginal examination 5