What is the success rate of atrial fibrillation (A fib) ablation?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 25, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Success Rates

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation achieves approximately 90% success for paroxysmal AF and 80% success for persistent AF, though multiple procedures are often required to achieve these outcomes. 1

Success Rates by AF Type

Paroxysmal AF

  • Single procedure success: 67.8% at 5 years, 56.3% at 10 years, and 47.6% at 15 years 2
  • Final ablation success (after multiple procedures if needed): 80.3% at 5 years, 72.6% at 10 years, and 62.5% at 15 years 2
  • Accumulated experience from nearly 4000 patients demonstrates approximately 90% success in paroxysmal AF cases 1
  • First-year success rates range from 73-80% freedom from AF after pulmonary vein isolation, though 29-41% of patients require a second procedure 1

Persistent AF

  • Single procedure success: 46.6% at 5 years, 35.6% at 10 years, and 26.5% at 15 years 2
  • Final ablation success: 60.1% at 5 years, 50.2% at 10 years, and 42.5% at 15 years 2
  • Accumulated experience shows approximately 80% success in persistent AF cases 1
  • Real-world data from 291 patients showed 56% overall success at 2 years, with 78% probability of maintaining sinus rhythm when accounting for multiple procedures 3

Long-Standing Persistent AF

  • Single procedure success: 30.4% at 5 years, 18.0% at 10 years, and only 3.4% at 15 years 2
  • Final ablation success: 43.4% at 5 years, 32.0% at 10 years, and 20.6% at 15 years 2
  • This represents the most challenging AF subtype with significantly lower success rates that have not improved across ablation technology eras 2

Multiple Procedure Requirements

The majority of patients require more than one ablation to achieve long-term success. 1

  • In early studies, 70% of patients required multiple procedures to achieve 62% freedom from symptomatic AF 1
  • For patients undergoing a second ablation after initial failure, success rate is 64% 3
  • For patients requiring third or fourth procedures, success rate is 56% 3
  • Recurrences occur most commonly in the first 2 years, with a steady 2% per year recurrence rate from years 2-15 2

Technology Evolution and Success Rates

Ablation outcomes have improved significantly with newer catheter technologies, particularly contact force catheters. 2

By Catheter Era (8-year success after final ablation):

  • Contact force catheters (2014-2021): PAF 79.1%, PeAF 55.9%, LsAF 42.7% 2
  • Open irrigated tip catheters (2005-2016): PAF 71.8%, PeAF 50.7%, LsAF 36.2% 2
  • Solid big tip catheters (2003-2005): PAF 60.0%, PeAF 38.0%, LsAF 31.8% 2

The contact force and open irrigated tip technologies are both superior to older solid big tip catheters for paroxysmal and persistent AF (P < .001), though no technology has improved outcomes for long-standing persistent AF 2

Predictors of Success

Key factors predicting higher ablation success include: 2

  • Younger age
  • Smaller left atrium size
  • Shorter AF duration
  • Male sex
  • Paroxysmal rather than persistent AF type
  • Lower CHA₂DS₂-VASc score
  • Fewer antiarrhythmic drugs previously failed
  • More recent catheter technology era

Patients with cardiac dysfunction have lower success rates compared to those without structural heart disease 1

Quality of Life Improvements

Catheter ablation significantly improves quality of life, exercise capacity, and left ventricular function, typically within 3-6 months post-procedure. 1

  • 90% of young adults (≤50 years) reported QoL improvement up to 5 years post-ablation 4
  • AF severity scores improved from median baseline of 14 to 2-4 at all follow-up timepoints (P<0.0001) 4
  • Patients reported fewer and shorter AF episodes, fewer emergency room visits, and fewer hospitalizations 4
  • In patients with tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy, left ventricular ejection fraction improved from 26% to 34% on average, with 29% achieving complete normalization by one year 5

Complications

Major complications occur in approximately 6% of procedures. 1

Serious Complications Include:

  • Cardiac tamponade 6
  • Stroke/thromboembolism (0-5% incidence) 1
  • Atrio-esophageal fistula (rare but often fatal) 1, 6
  • Pulmonary vein stenosis (dramatically reduced with modern techniques avoiding energy delivery within veins) 1, 6
  • Left atrial flutter 1

Real-world complication rates may be higher: A multicenter study reported 6.6% total complications (2.5% serious), including 2 deaths (1 procedure-related) 3

Important Clinical Caveats

AF can recur asymptomatically, making apparent "cures" potentially misleading. 1

  • Asymptomatic recurrences may be unrecognized by both patient and physician 1
  • This has critical implications for anticoagulation decisions, as stroke risk persists regardless of symptoms 1
  • Patients with stroke risk factors should continue anticoagulation indefinitely despite apparent ablation success 1

Post-ablation AF may occur transiently in the first 2 months and does not necessarily predict long-term failure. 1

At 2 years post-ablation, 35% of patients remain on antiarrhythmic therapy, indicating that ablation alone may not eliminate the need for medical management 3

References

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.