What are the criteria for diagnosing Right Ventricular Hypertrophy (RVH)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 26, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Electrocardiographic Criteria for Right Ventricular Hypertrophy

The diagnosis of RVH relies on multiple ECG criteria derived from R and S wave amplitudes in leads I, V1, and V6, along with R-wave peak time in V1, though sensitivity is generally low (18-43%) while specificity remains high (83-95%). 1, 2

Core Diagnostic Approach

Right axis deviation (>90°) should be required for RVH diagnosis in nearly all cases, as this represents the fundamental shift of the QRS vector rightward and anteriorly that occurs with RVH. 3, 4

Primary Voltage Criteria

The following criteria have validated specificity for RVH diagnosis:

  • R/S ratio in V5 or V6 ≤1 - This reflects the dominance of right ventricular forces over left ventricular forces 2
  • S wave in V5 or V6 ≥7 mm - Indicates persistent rightward forces in lateral precordial leads 2
  • Tall R waves in V1 (as part of Rs, R, or Qr complexes) - Represents anterior displacement of QRS forces 1, 3
  • R-wave peak time delay in V1 - Reflects delayed right ventricular activation 1

Pattern Recognition by Etiology

RVH manifests in two distinct ECG patterns that provide diagnostic and etiologic information:

Pressure Overload Pattern:

  • Predominantly tall R waves in right precordial leads (Rs, R, or Qr complexes in V1) 3, 4
  • Right axis deviation 3
  • ST segment depression and T wave inversion in right precordial leads 3, 4

Volume Overload Pattern:

  • Resembles incomplete right bundle branch block 1, 3
  • Right axis deviation 3
  • Secondary ST-T abnormalities 3, 4

Recommended Diagnostic Strategy

Use any one of the following four criteria for RVH diagnosis: 2

  1. R/S ratio in V5 or V6 ≤1
  2. S wave in V5 or V6 ≥7 mm
  3. Right axis deviation >+90°
  4. P pulmonale

For higher specificity (95%), require any two of these criteria in combination. 2

Critical Context-Dependent Considerations

Accuracy by Clinical Setting

The diagnostic accuracy of ECG criteria varies dramatically by underlying condition:

  • Highest accuracy: Congenital heart disease 1, 3, 4
  • Intermediate accuracy: Acquired heart disease and primary pulmonary hypertension 1, 3
  • Lowest accuracy: Chronic lung disease 1, 3, 4

Special Considerations in COPD

In patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, additional findings suggest RVH:

  • Low voltage in limb leads 3
  • Frontal plane QRS axis deviation to the right, superior, or indeterminate 3
  • Rightward P wave axis (>60°) 3
  • Persistent S waves in all precordial leads 3
  • Low R wave amplitude in V6 3
  • RVH is suggested only if R wave amplitude in V1 is relatively increased compared to baseline 3

Pediatric Criteria

Age-specific criteria must be used in children, as normal R wave amplitude in V1 and S wave amplitude in V6 vary significantly with age. 1, 4

For children ≥5 years:

  • RV1 ≥13 mm suggests RVH 1
  • SV6 ≥4 mm suggests RVH 1
  • RV1 + SV6 ≥17 mm suggests RVH 1

Biventricular Hypertrophy Recognition

When ECG criteria for LVH are present, suspect concurrent RVH if:

  • Prominent S waves in V5 or V6 1, 3
  • Right axis deviation 1, 3
  • Unusually tall biphasic R/S complexes in several leads 1, 3
  • Signs of right atrial abnormality 1, 3

In congenital heart disease with RVH, combined R and S wave amplitudes in V2-V6 >60 mm (6.04 mV) suggests coexistent LVH. 1, 3

Common Pitfalls

The major limitation is low sensitivity (27-43%) - considerable RVH must be present to overcome the normal left ventricular dominance of QRS forces. 1, 5 Many patients with anatomically confirmed RVH will have normal ECGs.

ECG diagnosis is particularly unreliable in the presence of:

  • Conduction defects (bundle branch blocks) 5
  • Old myocardial infarction 5
  • Chronic lung disease 1, 3

Do not rely on a single criterion - using multiple criteria improves diagnostic accuracy, though this must be balanced against reduced sensitivity. 1, 3, 4

Echocardiographic Correlation

When ECG findings are equivocal or clinical suspicion is high despite negative ECG, echocardiography is far more sensitive (93% vs 27-31%) for detecting RVH, with RV wall thickness ≥5 mm defining hypertrophy. 5, 6

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Electrocardiographic Signs of Right Ventricular Overload

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

ECG Findings Suggestive of Right Ventricular Dysfunction

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.