What is the management for a penetrating injury at zone 2 of the neck?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 26, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management of Penetrating Zone 2 Neck Injuries

The management of penetrating zone 2 neck injuries depends critically on hemodynamic stability and presence of "hard signs"—patients with hard signs require immediate surgical exploration without imaging, while stable patients with soft signs should undergo CT angiography followed by selective management. 1

Initial Assessment and Risk Stratification

The key to managing zone 2 penetrating neck trauma is distinguishing between patients requiring immediate operative intervention versus those who can safely undergo imaging-guided selective management 1.

Hard Signs Requiring Immediate Surgical Exploration

Proceed directly to the operating room without preoperative imaging if any of the following are present 1:

  • Active hemorrhage or pulsatile/expanding hematoma
  • Hemodynamic instability
  • Airway compromise or air bubbling from the wound
  • Hemoptysis (suggests tracheal or major vascular injury)
  • Dysphonia (indicates laryngeal or recurrent laryngeal nerve injury)
  • Pneumothorax (indicates significant aerodigestive tract injury)
  • Bruit or thrill over the wound
  • Unilateral upper-extremity pulse deficit
  • Massive hematemesis

Delaying surgical exploration in patients with hard signs significantly increases mortality 1. The mortality rate for penetrating neck injuries can reach 10%, making prompt recognition and intervention critical 2.

Soft Signs Allowing Selective Management

Stable patients with the following findings can safely undergo imaging before deciding on surgical intervention 1:

  • Dysphagia (may indicate esophageal or pharyngeal injury)
  • Nonpulsatile, nonexpanding hematoma
  • Subcutaneous emphysema
  • Venous oozing

The "No-Zone" Approach

Current evidence supports abandoning the traditional zone-based mandatory exploration approach in favor of a selective, clinical signs-based strategy regardless of injury zone 1, 3. Historically, all zone 2 injuries underwent mandatory exploration 4, but this resulted in 52-53% negative explorations with no significant injuries found 5, 4.

The American College of Radiology now recommends focusing on clinical presentation rather than anatomic zones alone 1. This selective approach has demonstrated superior patient outcomes compared to traditional mandatory exploration 3.

Imaging Algorithm for Stable Patients

First-Line Imaging: CT Angiography

For stable patients with soft signs, CT angiography (CTA) with IV contrast is the imaging study of choice (rated 9/9 - "usually appropriate") 2. CTA has excellent diagnostic performance with:

  • Sensitivity: 90-100% for detecting vascular injuries 1, 6
  • Specificity: 98.6-100% for vascular injuries 1, 6

Obtain plain X-ray of the neck first (rated 7/9) if there is a gunshot wound or any question about retained foreign bodies, as metallic fragments can interfere with MRI 2.

Follow-Up Imaging Based on CTA Results

If CTA is normal or equivocal but vascular injury remains a concern:

  • Conventional arteriography is the next step (rated 8/9) 2
  • MRA with and without IV contrast may be appropriate (rated 5/9) 2
  • Ultrasound may be appropriate (rated 4/9) 2

If CTA is normal or equivocal but aerodigestive injury is suspected:

  • Barium swallow (single contrast) is the preferred study (rated 8/9) 2
  • MRI neck with and without IV contrast may be appropriate (rated 5/9) 2

Common Pitfalls and Caveats

Missed Injuries with Selective Management

Isolated venous injuries and pharyngoesophageal injuries are most likely to be missed on clinical examination alone 4. In one series, 23% of patients with injuries had no preoperative clinical suspicion of injury 4. This underscores the importance of liberal use of CTA in stable patients with any concerning mechanism or soft signs.

Arteriography Limitations

Arteriography can yield false-negative results—two arterial injuries were missed by arteriography in one series 4. However, in another study of 110 zone 2 injuries, only one patient had a significant arterial injury requiring surgery that was not predicted by physical findings 7.

Vertebral Artery Injuries

Vertebral artery injuries are particularly prone to delayed diagnosis 5. One patient died 4 months after injury from a missed vertebral artery pseudoaneurysm 5. Six of nine arterial injuries treated nonoperatively in one series were vertebral artery injuries 7, highlighting that not all vascular injuries require surgical repair.

Airway Management Considerations

If airway control is needed, rapid sequence intubation using succinylcholine has a 100% success rate and should be the initial technique 8. In a series of 58 patients requiring emergency airway management for penetrating neck injury, rapid sequence intubation was successful in all 39 cases attempted and even salvaged three failed fiberoptic intubation attempts 8.

Emergency tracheostomy should be reserved for situations where orotracheal intubation is impossible 8.

Outcomes with Selective Management

Selective management based on clinical signs and imaging results in acceptable mortality (6%) and complication rates (1-5%) while avoiding unnecessary exploration in approximately 52% of cases 5. This approach is safe across all neck zones when applied appropriately 5.

References

Guideline

Management of Penetrating Neck Trauma

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Penetrating neck injuries: a guide to evaluation and management.

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2018

Guideline

Treatment of Neck Injuries in Musical Performers

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Emergency airway management in penetrating neck injury.

Annals of emergency medicine, 2000

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.