What is the most likely organ to be injured in a vitally stable pediatric patient with upper abdominal pain after blunt abdominal trauma and a non-conclusive Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) exam?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 27, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Most Likely Injured Organ in Pediatric Blunt Abdominal Trauma

The spleen is the most likely organ injured in this 9-year-old with blunt abdominal trauma from a bicycle accident (Answer B). 1, 2, 3

Epidemiologic Evidence

The spleen is definitively the most commonly injured solid organ in pediatric blunt abdominal trauma across all age groups and mechanisms. 1, 2, 3 This holds true specifically for bicycle-related injuries, which represent a common mechanism in the pediatric population. 1

  • The spleen accounts for the majority of solid organ injuries in children following blunt abdominal trauma, making it statistically the most probable source of this patient's upper abdominal pain. 1, 2
  • Motor vehicle crashes and bicycle accidents are the predominant mechanisms causing splenic injury in pediatric patients. 1, 4

Clinical Reasoning in This Stable Patient

Since this child is hemodynamically stable, the non-conclusive FAST examination does not change the likelihood of splenic injury:

  • FAST has limited sensitivity (50-92%, with meta-analyses suggesting ~66%) for detecting splenic injury in children, making a non-conclusive study expected and uninformative for ruling out injury. 5
  • The low specificity of FAST in pediatric patients means that hemodynamically stable children with suspected intra-abdominal injury require contrast-enhanced CT scan as the gold standard for diagnosis, regardless of FAST results. 5
  • Less than half of pediatric patients with abdominal injury have free fluid detectable on FAST, further limiting its utility in this population. 2

Next Steps for This Patient

This hemodynamically stable child requires contrast-enhanced CT scan of the abdomen to definitively identify and grade the splenic injury (or identify alternative injuries). 5

  • CT scanning is specifically recommended in children at risk for injuries that might be missed by FAST, which includes this clinical scenario. 5
  • The presence of upper abdominal pain following blunt trauma with a non-diagnostic FAST meets criteria for CT evaluation. 5

Why Not the Other Organs?

While liver, pancreas, and kidney injuries can occur in pediatric blunt trauma, they are significantly less common than splenic injury:

  • Hepatic trauma occurs less frequently than splenic trauma in blunt abdominal injury patterns. 3
  • Pancreatic trauma is uncommon and typically requires specific mechanisms like handlebar injuries with direct epigastric impact. 3
  • Renal injuries are less common than splenic injuries in the overall pediatric trauma population. 3

Management Implications

Once splenic injury is confirmed on CT, this hemodynamically stable child should receive non-operative management (NOM) as first-line treatment, regardless of injury grade. 5, 6 NOM is successful in 95-100% of pediatric blunt splenic trauma patients who are hemodynamically stable at presentation. 5

References

Research

Pediatric Abdominal Trauma.

Current pediatric reviews, 2018

Research

Evaluation and Management of Blunt Solid Organ Trauma.

Techniques in vascular and interventional radiology, 2017

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Management of Splenic Rupture

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.