Is Staphylococcus epidermidis receptive to clindamycin?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 27, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Staphylococcus epidermidis Susceptibility to Clindamycin

Staphylococcus epidermidis shows variable susceptibility to clindamycin, with approximately 10% resistance rates in general populations, but clindamycin is NOT recommended as first-line therapy for S. epidermidis infections, particularly in serious infections like septicemia and endocarditis where resistance rates are significantly higher. 1

Susceptibility Profile

  • The FDA drug label confirms that at least 90% of methicillin-susceptible S. epidermidis strains exhibit in vitro susceptibility to clindamycin, though clinical efficacy has not been established in adequate controlled trials 2

  • Historical surveillance data from UK centers showed 10% resistance among S. epidermidis isolates, with resistant strains distributed across geographic regions and uniformly resistant to erythromycin 3

  • Clindamycin demonstrates poor activity against methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis (MRSE), with no difference in MICs between slime-producing and non-slime-producing strains 4

Critical Clinical Limitations

When NOT to Use Clindamycin for S. epidermidis

  • S. epidermidis septicemia and endocarditis are NOT suitable for clindamycin therapy due to high resistance rates 1

  • The Infectious Diseases Society of America recommends vancomycin as empiric therapy for coagulase-negative staphylococcal infections because most are methicillin-resistant, particularly in healthcare-associated infections 5

  • Clindamycin is bacteriostatic and therefore not recommended for endovascular infections such as infective endocarditis or septic thrombophlebitis 6

Problematic Biofilm Induction

  • Subinhibitory concentrations of clindamycin induce biofilm formation in MRSE strains, with up-regulation of biofilm-associated genes (atlE and icaA) by 0.18 to 1.4 folds 7

  • This biofilm induction increases bacterial survival and persistence on device surfaces, worsening device-associated infections 7

When Clindamycin May Be Appropriate

  • Mixed staphylococcal and anaerobic infections in skin, subcutaneous tissue, diabetic foot, bone and joints are primary indications where clindamycin provides dual coverage 1

  • Clindamycin demonstrates excellent tissue penetration, particularly in bone and abscesses, though CSF penetration is limited 6

  • The Infectious Diseases Society of America recommends clindamycin only when local resistance rates are <10% 8

Recommended Alternative Approach

  • Switch to vancomycin targeting trough levels of 10-15 mg/L for most coagulase-negative staphylococcal infections 5

  • De-escalate to a semisynthetic penicillin (nafcillin, oxacillin) or first-generation cephalosporin (cefazolin) if susceptibility testing confirms methicillin susceptibility, as beta-lactams are superior to vancomycin for susceptible organisms 5

  • For prosthetic valve endocarditis caused by S. epidermidis, treat for minimum 6 weeks with vancomycin plus rifampin, adding gentamicin for the first 2 weeks 5

Key Pitfall to Avoid

  • Do not use clindamycin for serious S. epidermidis infections (bacteremia, endocarditis, device-related infections) where resistance rates are high and bactericidal activity is required 1

  • Always perform D-zone testing for erythromycin-resistant, clindamycin-susceptible isolates to detect inducible clindamycin resistance 6

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.