Do insurer- or health-system–sponsored gym memberships, fitness benefits, or personal training programs reduce overall healthcare utilization or total healthcare costs?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 27, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Insurer- and Health-System–Sponsored Fitness Programs: Evidence for Cost Savings and Healthcare Utilization

Insurer- or health-system–sponsored gym memberships and fitness programs do reduce healthcare costs by an average of $344 per person per year, but these savings require comprehensive, multicomponent program design with high adherence rates, and the timeline to realize savings typically extends beyond 12 months. 1

Magnitude of Cost Savings

The most robust evidence demonstrates an average reduction of $344 per person per year in total healthcare costs associated with community-based comprehensive fitness programs, though this figure comes from nonrandomized trials and represents the upper range of documented savings. 1

  • Cost-effectiveness analyses from the United Kingdom show a ratio of £12,111 per quality-adjusted life-year gained for national exercise referral programs, with significant cost savings occurring specifically in fully adherent participants (62% of the sample). 1

  • Physical activity is associated with reduced medical costs, with these reductions becoming more significant with increasing age, particularly for women. 2

  • Systematic reviews of worksite fitness programs demonstrate relationships between comprehensive health promotion programs and reductions in healthcare costs, absenteeism, and turnover when control groups are used. 3

Timeline for Cost Savings to Appear

The critical limitation in current evidence is that most documented improvements disappear by 6-12 months, making the timeline for sustained cost savings uncertain and likely extending well beyond one year. 4

  • Short-term improvements in body composition and fitness appear at 2 months but typically disappear by 6 months in randomized controlled trials. 4

  • Within-group analyses show fitness improvements (measured by 1-mile run-walk times) of approximately 2 minutes at 12 months, but these gains require ongoing program participation. 4

  • The American Heart Association notes that physical activity counseling and referral strategies promote improvements in patients' physical activity for up to 12 months, suggesting this is the outer limit of documented short-term effects. 2

Critical Program Design Factors That Determine Success

Program effectiveness depends heavily on comprehensive, multicomponent design rather than simple gym membership alone. The evidence shows that free gym memberships without additional support produce minimal sustained benefits. 4

Essential Components for Cost-Effective Programs:

  • Health education with supportive physical and social environments integrated into organizational structure. 1

  • Linkage to related programs and screening with leadership support and partnership integration. 1

  • One-on-one counseling with follow-up contact targeting at-risk populations to ensure programs benefit the greatest number of employees. 5

  • Insurance coverage of participation costs, which dramatically increases program uptake—Montana's collaboration with Medicaid to reimburse program sites demonstrates this principle. 2, 1

Evidence Gaps and Important Caveats

A major pitfall is that fitness membership benefits may primarily attract healthier beneficiaries rather than improving health outcomes. Medicare Advantage plans offering fitness memberships enrolled beneficiaries who were 6.1 percentage points more likely to report excellent or very good health, 10.4 percentage points less likely to report activity limitations, and 8.1 percentage points less likely to report difficulty walking compared to earlier enrollees. 6 This favorable selection persisted at 2 years for activity limitation and difficulty walking. 6

What Remains Unknown:

  • More evidence based on actual data is needed on costs and benefits of programs implemented in community or primary care settings, including cost-effectiveness, cost-utility ratios, and cost-benefit ratios. 2

  • The relative effectiveness of programs delivered via Internet, email, apps, or social networking remains unclear. 2

  • Studies should evaluate costs associated with recruiting eligible persons to participate, which may be high in both clinical and community settings. 2

Practical Implementation Recommendations

For programs to generate positive financial returns, they must be comprehensive rather than simple gym membership offerings:

  • Programs should include 16 weekly core sessions followed by 8 monthly maintenance sessions, similar to the YMCA's adaptation of the Diabetes Prevention Program, which costs approximately $400 per participant. 2

  • Clinical-community links augment effectiveness and help promote maintenance of intervention effects, as less than 50% of older adults report that physicians have recommended exercise. 1

  • Target at-risk populations rather than offering universal benefits, as this ensures programs benefit those most likely to generate healthcare cost savings. 5

  • Ensure at least 50% attendance at program sessions, as participants meeting this threshold show significantly greater improvements (104 minutes per week increase in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity) compared to brief counseling alone. 2

References

Guideline

Cost-Effectiveness of Fitness Programs in Healthcare

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Employee fitness and wellness programs in the workplace.

The American psychologist, 1990

Research

Fitness memberships and favorable selection in Medicare Advantage plans.

The New England journal of medicine, 2012

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.