What is a modified radical mastoidectomy?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 28, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Modified Radical Mastoidectomy: Definition

Modified radical mastoidectomy is a canal wall down surgical procedure for chronic ear disease that removes all mastoid air cells and creates an open cavity while preserving the tympanic membrane (or reconstructing it) and maintaining ossicular chain function when possible. 1, 2

Surgical Anatomy and Technique

The procedure differs from radical mastoidectomy by its preservation of key middle ear structures:

  • The tympanic membrane and middle ear space are preserved or reconstructed, distinguishing it from radical mastoidectomy where these are removed 1, 2
  • The ossicular chain remains intact when functional, allowing for potential hearing preservation 1, 3
  • All mastoid air cells are removed with creation of an exteriorized cavity 2, 4
  • The posterior canal wall is taken down to provide complete disease access 4, 5

Original Bondy Criteria for Modified Radical Mastoidectomy

The classic indications require all of the following 1:

  • Intact pars tensa with defective pars flaccida containing cholesteatoma 1
  • Normal or near-normal hearing preoperatively 1
  • Intact, functional ossicular chain 1
  • Cholesteatoma delineated lateral to the body of the incus (proposed fourth criterion based on disease control outcomes) 1

Clinical Context and Outcomes

Modified radical mastoidectomy addresses chronic suppurative otitis media with cholesteatoma:

  • The procedure achieves disease eradication while maintaining hearing potential, with studies showing mean air conduction gain of 21.24 dB and air-bone gap closure of 15.62 dB 4
  • Open cavity techniques carry 20-60% risk of persistent intermittent drainage, though cavity reconstruction with Palva flap reduces this to approximately 7% 2
  • Hearing results are comparable to intact canal wall procedures when appropriate reconstruction is performed, with no significant bone conduction changes despite extensive drilling 3
  • Better outcomes occur with primary surgery versus revision and when the stapes remains intact 3

Important Surgical Considerations

This is fundamentally different from modified radical mastectomy in breast surgery—the terminology overlap creates potential confusion, but these are completely distinct procedures in different anatomic regions 6, 1, 2.

For cholesteatoma in an only hearing ear, contemporary practice increasingly favors intact canal wall approaches over modified radical mastoidectomy when no labyrinthine fistula exists, as open cavity procedures carry higher risk of delayed sensorineural hearing loss 5.

References

Research

Bondy's modified radical mastoidectomy revisited.

Ear, nose, & throat journal, 1994

Research

Reconstruction of the radical mastoid.

The American journal of otology, 1992

Research

Hearing results following modified radical versus canal-up mastoidectomy.

The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology, 1996

Research

Modified Radical Mastoidectomy with Type III Tympanoplasty: Revisited.

Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India, 2016

Research

Evolving considerations in the surgical management of cholesteatoma in the only hearing ear.

Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology, 2014

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.