What is the longest survival rate for stage 4 gastric cancer?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 29, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Longest Survival in Stage 4 Gastric Cancer

For stage 4 gastric cancer, the longest reported median survival is approximately 13.8 months, achieved with trastuzumab added to platinum-fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy in HER2-positive patients. 1

Survival Benchmarks by Treatment Approach

Chemotherapy Alone (Standard Palliative Care)

  • Median survival: 7-11 months with combination chemotherapy regimens 1
  • Best supportive care alone yields only 3-5 months median survival 1
  • Single-agent chemotherapy provides inferior outcomes compared to combination regimens 2

HER2-Targeted Therapy (Best Outcomes)

  • Trastuzumab plus cisplatin/fluoropyrimidine: 13.8 months median survival (versus 11.1 months without trastuzumab) 1
  • This represents the highest survival reported in guidelines for stage 4 disease
  • Only applicable to HER2-positive tumors (approximately 20% of gastric cancers)

Palliative Surgery Plus Chemotherapy (Selected Patients)

  • Median survival: 9.1-16.3 months when palliative gastrectomy is combined with systemic chemotherapy 3, 4
  • Surgery alone without chemotherapy shows no survival benefit 5
  • The REGATTA trial showed no benefit from gastrectomy plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in Asian patients (25.1% versus 31.7% 2-year survival) 1

Key Prognostic Factors Affecting Survival

Favorable factors that extend survival include: 2

  • Combination chemotherapy (versus single agent)
  • Absence of liver metastases
  • Absence of peritoneal metastases
  • Good performance status (KPS ≥60 or ECOG ≤2)
  • No significant weight loss (<5%)
  • Normal LDH levels

Unfavorable factors that shorten survival: 2

  • Histological grade III tumors
  • Hepatic metastases (HR 1.6)
  • Peritoneal metastases (HR 1.33)
  • Weight loss >5% (HR 1.96)
  • Need for blood transfusions (HR 1.58)

Recommended First-Line Regimens

For HER2-positive disease: 1

  • Trastuzumab + cisplatin + fluoropyrimidine (5-FU or capecitabine)
  • Response rate: 47.3% versus 34.5% without trastuzumab

For HER2-negative disease: 1

  • ECF/ECX/EOX (epirubicin, cisplatin/oxaliplatin, 5-FU/capecitabine)
  • DCF (docetaxel, cisplatin, 5-FU) - FDA approved but more toxic 1
  • FOLFOX or irinotecan-based regimens as alternatives 1

Performance Status Thresholds

Chemotherapy candidates: 1

  • KPS ≥60 or ECOG PS ≤2
  • These patients should receive combination chemotherapy plus best supportive care

Best supportive care only: 1

  • KPS <60 or ECOG PS ≥3
  • Chemotherapy unlikely to provide benefit and may worsen quality of life

Critical Caveats

  • The 2-year survival rate for stage 4 gastric cancer remains poor at approximately 25-31% even with optimal treatment 1
  • Palliative gastrectomy carries 8.7% mortality and 33.3% morbidity and should only be considered in highly selected patients with good performance status who can subsequently receive chemotherapy 4
  • Endoscopic stenting provides rapid symptom relief with 0% mortality but does not improve overall survival 5
  • Second-line chemotherapy options exist (irinotecan, taxanes) but have limited data supporting survival benefit 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Palliative gastrectomy and other factors affecting overall survival in stage IV gastric adenocarcinoma patients receiving chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis.

European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology, 2011

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.