What is the Quartz trial in a medical context?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 29, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

The QUARTZ Trial

The QUARTZ (Quality of Life after Treatment for Brain Metastases) trial was a phase 3, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial that demonstrated whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) provides minimal clinically significant benefit over optimal supportive care alone for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and inoperable brain metastases. 1

Trial Design and Population

The QUARTZ study enrolled 538 patients between March 2007 and August 2014 across 69 UK and 3 Australian centers 1. The trial specifically targeted:

  • Patients with NSCLC and brain metastases unsuitable for surgical resection or stereotactic radiotherapy 1
  • Median age of 66 years (range 38-85 years) 1
  • 50% had Karnofsky Performance Status <70, indicating poor functional status 2

Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either optimal supportive care (OSC) including dexamethasone plus WBRT (20 Gy in 5 daily fractions) versus OSC alone with dexamethasone 1. The dexamethasone dose was titrated based on symptom control 1.

Primary Outcome and Key Findings

The primary outcome was quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), with OSC alone considered non-inferior if it was no more than 7 QALY days worse than WBRT plus OSC 1. The trial results showed:

  • No difference in overall survival: hazard ratio 1.06 (95% CI 0.90-1.26) 1
  • Mean QALY difference of only 4.7 days (46.4 days for WBRT group vs 41.7 days for OSC alone) 1
  • Median survival was 49 days for OSC + WBRT versus 51 days for OSC alone 2
  • No evidence of difference in overall quality of life or dexamethasone use between groups 1

Safety and Tolerability

WBRT was associated with significantly more treatment-related toxicities without improving outcomes 1:

  • More episodes of drowsiness, hair loss, nausea, and dry or itchy scalp during WBRT 1
  • No difference in serious adverse event rates between groups 1
  • 85% of patients allocated to WBRT actually received the treatment 2

Clinical Implications

The combination of minimal QALY difference and absence of survival or quality of life benefit suggests WBRT provides little additional clinically significant benefit for this patient population 1. This challenges the widespread practice of routinely offering WBRT to all patients with inoperable brain metastases from NSCLC.

Important Caveats

One retrospective analysis suggested potential survival benefit in patients with favorable prognostic features (age <60 years or graded prognostic assessment score 2.5-3 points) 3. This subgroup analysis found:

  • Median survival of 3.2 months after WBRT (5 fractions of 4 Gy) versus 1.2 months with best supportive care alone 3
  • Survival remained significantly better after WBRT in multivariate analyses 3

However, this contradicts the primary QUARTZ trial findings and represents lower-quality retrospective evidence 3. The prospective randomized QUARTZ trial data should take precedence in clinical decision-making 1.

Trial Methodology Context

The QUARTZ trial employed a non-inferiority design, which is appropriate when evaluating whether a less intensive treatment (OSC alone) is not meaningfully worse than standard treatment (WBRT plus OSC) 4. The prespecified non-inferiority margin of 7 QALY days was clinically reasonable 1.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.