What is the role of Empagliflozin (Empagliflozin) in clinical trials for type 2 diabetes control?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 29, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Empagliflozin in Clinical Trials for Type 2 Diabetes Control

Empagliflozin has been extensively studied in multiple phase 3 clinical trials demonstrating robust glycemic control with HbA1c reductions of 0.59-0.82% across diverse patient populations, while simultaneously providing cardiovascular mortality reduction of 38% and heart failure hospitalization reduction of 35% in patients with established cardiovascular disease. 1, 2, 3

Glycemic Control Efficacy

Primary Diabetes Control Outcomes:

  • Empagliflozin monotherapy and add-on therapy trials (≤104 weeks duration) consistently showed HbA1c reductions ranging from -0.59% to -0.82% compared to placebo 3
  • In head-to-head comparison with glimepiride as add-on to metformin, empagliflozin demonstrated non-inferiority at 52 weeks and superiority at 104 weeks for HbA1c reduction 4
  • The glucose-lowering effect operates through an insulin-independent mechanism by blocking SGLT2-mediated glucose reabsorption in the proximal renal tubules, making it effective regardless of beta-cell function or insulin resistance 1, 4

Major Cardiovascular Outcomes Trial (EMPA-REG OUTCOME)

The landmark EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial established empagliflozin's cardiovascular benefits beyond glucose control:

  • 14% reduction in 3-point MACE composite (cardiovascular death, non-fatal MI, non-fatal stroke): HR 0.86 (95% CI 0.74-0.99; p=0.04) 2, 3, 5
  • 38% reduction in cardiovascular death: HR 0.62 (95% CI 0.49-0.77; p<0.001) 1, 2, 3
  • 32% reduction in all-cause mortality: HR 0.68 (95% CI 0.57-0.82; p<0.001) 3, 5
  • 35% reduction in hospitalization for heart failure: HR 0.65 (95% CI 0.50-0.85) 6, 3

Heart Failure Trials

EMPEROR-Reduced Trial:

  • Studied 3,730 patients with NYHA class II-IV heart failure and ejection fraction ≤40% 6
  • 21% reduction in composite cardiovascular death or hospitalization for worsening heart failure: HR 0.79 (95% CI 0.69-0.90; p<0.001) over 26.2 months 6
  • Benefits were consistent in patients with or without diabetes (approximately 50% had type 2 diabetes at baseline) 6

EMPEROR-Preserved Trial:

  • Enrolled 5,988 adults with HFpEF (ejection fraction >40%) 6
  • 21% reduction in composite cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure: HR 0.79 (95% CI 0.69-0.90; p<0.001) over 26.2 months 6
  • Effects remained consistent regardless of diabetes status 6

Additional Metabolic Benefits Beyond Glucose Control

Weight and Blood Pressure Reductions:

  • Body weight reduction: -2.1 to -2.5 kg across trials 3, 5
  • Systolic blood pressure reduction: -2.9 to -5.2 mmHg without compensatory heart rate increase 7, 3, 5
  • These benefits occur independently of glycemic improvements 7

Renal Protection

Kidney Outcomes:

  • 39% reduction in incident or worsening nephropathy: HR 0.61 (95% CI 0.53-0.70) 2
  • 50% reduction in prespecified renal composite outcome (chronic dialysis, renal transplantation, or sustained eGFR reduction): HR 0.50 (95% CI 0.32-0.77) 6
  • Empagliflozin improved chronic kidney disease outcomes in patients with moderate to severe CKD and type 2 diabetes, with similar effects in individuals without diabetes 6

Safety Profile

Hypoglycemia Risk:

  • Low inherent risk of hypoglycemia due to insulin-independent mechanism when used as monotherapy 7, 4
  • Increased hypoglycemia only when combined with insulin or insulin secretagogues (sulfonylureas) 3, 4

Common Adverse Events:

  • Genital mycotic infections are the most frequently reported adverse events, typically mild to moderate and straightforward to manage 7, 5, 4
  • Urinary tract infections and volume depletion events are relatively rare 8
  • Unlike canagliflozin, empagliflozin has not been associated with increased risk of amputation or bone fractures 7

Current Guideline Recommendations

Preferred Patient Populations:

  • Patients with type 2 diabetes and established cardiovascular disease should receive empagliflozin to reduce cardiovascular mortality 1, 2
  • Patients with type 2 diabetes and heart failure (HFrEF or HFpEF) should receive empagliflozin to reduce worsening heart failure and cardiovascular death 6
  • Patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease with albuminuria should receive empagliflozin for renal protection 6, 1
  • SGLT2 inhibitors like empagliflozin should be prescribed to individuals with type 2 diabetes who have established or are at high risk for ASCVD, CKD, and/or heart failure 6

Treatment Algorithm Position:

  • GLP-1 receptor agonists are positioned above metformin due to superior glycemic potency, weight reduction, and cardiovascular benefits 6
  • Metformin is placed ahead of SGLT2 inhibitors due to glycemic potency, though SGLT2 inhibitors provide additional kidney and cardiovascular benefits 6
  • Many patients will require combination therapy with GLP-1 RAs, SGLT2 inhibitors, and metformin to achieve individualized HbA1c goals (typically 6.5-7.0% for most patients) 6

References

Guideline

Role of Empagliflozin in Type 2 Diabetes Management with Established Cardiovascular Disease

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Cardiovascular Benefits of Empagliflozin in Type 2 Diabetes

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Empagliflozin: Role in Treatment Options for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders, 2017

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.