What are the bone marrow findings in Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) at different stages?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 29, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Bone Marrow Findings in MDS at Different Stages

Bone marrow findings in MDS vary systematically by disease stage, with blast percentage being the most critical prognostic feature, ranging from <5% in lower-risk subtypes to 5-19% in higher-risk RAEB, alongside characteristic dysplastic changes that define each WHO classification subtype. 1

Lower-Risk MDS Subtypes (Blast Count <5%)

Refractory Cytopenia with Unilineage Dysplasia (RCUD)

  • Dysplasia: ≥10% of cells in one myeloid lineage only 1
  • Blast percentage: <5% in bone marrow 1
  • Ring sideroblasts: <15% of erythroid precursors 1
  • Specific variants include: Refractory Anemia (RA), Refractory Neutropenia (RN), and Refractory Thrombocytopenia (RT) 1

Refractory Anemia with Ring Sideroblasts (RARS)

  • Ring sideroblasts: ≥15% of erythroid precursors (or ≥5% if SF3B1 mutation present) 1
  • Dysplasia: Erythroid dysplasia only 1
  • Blast percentage: <5% in bone marrow, no blasts in peripheral blood 1
  • Prognosis: Low AML progression rate, especially with isolated SF3B1 mutation 1

Refractory Cytopenia with Multilineage Dysplasia (RCMD)

  • Dysplasia: ≥10% of cells in two or more myeloid lineages 1
  • Blast percentage: <5% in bone marrow 1
  • Ring sideroblasts: May be present (±15%) 1
  • Auer rods: Absent 1

MDS with Isolated del(5q)

  • Megakaryocytes: Normal to increased numbers with hypolobulated nuclei 1
  • Blast percentage: <5% in bone marrow 1
  • Cytogenetics: Isolated del(5q) chromosomal abnormality is the defining feature 1
  • Auer rods: Absent 1

Higher-Risk MDS Subtypes (Increased Blast Count)

Refractory Anemia with Excess Blasts-1 (RAEB-1)

  • Blast percentage: 5-9% in bone marrow (or 2-4% in peripheral blood if marrow <5%) 1
  • Dysplasia: Unilineage or multilineage dysplasia 1
  • Auer rods: Absent 1
  • Prognosis: Major risk of progression to AML 1

Refractory Anemia with Excess Blasts-2 (RAEB-2)

  • Blast percentage: 10-19% in bone marrow (or 5-19% range) 1
  • Dysplasia: Unilineage or multilineage dysplasia 1
  • Auer rods: May be present 1
  • Critical caveat: Cases with Auer rods and <5% myeloblasts in blood and <10% in marrow should still be classified as RAEB-2 1
  • Prognosis: Highest risk of AML transformation and short survival 1

Universal Bone Marrow Features Across All MDS Stages

Cellularity Assessment

  • Typical finding: Hypercellular marrow in 63% of cases 2
  • Cellularity increases: Progressively higher in RAEB, RAEB-t, and CMML compared to RA/RARS 2
  • Hypocellular variants: Require bone marrow biopsy for diagnosis, may mimic aplastic anemia 1
  • Prognostic significance: Cellularity independently affects survival (P=0.006) 2

Dysplastic Features by Cell Line

Erythroid dysplasia (present in 72% of cases): 2

  • Nuclear abnormalities: multinuclearity, nuclear budding, karyorrhexis 1
  • Cytoplasmic changes: megaloblastic features, vacuolization 1
  • Ring sideroblasts when present 1

Megakaryocytic dysplasia (present in 83% of cases): 2

  • Hypolobulated or non-lobulated nuclei 1
  • Micromegakaryocytes 1
  • Prognostic impact: Dysmegakaryopoiesis shows borderline relationship with survival (P=0.07) 2

Granulocytic dysplasia: 1

  • Nuclear hypolobation (pseudo-Pelger-Huët anomaly) 1
  • Cytoplasmic hypogranulation 1
  • Abnormal maturation patterns detectable by flow cytometry 3

Topographic Abnormalities

  • Abnormal Localization of Immature Precursors (ALIP): Found in >50% of cases, more frequent in RAEB/RAEB-t/CMML 2
  • Distribution: Immature precursors located away from normal paratrabecular location 2

Additional Histologic Features

  • Reticulin fibrosis: Present in 47% of cases 2
  • Eosinophilia: Evident in 26% of cases, correlates with survival (P=0.009) 2
  • Plasmacytosis: Present in 18% of cases 2

Critical Diagnostic Requirements

Mandatory Bone Marrow Evaluation

  • Aspirate: Evaluation of dysplasia, blast enumeration (count 500 cells), ring sideroblast enumeration 1
  • Biopsy: Assessment of cellularity, fibrosis, topography, and ALIP 1
  • Both procedures strongly recommended: Biopsy provides independent prognostic information beyond aspirate morphology 1, 2

Blast Counting Pitfalls

  • Paramount prognostic value: Bone marrow blast count is the most critical parameter 1
  • Discordance handling: If marrow blasts <5% but peripheral blood shows 2-4% blasts, classify as RAEB-1 1
  • Auer rod exception: Presence of Auer rods with <5% blood blasts and <10% marrow blasts mandates RAEB-2 classification 1

Cytogenetic Integration

  • Clonal abnormalities: Observed in >80% of MDS patients 1
  • Highest prognostic weight: Karyotype has the strongest impact in IPSS-R scoring 1
  • Diagnostic utility: Specific abnormalities (del(5q), -7/del(7q), complex karyotype) can establish MDS diagnosis even with minimal dysplasia 1

Staging Implications

Lower-risk MDS (IPSS Low/Intermediate-1): 1

  • Bone marrow blasts <5% 1
  • Predominantly single or multilineage dysplasia without excess blasts 1
  • Longer survival, death often from non-MDS causes 1

Higher-risk MDS (IPSS Intermediate-2/High): 1

  • Bone marrow blasts 5-19% (RAEB-1 and RAEB-2) 1
  • Major risk of AML progression and short survival 1
  • Bone marrow failure (infection/hemorrhage) is leading cause of death before AML transformation 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.