What is the initial approach to evaluating and treating a patient presenting with back pain?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 30, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Differential Diagnosis for Back Pain

Primary Diagnostic Categories

The vast majority of back pain (>85%) is nonspecific mechanical low back pain, but your evaluation must systematically exclude serious pathology through targeted history and physical examination focused on red flags. 1

The American College of Physicians classifies low back pain into three broad categories that guide your diagnostic approach: 1

  • Nonspecific mechanical low back pain (>85% of cases) - musculoligamentous pain without identifiable structural cause 1
  • Back pain with radiculopathy or spinal stenosis (7% combined) - herniated disc with radiculopathy (4%) or spinal stenosis (~3%) 1
  • Back pain with specific underlying pathology (<2% combined) - serious conditions requiring urgent intervention 1

Red Flag Conditions Requiring Immediate Consideration

You must actively screen for these serious conditions because delayed diagnosis worsens outcomes: 2

Cauda Equina Syndrome (0.04% prevalence)

  • Urinary retention, fecal incontinence, saddle anesthesia, and motor deficits at multiple levels 1
  • Requires immediate MRI or CT and urgent neurosurgical consultation 3

Vertebral Malignancy (0.7% prevalence)

  • History of cancer increases posttest probability from 0.7% to 9% (positive likelihood ratio 14.7) 1
  • Unexplained weight loss, age >50, failure to improve with conservative therapy 3
  • Consider plain radiography or ESR (≥20 mm/h has 78% sensitivity, 67% specificity) with MRI for abnormalities 2

Spinal Infection (0.01% prevalence)

  • Fever, recent infection, IV drug use, or immunocompromised status 1
  • Midline tenderness with fever suggests vertebral infection 3
  • Obtain CBC, urinalysis, ESR, and MRI if suspected 4

Vertebral Compression Fracture (4% prevalence)

  • History of osteoporosis, steroid use, or significant trauma 2
  • Midline tenderness in high-risk patients 3
  • Plain radiography is appropriate initial imaging 2

Ankylosing Spondylitis/Axial Spondyloarthritis (0.3-5% in chronic low back pain)

  • Age <45 years, morning stiffness >30 minutes that improves with movement and worsens with rest 1
  • Inflammatory pain pattern distinguishes this from mechanical pain 1
  • Early diagnosis critical as TNF-blocking agents show strong efficacy when disease duration <10 years 1

Radiculopathy and Spinal Stenosis

Herniated Disc with Radiculopathy (4% prevalence)

  • Sciatica with associated paraspinal muscle spasm 1
  • Positive straight leg raise test, dermatomal sensory changes, motor weakness in specific nerve root distribution 3
  • Most improve within 4 weeks with noninvasive management 1

Spinal Stenosis (3% prevalence)

  • Pseudoclaudication (leg pain with walking that improves with rest or forward flexion) 1
  • Bilateral leg symptoms, older age 3
  • Most improve within 4 weeks with noninvasive management 1

Clinical Approach to Differentiation

Use pain pattern characteristics to guide your differential: 1

  • Mechanical pain pattern (worsens with activity, improves with rest) → nonspecific mechanical low back pain with myofascial involvement 1
  • Inflammatory pain pattern (morning stiffness >30 minutes, improves with movement, worsens with rest) → spondyloarthritis 1
  • Neurologic symptoms (radicular pain, motor weakness, sensory deficits) → radiculopathy or spinal stenosis 1

Imaging Strategy

Do not routinely obtain imaging in patients with nonspecific low back pain without red flags, as this does not improve outcomes and may lead to unnecessary interventions. 2, 1

When to Image Immediately:

  • Severe or progressive neurologic deficits 2
  • Suspected cauda equina syndrome 2
  • Suspected cancer with impending spinal cord compression 2
  • Suspected vertebral infection 2
  • MRI is preferred over CT (avoids radiation, better soft tissue visualization) 2, 3

When to Consider Delayed Imaging:

  • Plain radiography for suspected vertebral compression fracture in high-risk patients (osteoporosis, steroid use) 2
  • Plain radiography may be reasonable for persistent symptoms after 4-6 weeks of conservative therapy without red flags 2, 3
  • Consider imaging at 1 month for persistent, unimproved symptoms 2

Psychosocial Risk Factors for Chronicity

Assess for yellow flags that predict poorer outcomes and chronic disability: 2

  • Depression, passive coping strategies, job dissatisfaction 2
  • Higher disability levels, disputed compensation claims, somatization 2
  • Use STarT Back tool at 2 weeks to risk-stratify patients and direct resources appropriately 3

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Routine imaging for uncomplicated acute low back pain exposes patients to unnecessary radiation without clinical benefit (single lumbar spine x-ray equals daily chest x-ray for >1 year in gonadal radiation) 2, 1
  • Overlooking inflammatory causes in younger patients (<45 years) with chronic symptoms and morning stiffness delays access to highly effective TNF-blocking agents 1
  • Failing to recognize cauda equina syndrome leads to permanent neurologic disability from delayed surgical decompression 2
  • Missing cancer in patients with prior malignancy - the posttest probability jumps from 0.7% to 9% in this population 1

References

Guideline

Differential Diagnoses for Low Back Pain with Muscle Knots

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Emergency Department Evaluation and Management of Low Back Pain

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.