Are procedures associated with codes 20930, 22551, 22845, 22853, C1713, and C1762 medically necessary?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 1, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Medical Necessity Determination for Spinal Fusion Procedure Codes

The requested procedure codes 20930 (allograft for spine surgery), 22551 (anterior interbody arthrodesis), 22845 (anterior instrumentation), 22853 (biomechanical device insertion), C1713 (anchor/screw for opposing bone-to-bone), and C1762 (connective tissue) represent components of an anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) procedure, which requires specific clinical indications to establish medical necessity, including documented failure of conservative management, neurological compromise, or structural instability with correlation to the provided diagnosis.

Understanding the Procedure Codes

These CPT and HCPCS codes represent distinct but complementary components of spinal fusion surgery 1, 2:

  • Code 20930: Allograft (morselized or structural bone graft material)
  • Code 22551: Anterior interbody arthrodesis (the actual fusion procedure at one interspace)
  • Code 22845: Anterior instrumentation (plates, screws for stabilization)
  • Code 22853: Biomechanical device insertion (interbody cage or spacer)
  • Code C1713: Anchor/screw for bone-to-bone fixation
  • Code C1762: Connective tissue/biological material

These codes are used together to describe the complete surgical intervention and must be supported by appropriate diagnostic codes (ICD-10) that justify the medical necessity 2, 3.

Medical Necessity Criteria

Medical necessity for spinal fusion procedures requires documentation of specific clinical conditions that cannot be adequately managed with conservative treatment 3.

Primary Indications That Support Medical Necessity

The diagnosis provided must demonstrate one or more of the following:

  • Degenerative disc disease with mechanical instability causing persistent, disabling pain despite 6+ months of conservative management including physical therapy, medications, and injections 3
  • Spondylolisthesis (vertebral slippage) with neurological symptoms or progressive deformity 3
  • Spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication unresponsive to conservative care 3
  • Post-laminectomy syndrome with documented instability 3
  • Traumatic fracture requiring stabilization 3
  • Infection (discitis/osteomyelitis) requiring debridement and fusion 3
  • Tumor requiring vertebral body reconstruction 3
  • Deformity correction (scoliosis, kyphosis) with documented progression 3

Documentation Requirements

For medical necessity determination, the medical record must contain 3:

  • Specific diagnosis with ICD-10 code that correlates with the anatomical level being treated
  • Imaging confirmation (MRI, CT, or X-ray) showing pathology at the surgical level
  • Failed conservative treatment documentation for degenerative conditions (minimum 6 months unless acute trauma, infection, or progressive neurological deficit)
  • Neurological examination findings if neurological compromise is claimed
  • Functional impairment documentation affecting activities of daily living
  • Correlation between symptoms, examination findings, and imaging 3

Critical Pitfalls in Medical Necessity Determination

Do not approve these codes without verifying the diagnosis matches the anatomical level and laterality of the planned procedure 2, 3. Common errors include:

  • Mismatch between diagnosis code and procedure level: If the diagnosis indicates L4-L5 pathology but the procedure targets L5-S1, medical necessity is not established 3
  • Insufficient conservative treatment: Elective fusion for degenerative conditions without documented failure of non-operative management typically does not meet medical necessity criteria 3
  • Lack of imaging correlation: Symptoms alone without radiographic confirmation of pathology at the surgical level are insufficient 3
  • Inappropriate use of multiple codes: Code 22853 (biomechanical device) and code C1762 (connective tissue) may represent bundled services depending on payer policy and should not be separately reimbursed if considered inclusive 2

Specific Considerations for Code Combinations

The combination of codes 20930,22551,22845,22853, C1713, and C1762 suggests an anterior approach with instrumentation and interbody device placement 1, 2. This combination is medically necessary when:

  • The surgical approach (anterior vs. posterior) is justified by the specific pathology and anatomy 3
  • Instrumentation (22845, C1713) is required for stability based on the extent of decompression or structural compromise 3
  • The interbody device (22853) and bone graft material (20930, C1762) are necessary for achieving fusion 2, 3

Verify that the diagnosis supports the need for anterior rather than posterior approach, as some conditions are better addressed posteriorly, and payer policies may require justification for approach selection 3.

Final Determination Framework

Medical necessity is established when ALL of the following are documented 3:

  1. Diagnosis code accurately reflects the pathology requiring surgical intervention
  2. Imaging studies confirm structural pathology at the level to be treated
  3. Conservative treatment has failed (for non-emergent conditions) or is contraindicated
  4. Functional impairment is documented and correlates with the pathology
  5. The specific surgical approach and techniques (represented by the code combination) are appropriate for the documented diagnosis
  6. No contraindications exist that would make surgery inappropriate

Without access to the specific diagnosis code and clinical documentation, a definitive medical necessity determination cannot be made 2, 3. The codes themselves represent legitimate surgical procedures, but their medical necessity depends entirely on the clinical indication, patient-specific factors, and documentation quality.

References

Research

Insurance billing and coding.

Dental clinics of North America, 2008

Research

Overview of inpatient coding.

American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, 2003

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.