What are Duke's criteria for diagnosing infective endocarditis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 3, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Duke Criteria for Infective Endocarditis

The Modified Duke Criteria stratify patients with suspected infective endocarditis into three diagnostic categories—definite, possible, or rejected—using a combination of major and minor clinical, microbiological, and echocardiographic criteria. 1

Diagnostic Categories

Definite Infective Endocarditis can be established through either:

Pathological Criteria

  • Microorganisms demonstrated by culture or histological examination of a vegetation, embolized vegetation, or intracardiac abscess specimen 1
  • Pathological lesions showing active endocarditis on histological examination of vegetation or intracardiac abscess 1

Clinical Criteria (any one of the following)

  • 2 major criteria 1
  • 1 major criterion AND 3 minor criteria 1
  • 5 minor criteria 1

Possible Infective Endocarditis requires:

  • 1 major criterion AND 1 minor criterion 1
  • 3 minor criteria 1

Rejected Cases include:

  • Firm alternative diagnosis explaining evidence of IE 1
  • Resolution of IE syndrome with antibiotic therapy for ≤4 days 1
  • No pathological evidence of IE at surgery or autopsy after antibiotic therapy for ≤4 days 1
  • Does not meet criteria for possible IE 1

Major Criteria

Blood Culture Positive for IE

Typical microorganisms from 2 separate blood cultures:

  • Viridans streptococci 1
  • Streptococcus bovis 1
  • HACEK group organisms 1
  • Staphylococcus aureus (regardless of whether nosocomial or community-acquired, with or without removable focus) 1
  • Community-acquired enterococci in the absence of a primary focus 1

Important modification: The original Duke criteria only considered S. aureus bacteremia a major criterion if community-acquired, but the modified criteria expanded this to include nosocomial S. aureus bacteremia because 13% of hospital-acquired S. aureus bacteremia cases were subsequently diagnosed with definite IE. 1

Persistently positive blood cultures:

  • At least 2 positive cultures drawn >12 hours apart 1
  • All of 3, or majority of ≥4 separate blood cultures (with first and last drawn at least 1 hour apart) 1

Single positive blood culture for Coxiella burnetii OR anti-phase I IgG antibody titer >1:800 1

This was upgraded from a minor to major criterion because serological testing proved highly specific for Q fever endocarditis. 1

Evidence of Endocardial Involvement

Positive echocardiogram (TEE recommended for prosthetic valves, complicated IE, or paravalvular abscess; TTE as first test in other patients) showing: 1

  • Oscillating intracardiac mass on valve or supporting structures, in the path of regurgitant jets, or on implanted material without alternative anatomic explanation 1
  • Abscess 1
  • New partial dehiscence of prosthetic valve 1
  • New valvular regurgitation (worsening or changing of preexisting murmur is NOT sufficient) 1

Minor Criteria

  • Predisposition: Predisposing heart condition or injection drug use 1
  • Fever: Temperature ≥38°C 1
  • Vascular phenomena: Major arterial emboli, septic pulmonary infarcts, mycotic aneurysm, intracranial hemorrhage, conjunctival hemorrhages, Janeway lesions 1
  • Immunologic phenomena: Glomerulonephritis, Osler's nodes, Roth spots, rheumatoid factor 1
  • Microbiological evidence: Positive blood culture that does not meet major criterion OR serological evidence of active infection with organism consistent with IE 1

Critical modification: Echocardiographic minor criteria were eliminated from the modified Duke criteria because transesophageal echocardiography became widely available, making vague echocardiographic findings less diagnostically useful. 1

Common Pitfalls and Clinical Caveats

Blood culture-negative endocarditis remains a major diagnostic challenge, occurring in approximately 10% of cases when cultures are properly obtained. 2 The most common cause is prior antibiotic administration before blood cultures are drawn. 3 In one study, 63% of patients had received antibiotics prior to blood culture, resulting in 71% blood culture-negative IE. 3

Right-sided endocarditis may not present with classic peripheral embolic or immunologic phenomena because valve lesions do not create the same peripheral manifestations as left-sided disease, though septic pulmonary emboli can occur. 1

Acute versus subacute presentation: Acute IE (often S. aureus) may evolve too quickly for immunologic vascular phenomena to develop, which are more characteristic of subacute disease. 1

Prosthetic valve endocarditis has lower diagnostic sensitivity with Duke criteria—only 50% were classified as definite by the original Duke criteria compared to 83% for native valve endocarditis. 4

The Duke criteria demonstrated 80% sensitivity and high specificity across diverse patient populations including adults, pediatrics, injection drug users, and patients with both native and prosthetic valves. 1 However, 24% of pathologically proven IE cases may still be misclassified as "possible IE," particularly in culture-negative cases and Q fever endocarditis. 5

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Diagnosis and Management of Infective Endocarditis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Suggested modifications to the Duke criteria for the clinical diagnosis of native valve and prosthetic valve endocarditis: analysis of 118 pathologically proven cases.

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 1997

Research

Value and limitations of the Duke criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis.

Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1999

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.