What is Os Trigonum?
Os trigonum is an accessory bone located at the posterolateral aspect of the talus in the foot, present in approximately 9% of individuals, that forms when the lateral tubercle of the talus fails to fuse during secondary ossification. 1
Anatomical Characteristics
Location: The os trigonum sits posterolateral to the lateral tubercle of the talus, positioned between the posterior tibial malleolus and the calcaneus 2, 3
Prevalence: Present in 9.0% of feet overall, with bilateral occurrence in approximately 32.7% of cases 1
Geographic variation: Highest prevalence occurs in East Asian populations (11.0%) 1
Detection methods: Prevalence varies significantly by imaging modality:
- X-ray: 8.2%
- MRI: 24.2%
- CT: 21.0%
- Cadaveric dissection: 5.0% 1
Classification Types
Three distinct types have been identified based on CT three-dimensional imaging 4:
Type I (1.9% incidence): Smallest volume with macro-axis of 0.65±0.24 cm and minor axis of 0.41±0.23 cm 4
Type II (10.5% incidence): Largest volume with macro-axis of 0.89±0.31 cm and minor axis of 0.58±0.32 cm 4
Type III (14.7% incidence): Most common type with macro-axis of 0.74±0.23 cm and minor axis of 0.55±0.16 cm 4
Clinical Significance
Os trigonum is typically asymptomatic but becomes clinically relevant when it causes posterior ankle impingement syndrome (PAIS), particularly in athletes performing repetitive plantar flexion movements. 5
Os Trigonum Syndrome
Mechanism of injury: Repetitive plantar flexion causes compression of the os trigonum between the posterior tibial malleolus and calcaneus, leading to disruption of the synchondrosis with the lateral tubercle of talus 2, 3
High-risk activities: Predominantly affects ballet dancers (especially during pointe or demi-pointe positions) and soccer players performing push-off maneuvers 5
Clinical presentation: Pain localized anterior to the Achilles tendon, exacerbated by plantar flexion activities 5
Association with PAIS: Patients with PAIS are approximately 16 times more likely to have os trigonum compared to those without PAIS 1
Diagnostic Approach
Imaging Recommendations
MRI is the preferred imaging modality according to the American College of Radiology for evaluating os trigonum and related pathology, using thin-section protocols. 6
Radiography: Lateral ankle view in maximal plantar flexion typically reveals the os trigonum between the posterior tibial lip and calcaneus; however, it only demonstrates the bone itself and morphostructural changes, not soft tissue involvement 6, 5
CT imaging: The choice modality when fractures of posterior talus structures are suspected, offering multiplanar capability for detailed characterization of the ossicle and synchondrosis 6, 3
MRI advantages: Depicts associated soft tissue damage, bone marrow edema patterns, cartilage changes, and synchondrosis disruption that indicate abnormal mobility or pseudoarthrosis 6, 2
MRI Findings in Symptomatic Cases
Disruption of cartilaginous synchondrosis between the accessory bone and posterior tibial aspect (seen in 7/9 symptomatic patients) 2
Fluid effusion surrounding the os trigonum and adjacent soft tissues 2
Pseudoarthrosis with irregular bone margins and high-signal spots within cartilage 2
Associated flexor hallucis longus tenosynovitis (present in 6/9 symptomatic patients) 2, 5
Bone marrow edema or necrosis in severe cases 2
Imaging Protocol Specifics
Forced plantar flexion acquisitions: Particularly useful to demonstrate the mechanism of injury and compression between posterior tibia and calcaneus 2
Sagittal T2 sequences: Best demonstrate cartilage changes indicating synchondrosis disruption 2
Contrast administration: Not routinely performed for symptomatic accessory ossicles, though MR arthrography may demonstrate contrast within a disrupted synchondrosis 6
Important Clinical Pitfalls
Radiographic confusion: Os trigonum may be mistaken for fractures of the posterior process of the talus on plain radiographs 3
Actual fracture of os trigonum: Extremely rare but can occur with severe hyperplantarflexion injury; requires high index of suspicion and CT confirmation 3
Missed soft tissue pathology: Plain radiographs and CT have limited assessment of associated soft-tissue pathology or bone marrow edema compared to MRI 6
Asymptomatic presence: The mere presence of os trigonum on imaging does not confirm it as the pain source; clinical correlation is essential 5