What is the next best step in management for a patient with multiple myeloma and a 17p deletion who has achieved a partial response to bortezomib, lenalidomide (Revlimid), and dexamethasone (Decadron)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 3, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Proceed to Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) Followed by Lenalidomide Maintenance

For this 48-year-old patient with multiple myeloma harboring a high-risk 17p deletion who has achieved a partial response to bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRd), the next step is to proceed with high-dose melphalan (200 mg/m²) and autologous stem cell transplantation, followed by lenalidomide maintenance therapy. 1, 2

Rationale for ASCT in This Clinical Context

High-Risk Disease Requires Aggressive Consolidation

  • The presence of 17p deletion classifies this patient as high-risk multiple myeloma, which historically portends shorter progression-free survival (PFS) after transplantation 1, 3, 4
  • The patient has achieved a partial response (PR) to VRd induction—this is an appropriate depth of response to proceed to transplant, as responses typically deepen significantly post-ASCT 1, 2
  • In the IFM 2008 trial, VGPR rates improved from 58% post-induction to 70% post-transplant and reached 87% after consolidation therapy 1

Evidence Supporting ASCT After VRd Induction

  • The SWOG S0777 trial demonstrated that VRd induction followed by ASCT resulted in superior outcomes: median PFS of 43 months versus 30 months with lenalidomide-dexamethasone alone, and median overall survival (OS) of 75 months versus 64 months 1
  • A large cohort study (n=1,000) showed that VRd induction followed by ASCT achieved VGPR or better in 89.9% of patients, with median PFS of 65 months for the entire cohort 5
  • Even in high-risk patients, this approach yielded a median OS of 78.2 months and 5-year OS of 57% 5

Specific Treatment Algorithm

Step 1: Proceed to ASCT Without Delay

  • Administer high-dose melphalan 200 mg/m² followed by autologous stem cell infusion 2, 6
  • Transplant should occur within 6-12 months of diagnosis in eligible patients to maximize benefit 2
  • Do not delay transplant once adequate response (PR or better) is achieved, as prolonged lenalidomide exposure may impair stem cell mobilization 1, 2

Step 2: Consider Consolidation Therapy

  • After ASCT, consider 2 cycles of VRd consolidation to further deepen response 1, 2
  • The IFM 2008 trial demonstrated that consolidation improved VGPR rates from 70% post-transplant to 87% after consolidation 1

Step 3: Initiate Maintenance Therapy

  • Begin lenalidomide maintenance therapy after transplant and any consolidation, continuing until disease progression 1, 2
  • For high-risk patients with 17p deletion, consider bortezomib plus lenalidomide maintenance rather than lenalidomide alone 1, 4
  • One study specifically showed that adding bortezomib to long-term therapy in patients with p53 deletion (17p deletion) improved both PFS and OS 1

Why Other Options Are Not Appropriate

Do Not Continue Current Regimen Alone

  • Simply continuing VRd without ASCT would deprive this patient of the proven survival benefit of transplantation (median OS 75 months with ASCT vs 64 months without) 1
  • The patient has already received 3 cycles of bortezomib followed by lenalidomide-dexamethasone—this is sufficient induction therapy 1, 2

Do Not Switch to Melphalan-Based Triplet Without ASCT

  • Bortezomib-melphalan-dexamethasone (or melphalan-prednisone-bortezomib) is reserved for transplant-ineligible patients 1, 7
  • This 48-year-old patient is clearly transplant-eligible based on age and performance status (able to climb stairs, though with dyspnea)

Allogeneic Transplant Is Not Standard of Care

  • Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation is not a standard treatment option for multiple myeloma outside of clinical trials 1
  • While this patient has high-risk disease, the current standard approach is ASCT followed by maintenance, not allogeneic transplant

Critical Considerations for 17p Deletion

Enhanced Maintenance Strategy

  • The 17p deletion confers high-risk status and requires more aggressive maintenance 1, 4
  • Consider bortezomib-based maintenance in addition to lenalidomide, as this has shown OS improvement specifically in patients with p53 deletion 1
  • Continue maintenance therapy until progression, as high-risk patients may experience rapid and difficult-to-control relapse if not treated immediately 1

Monitoring Strategy

  • Perform myeloma workup every 3-6 months during maintenance, including serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP), immunofixation, free light chains, and complete blood count 8
  • Monitor for peripheral neuropathy given prior bortezomib exposure—consider dose modifications if grade ≥2 neuropathy develops 1, 6

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not delay transplant waiting for a deeper response—partial response is sufficient to proceed, and responses deepen post-ASCT 1, 2
  • Do not omit maintenance therapy in this high-risk patient—maintenance is critical for prolonging PFS and OS in 17p deletion patients 1, 4
  • Do not use lenalidomide maintenance alone in high-risk disease—consider adding bortezomib to the maintenance regimen 1, 4
  • Do not pursue allogeneic transplant outside of a clinical trial—this is not standard of care 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

High-Dose Melphalan with Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Treatment of multiple myeloma: a comprehensive review.

Clinical lymphoma & myeloma, 2009

Guideline

Management of Elevated Albumin in Myeloma Patients

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.