How do you differentiate between Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), and Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 4, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Differentiating CIDP, ALS, and GBS

Key Distinguishing Feature: Pattern and Timing of Weakness Progression

The most critical distinguishing feature is the temporal pattern of disease progression: GBS progresses rapidly over days to 4 weeks with areflexia, CIDP progresses over at least 8 weeks (often months) with areflexia, while ALS progresses over months to years with hyperreflexia and upper motor neuron signs. 1


Clinical Algorithm for Differentiation

Step 1: Assess Reflexes (Most Important Initial Distinction)

Areflexia or hyporeflexia:

  • Points toward GBS or CIDP 1, 2
  • Rules out ALS as the primary diagnosis

Hyperreflexia with pathologic reflexes (Babinski sign, clonus):

  • Strongly suggests ALS 1
  • These features cast doubt on GBS diagnosis 1

Step 2: Determine Progression Timeline

Rapid progression (days to <4 weeks to nadir):

  • GBS is the diagnosis 1
  • Typically reaches maximum disability within 2 weeks 1, 3
  • Monophasic course with subsequent plateau or improvement 1

Progression >8 weeks from onset:

  • Consider CIDP (either primary or acute-onset CIDP) 1, 4
  • If patient deteriorates after 8 weeks from initial onset, diagnose as acute-onset CIDP 4, 5
  • If deterioration occurs ≥3 times, strongly suggests CIDP rather than GBS with treatment-related fluctuations 4, 5

Slow, relentless progression over months to years:

  • ALS is most likely
  • Progressive weakness without sensory symptoms
  • Combination of upper and lower motor neuron signs

Step 3: Evaluate Sensory Involvement

Prominent sensory symptoms/signs:

  • Supports GBS or CIDP 1, 3
  • Distal paresthesias common in both 3

Absent or minimal sensory involvement:

  • Does not exclude GBS (pure motor variant exists) 1
  • ALS characteristically lacks sensory symptoms
  • Severe sensory signs with limited weakness at onset casts doubt on GBS 1

Step 4: Check for Upper Motor Neuron Signs

Presence of:

  • Spasticity
  • Hyperreflexia
  • Extensor plantar responses (Babinski sign)
  • Clonus

These features:

  • Are pathognomonic for ALS (combined with lower motor neuron signs)
  • Cast strong doubt on GBS diagnosis 1
  • Rule out CIDP

Step 5: Assess Autonomic Dysfunction

Dysautonomia (blood pressure/heart rate instability, pupillary dysfunction):

  • Common in GBS 1, 3
  • Less common in acute-onset CIDP 6
  • Rare in ALS (late finding if present)

Step 6: Evaluate Respiratory and Bulbar Involvement

Rapid respiratory failure:

  • Occurs in ~20% of GBS patients 2, 7
  • Less common in acute-onset CIDP (A-CIDP patients less likely to need mechanical ventilation) 6, 4
  • Late finding in ALS

Facial weakness:

  • Common in GBS (bilateral facial palsy characteristic) 1
  • Less common in A-CIDP 6
  • Can occur in ALS but with upper motor neuron features

Diagnostic Testing to Confirm

Cerebrospinal Fluid Analysis

Albumino-cytological dissociation (elevated protein, normal cell count):

  • Supports GBS or CIDP 1, 2, 3
  • Normal protein does not rule out GBS, especially early 1, 3

Elevated cell count (>50 × 10⁶/l):

  • Casts doubt on GBS diagnosis 1
  • Consider alternative diagnoses (infection, malignancy)

Normal CSF:

  • Does not exclude GBS
  • Typical for ALS

Electrodiagnostic Studies

Demyelinating features (prolonged distal latencies, conduction block, slow conduction velocities):

  • Confirms GBS (AIDP subtype) or CIDP 7
  • May not appear until 10-14 days after symptom onset 7
  • Follow-up studies at 3-8 weeks may help distinguish GBS from CIDP 1

Axonal features (reduced amplitudes, normal conduction velocities):

  • Suggests GBS (AMAN/AMSAN subtypes) 1
  • Can occur in CIDP

Chronic denervation with reinnervation:

  • Supports CIDP over GBS
  • Characteristic of ALS (with fibrillations and fasciculations)

Normal studies early:

  • Do not exclude GBS 1, 7
  • Repeat in 1-2 weeks if clinical suspicion high

Critical Timing Distinctions for GBS vs CIDP

Treatment-Related Fluctuations (TRF) vs Acute-Onset CIDP

GBS with TRF:

  • First fluctuation always occurs within 8 weeks (median 18 days) 4
  • Maximum of 2 fluctuations (31% have second TRF, none have more) 4
  • Patients more severely affected, often need ventilation 4
  • Cranial nerve dysfunction common 4

Acute-Onset CIDP:

  • Deterioration after 8 weeks from onset = CIDP 1, 4, 5
  • Three or more deteriorations = CIDP 1, 4, 5
  • Patients less severely affected, remain ambulatory 4
  • Rarely need artificial ventilation 4
  • Less cranial nerve dysfunction 4
  • More CIDP-like electrophysiologic abnormalities 4

Clinical implication: If patient deteriorates after 9 weeks or has ≥3 deteriorations, diagnose CIDP and initiate maintenance immunotherapy 4, 5


Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Pitfall 1: Assuming normal reflexes rule out GBS

  • Pure motor variant and AMAN subtype can have normal or even exaggerated reflexes 1
  • However, hyperreflexia with Babinski sign rules out GBS 1

Pitfall 2: Diagnosing GBS too quickly in slowly progressive cases

  • Progression >4 weeks should raise suspicion for CIDP or alternative diagnosis 1
  • Continued progression >4 weeks casts doubt on GBS 1

Pitfall 3: Missing acute-onset CIDP

  • ~5% of apparent GBS cases are actually acute-onset CIDP 1
  • Monitor for deteriorations beyond 8 weeks 4, 5

Pitfall 4: Overlooking sensory involvement in ALS

  • ALS should not have sensory symptoms or signs
  • If sensory findings present, reconsider diagnosis

Pitfall 5: Waiting for CSF or EMG before treating suspected GBS

  • GBS is a clinical diagnosis 2
  • Normal early studies do not exclude GBS 1, 7
  • Treatment should not be delayed for confirmatory testing in rapidly progressive cases

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Guillain-Barré Syndrome Diagnosis and Clinical Features

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guillain-Barré Syndrome Diagnosis and Clinical Presentation

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

[Acute-Onset Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy].

Brain and nerve = Shinkei kenkyu no shinpo, 2015

Guideline

Clinical Approach to Flaccid Quadriparesis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.