What is the frequency of endoscopy findings of gastritis and esophagitis in patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 4, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Frequency of Endoscopic Findings in GERD

The majority of GERD patients (50-80%) have normal endoscopy findings, while only 20-50% demonstrate erosive esophagitis, and gastritis findings are variable but less commonly the primary pathology. 1

Esophagitis Prevalence in GERD

  • Erosive esophagitis is found in only 20-50% of symptomatic GERD patients, meaning 50-80% have endoscopy-negative reflux disease (ENRD) despite typical symptoms 1

  • Among patients undergoing endoscopy for GERD symptoms, approximately 40-60% have no visible esophageal erosions and are classified as having "endoscopy-negative reflux disease" 2

  • Histologic evidence of esophagitis is more sensitive than endoscopic findings alone, with studies showing histologic esophagitis in 58.4% of GERD patients versus endoscopic esophagitis in 68.1%, and combined evaluation detecting esophagitis in 82% 3

  • In specialized populations with esophageal atresia repair, endoscopic esophagitis rates are higher (8-19% in adults, 20-49% in adolescents), with histologic esophagitis even more prevalent (25-51% in adults, 44-61% in adolescents) 1

Gastritis Findings in GERD

  • Gastritis is not a primary endoscopic feature of GERD, though it may coexist as a separate pathology 4

  • In one Middle Eastern study, 36% of GERD patients had endoscopic esophagitis, and active corpus gastritis due to H. pylori was actually associated with protection against severe erosive esophagitis 5

  • The relationship between gastritis and GERD is complex: patients with severe esophagitis (≥grade II) less frequently had active gastritis (15/45 vs. 55/98; p=0.02) and lower H. pylori density compared to those without esophagitis 5

Clinical Implications

  • Endoscopy cannot rule out GERD, as the absence of erosions does not exclude clinically significant reflux disease requiring treatment 1, 2

  • When endoscopy is performed, complete evaluation should document erosive esophagitis using standardized grading (Los Angeles classification), hiatal hernia presence, and Barrett's esophagus screening 1, 6

  • Histologic evaluation increases diagnostic sensitivity: nearly all patients with severe endoscopic changes show histologic esophagitis, but 43.7% of patients with normal-appearing mucosa also have histologic evidence of inflammation 3

  • In patients with typical GERD symptoms and normal endoscopy, ambulatory pH monitoring (preferably 96-hour wireless) is needed to objectively confirm reflux and guide long-term therapy decisions 1

Important Caveats

  • Los Angeles grade A esophagitis is not diagnostic of GERD, as it can be seen in healthy asymptomatic volunteers 1

  • Endoscopy is primarily indicated for alarm symptoms (dysphagia, bleeding, anemia, weight loss), refractory symptoms despite 4-8 weeks of twice-daily PPI therapy, or screening for Barrett's esophagus in high-risk patients 1, 6

  • The presence of gastritis should prompt evaluation for H. pylori and NSAID use as separate etiologies rather than being attributed to GERD itself 4, 5

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Endoscopic evaluation of gastro-esophageal reflux disease.

The Yale journal of biology and medicine, 1999

Guideline

Diagnosis and Management of Peptic Ulcer Disease with Gastritis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Corpus gastritis and erosive esophagitis: a report from the Middle East.

Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology, 2006

Guideline

Indications for Endoscopy in GERD Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.