What is the evidence for using L-glutamine (L-glutamine) supplementation in medical treatment?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 4, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

L-Glutamine Supplementation: Evidence-Based Recommendations

Primary Recommendation

L-glutamine supplementation is NOT recommended for general use in critically ill patients, cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy/radiotherapy, or most hospitalized patients, as recent high-quality evidence shows no mortality benefit and potential harm in certain populations. 1, 2


Specific Clinical Scenarios Where Glutamine MAY Be Beneficial

Parenteral Nutrition in Severe Acute Pancreatitis

  • When enteral nutrition is not feasible, parenteral glutamine at 0.20 g/kg/day should be supplemented, as it reduces infectious complications, mortality, and hospital stay in patients requiring total parenteral nutrition. 3
  • This represents one of the few scenarios with consistent evidence supporting glutamine use. 3

Surgical Patients on Exclusive Parenteral Nutrition

  • Parenteral glutamine (0.35-0.5 g/kg/day) may be considered ONLY for surgical patients who cannot be fed enterally and require exclusive PN. 2
  • This is a weak recommendation due to mixed evidence, with the largest trials showing no effect on surgical morbidity or mortality. 3, 2
  • One meta-analysis found only a modest reduction in hospital length of stay. 3

Clinical Scenarios Where Glutamine Is NOT Recommended or Contraindicated

Critical Illness with Multi-Organ Failure

  • Do NOT use glutamine in critically ill patients with multi-organ failure or organ dysfunction—it is associated with INCREASED mortality. 2, 4
  • The Society of Critical Care Medicine explicitly reports increased mortality with high-dose glutamine in this population. 2

Cancer Treatment

  • ESPEN states there are insufficient consistent clinical data to recommend glutamine during conventional cytotoxic therapy, targeted therapy, or radiotherapy. 1, 3, 2
  • The Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and International Society for Oral Oncology (ISOO) recommend AGAINST intravenous glutamine for preventing oral mucositis in patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy. 3
  • Major safety concern: Glutamine is metabolized at high rates by cancer cells and has been associated with higher tumor relapse rates in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients. 3

Acute Kidney Injury or Chronic Kidney Disease

  • The National Kidney Foundation recommends AGAINST high-dose parenteral glutamine in acute kidney injury or chronic kidney disease with kidney failure. 2

Radiation-Induced Complications

  • There are insufficient consistent clinical data to recommend glutamine to prevent radiation-induced enteritis/diarrhea, stomatitis, esophagitis, or skin toxicity. 1

The Evolution of Glutamine Evidence: Why Recommendations Changed

Historical Context

  • Early meta-analyses and small studies suggested mortality reduction and decreased infectious complications with glutamine supplementation. 1, 5, 6
  • The hypothesis that glutamine becomes "conditionally essential" during critical illness led to widespread recommendations for supplementation. 1, 5

Recent High-Quality Evidence Changed the Landscape

  • The glutamine story is over in the sense that the hypothesis that ALL critically ill patients should receive glutamine has been demonstrated to be invalid. 1
  • Recent large, well-designed studies failed to show mortality benefit in primary analyses. 1
  • The 2012 Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines noted that although previous meta-analyses showed mortality reduction, four subsequent meta-analyses did not confirm this benefit. 1
  • Indiscriminate use of glutamine supplementation in critically ill patients may actually cause harm rather than beneficial effects. 1

Route of Administration Matters

  • Beneficial effects were found mostly in trials using parenteral rather than enteral glutamine. 1
  • Studies involving patients on enteral nutrition with enterally administered supplementation are less likely to show beneficial effects. 1
  • However, even recent well-sized studies with parenteral glutamine could not demonstrate reduction of infectious complications or organ dysfunction. 1

Dosing Considerations (When Appropriate)

Parenteral Route

  • Severe acute pancreatitis: 0.20 g/kg/day 3
  • Surgical patients on exclusive PN: 0.35-0.5 g/kg/day 2
  • HSCT patients (per ASPEN): approximately 0.6 g/kg/day 2 (though ESPEN states insufficient evidence 2)

Enteral Route

  • High-dose enteral glutamine (≥30 g/day) was used in older studies, but current evidence does not support routine use. 5

Monitoring and Safety Considerations

Plasma Glutamine Levels

  • Low plasma glutamine concentration at ICU admission is an independent mortality predictor. 1
  • The hypothesis that SOME critically ill patients may have hypoglutaminemia requiring correction has not been tested appropriately. 1
  • Most patients will normalize plasma glutamine concentration by adding 20-25 g/24 hours. 6

Contraindications and Cautions

  • Severe liver disease: Use with caution due to glutamine's role in ammonia metabolism. 4
  • Patients with significant comorbidities, particularly liver or kidney disease. 4
  • Avoid high-dose supplementation in all patients. 2, 4

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  1. Do not extrapolate older meta-analyses to current practice—the most recent large trials show no benefit or potential harm. 1

  2. Do not assume enteral glutamine has the same effects as parenteral—route of administration significantly influences outcomes. 1

  3. Do not use glutamine as a general immune-modulating supplement—there is no sign of clear benefit in clinical trials for this purpose. 1

  4. Do not supplement glutamine in cancer patients based on theoretical benefits—the risk of tumor stimulation is a major unresolved safety issue. 3

  5. Do not ignore organ dysfunction status—glutamine in multi-organ failure is associated with increased mortality. 2

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Glutathione and Glutamine in Clinical Practice

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

L-Glutamine Supplementation in Specific Clinical Conditions

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Glutamine Supplementation in Anxiety

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Clinical applications of L-glutamine: past, present, and future.

Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 2003

Research

Clinical use of glutamine supplementation.

The Journal of nutrition, 2008

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.