Is Glutamine Supplementation Safe and Beneficial?
Glutamine supplementation is not recommended for generally healthy adults or for most patients with medical conditions including inflammatory bowel disease, cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy/radiotherapy, or critically ill patients, with the narrow exception of patients requiring exclusive parenteral nutrition who cannot be fed enterally. 1, 2, 3
Safety Profile and Contraindications
High-dose glutamine is contraindicated in critically ill patients with organ dysfunction, as it has been associated with increased mortality. 2, 4 Specifically:
- Do not use in patients with acute kidney injury or chronic kidney disease with kidney failure 4, 5
- Do not use in critically ill patients with multi-organ failure, where increased mortality has been documented 5, 6
- Large multicenter trials (REDOXS and MetaPlus) demonstrated trends toward increased 28-day mortality and significantly increased 6-month mortality in ventilated ICU patients receiving glutamine 6
Evidence for Specific Conditions
Cancer Patients
There is insufficient evidence to recommend glutamine supplementation during conventional chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or targeted therapy. 1, 2, 5 The evidence is heterogeneous:
- Some small studies showed benefits for mucositis, while larger placebo-controlled trials showed no effect 1
- Concerns exist about glutamine potentially fueling cancer cell metabolism 2
- One trial in autologous transplant patients reported more severe oral mucositis and increased relapses in the glutamine group 1
- Exception: Patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) may receive parenteral glutamine at 0.6 g/kg/day, though evidence remains mixed 5
Inflammatory Bowel Disease (Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis)
Glutamine supplementation has no effect on disease course in IBD patients. 3 A systematic review of seven studies found:
- No effect on disease activity, intestinal permeability, or inflammatory markers 2, 3
- No changes in anthropometric or biochemical parameters regardless of route (oral, enteral, or parenteral) 3
Surgical Patients
Parenteral glutamine may be considered only in surgical patients requiring exclusive parenteral nutrition who cannot be fed enterally, at a dose of 0.35-0.5 g/kg/day. 1, 4 However:
- The recommendation is weak due to conflicting evidence 1, 5
- Most surgical patients do not require exclusive parenteral nutrition for 5-7 days, particularly after elective colorectal surgery 1
- Meta-analyses showed some benefits for infections and length of stay, but studies were underpowered with methodological concerns 1
Generally Healthy Adults
There is no evidence supporting glutamine supplementation in healthy individuals. 2 The clinical significance of increased intestinal secretory IgA as a standalone outcome is uncertain and does not translate into meaningful clinical benefits that would justify routine supplementation 2
Clinical Decision Algorithm
Assess nutritional route capability: Can the patient tolerate enteral nutrition? 4
- If yes → Do not use glutamine (standard nutrition is sufficient)
- If no → Proceed to step 2
Evaluate for contraindications: 4, 5
- Acute kidney injury or chronic kidney disease? → Contraindicated
- Multi-organ failure or critical illness with organ dysfunction? → Contraindicated
- If no contraindications → Proceed to step 3
Determine specific indication: 1, 4, 5
- Exclusive parenteral nutrition required AND cannot be fed enterally? → May consider 0.5 g/kg/day parenteral glutamine
- HSCT patient? → May consider 0.6 g/kg/day parenteral glutamine
- All other situations → Do not use
Important Caveats
- Oral glutamine supplementation has insufficient evidence for any clinical indication 1
- The combination of parenteral glutamine with oral/enteral nutrition lacks supporting data 1
- Most commercially available parenteral nutrition formulations do not contain glutamine, requiring separate supplementation if indicated 7
- Despite biological plausibility and some positive metabolic effects, glutamine has not demonstrated consistent improvements in morbidity, mortality, or quality of life outcomes that would justify widespread use 2