Conservative Management for Epidural Hematoma
Conservative management of epidural hematoma is appropriate for neurologically stable patients with small hematomas (<1.5 cm diameter), minimal midline shift (<2 mm), and no signs of active bleeding or mass effect, but requires intensive neurological monitoring and serial CT imaging to detect deterioration. 1, 2, 3
Patient Selection Criteria for Conservative Management
Favorable Indicators for Non-Operative Management
- Hematoma diameter ≤1.5 cm on initial CT scan 3
- Midline shift ≤2 mm 3
- Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score maintained at normal levels without deterioration 2
- No clinical signs of intracranial hypertension (headache severity, vomiting, altered consciousness) 1
- Absence of pupillary abnormalities or hemiparesis 3
- No lucent areas within the hematoma on CT (which suggest active bleeding) 3
High-Risk Features Requiring Surgical Consideration
- Skull fracture crossing a meningeal artery, vein, or major dural sinus (55% deterioration rate) 2
- CT diagnosis within 6 hours of trauma (43% deterioration rate) 2
- Patients with both risk factors have 71% chance of requiring surgical evacuation 2
- Evidence of uncal herniation on CT imaging 3
- Central lucent areas within the hematoma indicating ongoing hemorrhage 3
Monitoring Protocol
Neurological Assessment
- Perform neurological examinations at minimum every 4 hours initially, assessing GCS score, pupillary response, motor strength, and sensory function 4
- Any decline in GCS score, new pupillary dilatation, or development of hemiparesis mandates immediate surgical consultation 3
Imaging Surveillance
- Obtain repeat CT scan within 6-12 hours of initial diagnosis 2
- Continue serial CT imaging every 24-48 hours until hematoma demonstrates stability or resorption 1
- Any increase in hematoma size or midline shift requires immediate surgical re-evaluation 1
Coagulation Management
Reversal of Anticoagulation
- Reverse anticoagulation immediately if present 5
- Target platelet count >100 × 10⁹/L before any potential surgical intervention 5
- Correct INR to <1.4 in warfarin-treated patients 5
Thromboprophylaxis Timing
- Consider thromboprophylaxis only after hemostasis is secured and hematoma stability is confirmed on serial imaging 5
Expected Timeline for Resolution
Natural History
- Most conservatively managed epidural hematomas show progressive resorption over weeks to months 1
- Patients diagnosed >6 hours after trauma have only 13% risk of requiring delayed evacuation 2
- 32% of initially asymptomatic patients may require delayed surgery 1-10 days after initial trauma 2
Absolute Indications for Surgical Conversion
Clinical Deterioration
- Neurological deterioration of any degree 6, 4
- Decreased level of consciousness 4
- Development or worsening of focal neurological deficits 4
Radiological Progression
- Increased intracranial pressure refractory to medical management 4
- Progressive increase in hematoma size on serial CT 1
- Increasing mass effect or midline shift 4
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not delay surgical intervention if neurological deterioration occurs, as this leads to significantly worse outcomes 4
- Never assume stability based on initial presentation alone—32% of initially asymptomatic patients deteriorate 2
- Avoid conservative management in patients with skull fractures crossing major vessels diagnosed within 6 hours of trauma (71% surgical rate) 2
- Do not miss lucent areas within the hematoma on CT, which indicate active bleeding and predict deterioration 3
- Recognize that even small hematomas require surgery if accompanied by clinical signs of neurological dysfunction 3
Special Populations
Spinal Epidural Hematoma
- Conservative management may be considered only for patients with incomplete neurological deficits, non-progressive symptoms, and good baseline neurological condition 7, 8
- Lesions extending <4 vertebral segments have better outcomes 7
- Progression interval ≤12 hours predicts worse preoperative neurological deficit and outcome 7
- Presence of spinal cord edema on MRI predicts worse outcome and may favor surgical intervention 7