Routine Follow-Up After Acute Pulmonary Embolism
All patients should undergo routine clinical evaluation at 3-6 months after acute PE to assess for symptoms, VTE recurrence, bleeding complications, and potential chronic thromboembolic complications. 1
Timeline and Core Assessment at 3-6 Months
The 3-6 month follow-up visit is a Class I recommendation with Level B evidence and serves multiple critical purposes 1:
- Assess for persistent or new-onset dyspnea and functional limitation using standardized scales (Medical Research Council dyspnea scale or WHO functional class) 1
- Screen for VTE recurrence, occult malignancy, and bleeding complications from anticoagulation 1
- Decide on anticoagulation duration and dose after the initial treatment period 1
- Evaluate for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) risk factors and symptoms 1, 2
Risk-Stratified Approach to Further Investigation
For Symptomatic Patients (Dyspnea or Functional Limitation Present)
If patients report persistent or new dyspnea/exercise limitation at 3-6 months, further diagnostic evaluation should be pursued 1:
- Consider transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) if ≥1 symptom is present 1
- Obtain NT-proBNP levels - elevated levels warrant further workup 1
- Perform V/Q scan as the key diagnostic test 1, 2
- If mismatched perfusion defects are found on V/Q scan >3 months after PE, refer to a pulmonary hypertension/CTEPH expert center (Class I recommendation) 1
For Asymptomatic Patients
Routine follow-up imaging (CT pulmonary angiography) is NOT recommended for asymptomatic patients after completing appropriate anticoagulation 2:
- The pulmonary arterial bed is restored in the majority of patients within the first few months 2
- However, consider further evaluation in asymptomatic patients with high-risk features for CTEPH 1:
- Advanced age
- Cardiac or pulmonary comorbidity
- Higher body mass index
- History of smoking
- Higher systolic pulmonary arterial pressure at diagnosis
- Right ventricular dysfunction at initial presentation
- Residual pulmonary vascular obstruction at discharge 2
Integrated Care Model
An integrated model of patient care involving hospital specialists, appropriately qualified nurses, and primary care physicians is recommended (Class I, Level C) 1:
- Ensures optimal transition from hospital to community care 1
- Includes standardized treatment protocols and regular monitoring 1
- Facilitates early detection of complications including CTEPH, which can develop in up to 4% of patients 3
Key Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not lose patients to follow-up - systematic follow-up is essential as up to 47% of PE patients may have reduced maximal aerobic capacity at one year 2
- Do not routinely image asymptomatic patients - this leads to unnecessary radiation exposure and healthcare costs 2
- Do not delay referral to CTEPH centers when V/Q scan shows mismatched perfusion defects, as early detection improves outcomes 1
- Do not forget to reassess anticoagulation decisions at 3-6 months, as there is lifelong VTE recurrence risk except in cases provoked by strong transient factors 1
Beyond 6 Months
After the initial 3-6 month evaluation, recommend regular follow-up examinations (e.g., yearly intervals) for patients on extended anticoagulation 1:
- Reassess bleeding risk versus VTE recurrence risk
- Monitor for late complications including post-PE syndrome
- Adjust anticoagulation dose if continuing beyond 6 months (consider reduced-dose apixaban or rivaroxaban) 1
Incomplete reperfusion persists in approximately 19-26% of patients even after 24 months, emphasizing the importance of sustained clinical vigilance 3.