What is the recommended routine follow-up investigation timeline after the acute period of a pulmonary embolism (PE)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 5, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Routine Follow-Up After Acute Pulmonary Embolism

All patients should undergo routine clinical evaluation at 3-6 months after acute PE to assess for symptoms, VTE recurrence, bleeding complications, and potential chronic thromboembolic complications. 1

Timeline and Core Assessment at 3-6 Months

The 3-6 month follow-up visit is a Class I recommendation with Level B evidence and serves multiple critical purposes 1:

  • Assess for persistent or new-onset dyspnea and functional limitation using standardized scales (Medical Research Council dyspnea scale or WHO functional class) 1
  • Screen for VTE recurrence, occult malignancy, and bleeding complications from anticoagulation 1
  • Decide on anticoagulation duration and dose after the initial treatment period 1
  • Evaluate for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) risk factors and symptoms 1, 2

Risk-Stratified Approach to Further Investigation

For Symptomatic Patients (Dyspnea or Functional Limitation Present)

If patients report persistent or new dyspnea/exercise limitation at 3-6 months, further diagnostic evaluation should be pursued 1:

  1. Consider transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) if ≥1 symptom is present 1
  2. Obtain NT-proBNP levels - elevated levels warrant further workup 1
  3. Perform V/Q scan as the key diagnostic test 1, 2
  4. If mismatched perfusion defects are found on V/Q scan >3 months after PE, refer to a pulmonary hypertension/CTEPH expert center (Class I recommendation) 1

For Asymptomatic Patients

Routine follow-up imaging (CT pulmonary angiography) is NOT recommended for asymptomatic patients after completing appropriate anticoagulation 2:

  • The pulmonary arterial bed is restored in the majority of patients within the first few months 2
  • However, consider further evaluation in asymptomatic patients with high-risk features for CTEPH 1:
    • Advanced age
    • Cardiac or pulmonary comorbidity
    • Higher body mass index
    • History of smoking
    • Higher systolic pulmonary arterial pressure at diagnosis
    • Right ventricular dysfunction at initial presentation
    • Residual pulmonary vascular obstruction at discharge 2

Integrated Care Model

An integrated model of patient care involving hospital specialists, appropriately qualified nurses, and primary care physicians is recommended (Class I, Level C) 1:

  • Ensures optimal transition from hospital to community care 1
  • Includes standardized treatment protocols and regular monitoring 1
  • Facilitates early detection of complications including CTEPH, which can develop in up to 4% of patients 3

Key Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not lose patients to follow-up - systematic follow-up is essential as up to 47% of PE patients may have reduced maximal aerobic capacity at one year 2
  • Do not routinely image asymptomatic patients - this leads to unnecessary radiation exposure and healthcare costs 2
  • Do not delay referral to CTEPH centers when V/Q scan shows mismatched perfusion defects, as early detection improves outcomes 1
  • Do not forget to reassess anticoagulation decisions at 3-6 months, as there is lifelong VTE recurrence risk except in cases provoked by strong transient factors 1

Beyond 6 Months

After the initial 3-6 month evaluation, recommend regular follow-up examinations (e.g., yearly intervals) for patients on extended anticoagulation 1:

  • Reassess bleeding risk versus VTE recurrence risk
  • Monitor for late complications including post-PE syndrome
  • Adjust anticoagulation dose if continuing beyond 6 months (consider reduced-dose apixaban or rivaroxaban) 1

Incomplete reperfusion persists in approximately 19-26% of patients even after 24 months, emphasizing the importance of sustained clinical vigilance 3.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Follow-up Imaging for Pulmonary Embolism

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Reperfusion after pulmonary embolism - long-term follow-up, risk factors, clinical impact.

Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia, 2018

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.