What is the management approach for a patient with gross hematuria and a bladder hematoma?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 5, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management of Gross Hematuria with Bladder Hematoma

Immediately perform retrograde cystography with at least 300 mL of contrast via retrograde gravity filling to diagnose bladder perforation, as bladder hematomas can cause bladder wall ulceration and perforation requiring urgent surgical intervention. 1, 2

Immediate Diagnostic Evaluation

Obtain CT cystography as the gold standard imaging modality, which has 85-100% accuracy for diagnosing bladder perforation and simultaneously evaluates for other injuries. 1 Look for:

  • Intraperitoneal perforation: Contrast outlining bowel loops and filling intraabdominal spaces 1
  • Extraperitoneal perforation: Contrast confined to the pelvis 1
  • Associated pelvic fractures: Present in 29% of patients with gross hematuria and bladder rupture 1

Critical pitfall: Do not perform inadequate cystography by clamping a Foley catheter and relying on IV contrast accumulation—this technique misses bladder injuries. 3

Risk Stratification and Urologic Referral

Refer all patients with gross hematuria for immediate urologic evaluation, even if self-limited. 4 The risk of malignancy with gross hematuria exceeds 10%, and bladder perforation from hematoma pressure represents a surgical emergency. 5, 2

Specifically inquire about:

  • History of pelvic trauma or recent vascular procedures 2
  • Inability to void or low urine output 3
  • Abdominal distention or suprapubic pain 3
  • Elevated BUN/creatinine suggesting intraperitoneal rupture 3

Management Algorithm Based on Perforation Type

Intraperitoneal Bladder Perforation

Perform immediate surgical repair for all intraperitoneal perforations (Grade B evidence) due to risk of peritonitis and sepsis. 1 This is a Standard recommendation that should not be delayed.

Extraperitoneal Bladder Perforation

Manage uncomplicated extraperitoneal injuries with catheter drainage for 2-3 weeks, as over 85% heal within 10 days with catheter drainage alone. 1

Perform surgical repair for complicated extraperitoneal injuries including: 1

  • Large extraperitoneal bladder injuries
  • Bladder neck involvement
  • Concurrent rectal or vaginal injury
  • Adjacent orthopedic implants
  • Penetrating injuries with pelvic trajectories

Hemodynamically Unstable Patients

Delay surgical repair until stabilization is achieved. 1 Consider bilateral nephrostomy combined with urinary catheterization as a temporizing measure. 1

Catheter Management and Clot Prevention

Maintain continuous bladder drainage to prevent clot retention and overdistention. 1 Replace the catheter if inadequate drainage is suspected or if the current catheter is causing ongoing trauma. 3

Follow up with cystography to confirm healing in complex repairs before catheter removal. 1

Special Consideration: Hematoma Without Perforation

If imaging reveals a bladder hematoma without perforation, consider that the hematoma itself can cause delayed ulceration and perforation through pressure necrosis of the bladder wall. 2 One case report documented a pelvic hematoma from femoral artery injury that initially caused extraperitoneal perforation, which later transformed to intraperitoneal perforation through the absorbed hematoma. 2

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

Do not attribute hematuria solely to anticoagulation without ruling out structural bladder injury, as 29% of patients with pelvic fracture and gross hematuria have bladder rupture. 1, 3

Do not delay imaging in patients with pelvic fracture and gross hematuria—this represents a surgical emergency requiring immediate diagnosis. 1, 3

Do not dismiss gross hematuria even if self-limited, as it carries significantly higher cancer risk and may indicate serious underlying pathology. 4

Follow-Up After Treatment

Pursue evaluation even if the patient is receiving antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy, as these medications do not explain structural causes of hematuria. 4, 3

Do not obtain urinary cytology or urine-based molecular markers in the initial evaluation of gross hematuria—these are low-yield and not recommended. 4, 3

References

Guideline

Management of Bladder Perforation with Hematuria

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Management of Hematuria Associated with a Foley Catheter

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Hematuria.

Primary care, 2019

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.