What tests are recommended before undergoing a coronary angiogram?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 5, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Pre-Coronary Angiography Testing

Before proceeding to coronary angiography, patients should undergo clinical risk assessment, ECG, basic laboratory testing including troponins and renal function, and—in most cases—non-invasive testing (CCTA for low-moderate risk, functional imaging for moderate-high risk) unless they present with severe refractory symptoms, very high clinical likelihood of disease, or hemodynamic instability. 1

Initial Clinical Assessment and Basic Testing

Mandatory Baseline Evaluation

  • Clinical risk stratification using age, ECG findings, anginal threshold, presence of diabetes, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is required before any invasive procedure 1
  • 12-lead ECG must be obtained to assess for ST-segment changes, prior infarction, conduction abnormalities, and left ventricular hypertrophy 1
  • Laboratory testing should include:
    • Troponin T or I (Class I recommendation) 1
    • CK-MB 1
    • Renal function (creatinine/eGFR) to assess contrast nephropathy risk 1
    • High-sensitivity C-reactive protein and/or fibrinogen should be considered (Class IIa) 1

Pre-Test Probability Assessment

  • Estimate pre-test likelihood of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) using the Risk Factor-weighted Clinical Likelihood model 1
  • Adjust this estimate using peripheral artery examination findings, resting ECG abnormalities, resting echocardiography results, and presence of vascular calcifications on prior imaging 1

Non-Invasive Testing Strategy (Risk-Stratified Approach)

Very Low Risk (≤5% Pre-Test Probability)

  • Defer further diagnostic testing (Class IIa recommendation) 1
  • Coronary angiography is not recommended in asymptomatic patients with no evidence of ischemia 1

Low to Moderate Risk (>5%–50% Pre-Test Probability)

  • Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) is the preferred initial test (Class I recommendation) 1
  • CCTA excels at ruling out obstructive disease with high negative predictive value (99.6% in vessel-based analysis) 2
  • Coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS) should be considered in the low range (>5%–15%) to reclassify patients and identify those with very low likelihood 1
  • If CCTA is non-diagnostic or shows CAD of uncertain functional significance, proceed to functional imaging 1

Moderate to High Risk (>15%–85% Pre-Test Probability)

Functional imaging is recommended as the initial test (Class I) 1:

  • Stress echocardiography with assessment of wall motion abnormalities (≥3 of 16 segments with stress-induced hypokinesia/akinesia indicates high risk) 1
  • SPECT or preferably PET myocardial perfusion imaging to diagnose and quantify ischemia (≥10% of LV myocardium indicates high risk) 1
  • Stress CMR perfusion imaging to diagnose ischemia and scar (≥2 of 16 segments with perfusion defects indicates high risk) 1

Very High Risk (>85% Pre-Test Probability)

  • Proceed directly to invasive coronary angiography without non-invasive testing if severe symptoms are refractory to medical therapy, angina occurs at low exercise levels, or there is hemodynamic instability (Class I) 1

Specific Clinical Scenarios Requiring Direct Angiography

Bypass Non-Invasive Testing Entirely (Class I Indications)

  • Survived sudden cardiac death or life-threatening ventricular arrhythmia 1
  • Symptoms and signs of heart failure requiring risk assessment 1
  • Unstable angina, particularly when intermediate or high-risk noncardiac surgery is scheduled 1
  • De novo symptoms highly suggestive of obstructive CAD occurring at low exercise levels after cardiologist assessment 1
  • Hemodynamic instability or recurrent life-threatening arrhythmias 1

Reasonable to Proceed to Angiography (Class IIa)

  • Depressed LV function (EF <50%) with moderate-risk criteria on non-invasive testing showing demonstrable ischemia 1
  • Inconclusive or inadequate non-invasive testing results 1
  • High-risk features on non-invasive testing despite preserved LV function 1
  • Evidence of high risk for adverse outcomes based on non-invasive test results 1

Pre-Procedural Preparation When Angiography Is Indicated

Access Site Planning

  • Radial artery access is the preferred access site (Class I recommendation) when invasive coronary angiography (ICA) is indicated 1

Functional Assessment Availability

  • Coronary pressure assessment must be available during ICA to evaluate functional severity of intermediate non-left main stenoses prior to revascularization (Class I) 1
  • FFR/iFR (significant ≤0.8 or ≤0.89 respectively) or QFR (significant ≤0.8) should be ready for selective use 1

Baseline Medical Therapy

High-risk patients should receive baseline treatment including:

  • Aspirin 1
  • Low-molecular-weight heparin 1
  • Clopidogrel (may need to be held 5 days before CABG if identified) 1
  • Beta-blockers if not contraindicated 1
  • Nitrates 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not perform angiography in patients who elect not to undergo revascularization or are not candidates due to comorbidities (Class III) 1
  • Do not skip non-invasive testing in stable patients with intermediate risk—this leads to unnecessary invasive procedures 3, 2
  • Do not rely solely on anatomic stenosis severity—functional assessment with FFR/iFR is essential for intermediate lesions 1
  • Avoid routine wire-based pressure assessment of all vessels—use selectively for intermediate stenoses (Class III recommendation against routine use) 1
  • Assess renal function before contrast exposure—particularly critical in elderly, diabetic, and CKD patients 1

Quality Considerations

The 2012 ACC/AHA guidelines note that 4% of coronary angiograms were of unacceptable quality and 48% had technical deficiencies in a New York State sample, with only 70% interobserver agreement 1. This underscores the importance of ensuring adequate non-invasive testing is performed first when clinically appropriate, as angiography has inherent limitations despite being the gold standard 1, 4.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Coronary computed tomography versus coronary angiography for preoperative coronary assessment before valve surgery.

The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology, 2021

Research

CT coronary angiography vs. invasive coronary angiography in CHD.

GMS health technology assessment, 2012

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.