What serum tests are needed for neurosyphilis diagnosis and monitoring?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 6, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Serum Testing for Neurosyphilis Diagnosis and Monitoring

Initial Serum Testing Required

For neurosyphilis diagnosis, you must obtain both a nontreponemal test (RPR or VDRL) and a treponemal test (FTA-ABS or TP-PA) on serum, as using only one type of test is insufficient for diagnosis. 1, 2

Nontreponemal Tests (Serum)

  • Order either RPR or VDRL quantitatively - these tests correlate with disease activity and must be reported with titers (e.g., 1:16,1:32) 1
  • RPR appears more sensitive than VDRL across all stages of syphilis, though both are acceptable 1
  • A serum RPR >1:32 indicates highest risk for neurosyphilis, particularly in HIV-infected patients 1
  • Critical pitfall: RPR and VDRL titers cannot be directly compared or used interchangeably - RPR titers are often slightly higher than VDRL 1, 2

Treponemal Tests (Serum)

  • Order FTA-ABS or TP-PA - these confirm treponemal infection but do not correlate with disease activity 1, 2
  • These tests remain reactive for life in most patients regardless of treatment, so they cannot be used to monitor treatment response 1
  • 15-25% of patients treated during primary stage may revert to nonreactive after 2-3 years 1

CSF Testing (Not Serum) - The Definitive Diagnostic Tests

Serum tests alone cannot diagnose neurosyphilis - CSF examination is mandatory when neurosyphilis is suspected. 1, 3

Required CSF Tests

  • CSF VDRL (not RPR on CSF) - this is the standard and most specific test 1, 3

    • When reactive in absence of blood contamination, it is diagnostic of neurosyphilis 1, 3
    • Sensitivity ranges 49-87%, specificity 74-100% 1, 3
    • A nonreactive CSF VDRL does NOT exclude neurosyphilis due to limited sensitivity 1, 3
  • CSF white blood cell count - typically elevated >5 cells/mm³ in active neurosyphilis 1, 3

    • This is the most sensitive measure of disease activity and treatment effectiveness 1, 3
    • In HIV patients, use >10 cells/µL as the threshold due to HIV-related baseline pleocytosis 4
  • CSF protein - usually normal or mildly elevated 4

    • Elevated protein alone without other abnormalities should not be used as sole diagnostic criterion 4

Optional CSF Tests

  • CSF FTA-ABS - some experts recommend this test 1, 3
    • Less specific than CSF VDRL (more false positives) but highly sensitive 1
    • A negative CSF FTA-ABS may help exclude neurosyphilis, though this is debated 1, 5

Monitoring Treatment Response

Use the same nontreponemal test (RPR or VDRL) performed by the same laboratory for all follow-up testing. 1, 2

  • A fourfold change in titer (two dilutions, e.g., 1:32 to 1:8) indicates clinically significant treatment response 1, 2
  • CSF WBC count is the most sensitive measure of treatment effectiveness for neurosyphilis 1, 3
  • Never use treponemal tests to monitor treatment - they remain positive regardless of cure 1, 2

Special Considerations for HIV-Infected Patients

  • Standard serologic tests remain accurate and reliable for most HIV-infected patients 1, 2
  • Some HIV patients may have atypical results (unusually high, low, or fluctuating titers) - consider additional testing like biopsy if results are discordant with clinical picture 1
  • HIV itself can cause mild CSF pleocytosis, complicating interpretation 4

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Never diagnose neurosyphilis based on serum tests alone - CSF examination is mandatory 3, 6
  • Never use RPR on CSF - only VDRL is validated for CSF testing 1
  • Blood contamination during lumbar puncture can cause false-positive CSF VDRL, especially with high serum titers 1, 4
  • Do not switch between RPR and VDRL when monitoring the same patient - this invalidates titer comparisons 1, 2
  • A nonreactive CSF VDRL does not rule out neurosyphilis when clinical suspicion is high 1, 3, 5

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Syphilis Diagnosis Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Diagnóstico y Seguimiento de Neurosífilis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

CSF Findings in Neurosyphilis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Neurosyphilis.

Continuum (Minneapolis, Minn.), 2021

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.