Up to what age has acalabrutinib (Acalabrutinib) been successfully used in clinical trials?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 6, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Age Range for Acalabrutinib Use in Clinical Trials

Acalabrutinib has been successfully used in clinical trials in patients up to 85 years of age, with no upper age limit established for its efficacy and safety. 1

Evidence from Clinical Trials

Relapsed/Refractory CLL Studies

The pivotal phase 1b/2 study in relapsed/refractory CLL enrolled patients with a median age of 66 years and an age range of 42-85 years, demonstrating that acalabrutinib maintained efficacy across this entire age spectrum. 1 This study showed an overall response rate of 94% with similar responses regardless of genomic features, and the estimated 45-month progression-free survival was 62%. 1

A more recent Chinese study in relapsed/refractory CLL included patients with a median age of 62 years, achieving an 85% overall response rate with 12-month and 18-month progression-free survival rates of 91.5% and 78.8%, respectively. 2

Treatment-Naive CLL Studies

In treatment-naive patients, the ACE-CL-001 trial enrolled patients with a median age of 64 years, achieving a 97% overall response rate with a 48-month duration of response rate of 97%. 3

The landmark ELEVATE-TN phase III study specifically enrolled patients **≥65 years or <65 years with coexisting conditions** (CIRS score >6 or creatinine clearance <70 mL/min), randomizing 535 patients to acalabrutinib-based regimens. 4 This study demonstrated 2-year progression-free survival rates of 93% for acalabrutinib plus obinutuzumab and 87% for acalabrutinib monotherapy, with 2-year overall survival rates of 95% in both acalabrutinib arms. 4

Oldest and Frailest Patient Population

The most compelling evidence comes from the CLL-Frail trial, which specifically enrolled patients ≥80 years old and/or frail patients, with a median age of 81 years. 5 This prospective trial demonstrated a 93.5% overall response rate, with estimated 12-month progression-free and overall survival rates of 93.3% and 95.7%, respectively. 5 Notably, 53.5% of patients reported improvement in their self-perceived frailty, and severe bleeding events were absent with only rare atrial fibrillation (two cases of grade 2 and 3). 5

Real-World Evidence

Real-world data from the French NAOS study included patients with a median age of 73 years in first-line and 77 years in relapsed/refractory settings, confirming effectiveness and safety consistent with clinical trials despite an older population with more cardiovascular comorbidities. 6 The 12-month real-world progression-free survival rate was 93.1% in first-line and 87% in relapsed/refractory patients. 6

Clinical Implications

  • No upper age limit has been established for acalabrutinib use based on clinical trial data, with successful treatment documented up to age 85 years in registration trials and a median age of 81 years in the dedicated frail/elderly population study. 1, 5

  • Acalabrutinib is particularly well-suited for older patients due to its favorable cardiovascular safety profile compared to ibrutinib, with lower rates of atrial fibrillation (4-7% overall, 1% grade ≥3) and hypertension (3-7% overall, 2-3% grade ≥3). 7, 4

  • The NCCN guidelines recommend acalabrutinib ± obinutuzumab for all patients with CLL without del(17p) or TP53 mutation, regardless of age, based on the ELEVATE-TN trial results. 4

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.