rTMS Protocol for Post-Stroke Cerebellar/Brainstem Ataxia
Apply low-frequency (1 Hz) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation directly over the affected cerebellar hemisphere for 15-20 minutes daily over 5-21 consecutive days, combined with intensive task-specific physical therapy immediately following each stimulation session. 1, 2
Specific Protocol Parameters
Stimulation Settings
- Frequency: 1 Hz low-frequency rTMS applied to the ipsilesional (affected) cerebellar hemisphere 2
- Alternative protocol: Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) to the injured cerebellar hemisphere has shown efficacy 1
- Duration: 15-20 minutes per session 1, 2
- Treatment course: 5-21 consecutive daily sessions 1, 3, 2
- Intensity: Standard motor threshold-based dosing 1, 2
Target Localization
- Primary target: The affected cerebellar hemisphere directly over the site of infarction 1, 2
- Bilateral approach: For extensive cerebellar damage, bilateral cerebellar stimulation may be considered 4
- Coil positioning: Use neuronavigation when available to ensure accurate targeting over cerebellar structures 5
Integration with Rehabilitation
Mandatory Concurrent Therapy
- Never apply rTMS as standalone treatment - it must be combined with intensive physical therapy 5, 6
- Timing: Deliver rTMS immediately before physical therapy sessions to prime neuroplasticity 6
- Therapy focus: 120 minutes of intensive task-specific training following each rTMS session 3
- Balance training: Emphasize postural control and gait training as recommended by the American Heart Association 7
Specific Rehabilitation Components
- Postural training to improve trunk control 7
- Task-oriented upper limb training for reaching and coordination deficits 7
- Balance training programs for fall prevention 7
- Progressive difficulty throughout the rehabilitation course 7
Patient Selection Criteria
Appropriate Candidates
- Confirmed cerebellar or brainstem infarction on MRI without IV contrast 7
- Ataxia that does not worsen with eye closure (distinguishing from sensory ataxia) 7
- Absence of rTMS contraindications (seizure history, metallic implants, pacemakers) 5
- Both acute and chronic post-stroke phases have shown benefit 1, 4, 2
Baseline Assessment Required
- Modified International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (MICARS) for ataxia severity 1
- International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) as alternative 3
- Berg Balance Scale (BBS) for balance function 2
- 10-meter walk test (10MWT) for gait assessment 2
Expected Outcomes and Monitoring
Primary Improvements
- Posture and gait subscale scores show most consistent improvement 1
- Balance function measured by BBS typically improves 36-46% 2
- Walking speed and step count improve by 8-17% 2
- Neurophysiological changes: Decreased cerebellar brain inhibition (CBI) and increased intracortical facilitation (ICF) 1
Reassessment Schedule
- Immediately after final session to measure acute effects 2
- One month post-treatment to assess sustained benefit 2
- Repeat MICARS/ICARS and functional measures at each timepoint 1, 3, 2
Safety Profile
Established Safety Data
- 100% compliance rate reported in controlled trials 2
- No adverse events reported in cerebellar ataxia protocols 1, 2
- Well-tolerated across all stroke rehabilitation applications 8
- Safe in both acute and chronic phases post-stroke 1, 4, 2
Critical Implementation Pitfalls
Common Errors to Avoid
- Do not apply rTMS without concurrent intensive rehabilitation - this violates the fundamental principle that rTMS modulates cortical excitability to enhance behavioral therapy effects 5, 6
- Do not use high-frequency protocols for cerebellar targets - evidence supports low-frequency (1 Hz) or iTBS only 1, 2
- Do not target the contralesional motor cortex in cerebellar stroke - stimulate the affected cerebellar hemisphere directly 1, 2
- Do not vary parameters mid-treatment without documented rationale 6
Contraindications
- Seizure history or epileptogenic lesions 5
- Metallic implants in head/neck region 5
- Cardiac pacemakers or implanted devices 5
Evidence Quality and Limitations
Current Evidence Base
- Pilot-level evidence from small randomized controlled trials (n=22-32) 2
- Case series and case reports for chronic cerebellar ataxia 1, 4
- No large multicenter trials specifically for cerebellar/brainstem stroke ataxia 5
- Heterogeneous protocols limit definitive recommendations 8
Guideline Status
- Not specifically addressed in major stroke rehabilitation guidelines for ataxia 5, 6
- Level A evidence exists for motor function in supratentorial stroke, but cerebellar applications remain investigational 6
- Preferentially conduct within clinical trial framework given limited evidence 5
Multidisciplinary Coordination
Team Requirements
- Physician leadership to screen eligibility, select parameters, and monitor safety 6
- Physical therapist to deliver intensive concurrent therapy 7, 6
- Occupational therapist for upper limb coordination training 3
- Speech-language pathologist if dysarthria or dysphagia present 7