Eltrombopag in Aplastic Anemia: Indication, Caution, and Dose
For patients with severe aplastic anemia refractory to immunosuppressive therapy, eltrombopag should be initiated at 150 mg orally once daily (or 75 mg daily for patients of East/Southeast Asian ancestry or those with hepatic impairment), with dose adjustments based on response and tolerability. 1, 2
Indication
Primary Indication:
- Eltrombopag is indicated for severe aplastic anemia patients who have had an insufficient response to prior immunosuppressive therapy 3
- The American Society of Hematology suggests adding eltrombopag to supportive care for patients with aplastic anemia refractory to initial immunosuppressive therapy 1
- Emerging evidence supports use in treatment-naïve elderly patients ineligible for antithymocyte globulin (ATG) therapy 4
Patient Selection:
- Patients with relapsed/refractory disease after ATG and cyclosporine 4, 5
- Patients ineligible for bone marrow transplantation 3
- Elderly patients unfit for standard immunosuppressive therapy may benefit as first-line treatment 4
Dosing
Standard Dosing:
- Initial dose: 150 mg orally once daily for most patients 2, 3
- Treatment duration: Minimum 12 weeks to assess response, with continuation for responders 5, 3
- Median daily dose in real-world use: 150 mg 4
Dose Modifications:
For East/Southeast Asian Ancestry:
- Reduce initial dose to 75 mg daily 2
For Hepatic Impairment (Child-Pugh Class A, B, or C):
- Reduce initial dose (specific reduction required per FDA labeling) 2
- Patients with baseline ALT or AST >5× ULN were ineligible in clinical trials 2
Dose Adjustments:
- Can be increased as needed up to maximum 150 mg daily based on response 5
- In robust responders, stable hematological counts may be maintained after discontinuation 3
Expected Response
Efficacy Rates:
- Overall hematologic response rate: 47% (95% CI 38-56%) for refractory patients treated with eltrombopag alone 6
- Response in at least one lineage: 64% in treatment-naïve patients, 74% in relapsed/refractory patients 4
- Trilineage improvement: 27% in treatment-naïve, 34% in relapsed/refractory patients 4
Timeline to Response:
- Transfusion independence rates: 7% at 1 month, 33% at 3 months, 46% at 6 months 4
- Responses develop more slowly in ATG treatment-naïve patients 4
- Primary endpoint assessment at 12 weeks 5
Magnitude of Response:
- Median hemoglobin increase: 3 g/dL (IQR 1.4-4.5) in responders 4
- Median platelet count increase: 42×10⁹/L (IQR 11-100) 4
- Median neutrophil count increase: 1,350 per cubic millimeter 5
Cautions and Monitoring
Critical Safety Concerns:
Clonal Evolution:
- Karyotype abnormalities occur in 10% overall (95% CI 7-14%) 6
- Higher rate of 17% (95% CI 10-24%) in refractory patients treated with eltrombopag alone 6
- Lower rate of 8% (95% CI 3-13%) when combined with immunosuppressive therapy without prior ATG 6
- Cytogenetic abnormalities observed in 19% of patients in some studies 3
- Dysplasia reported in 5% of patients 3
Hepatotoxicity:
- Increased liver transaminases are the only dose-limiting toxicity 3
- Liver function abnormalities reported in 13% of patients 7
- Monitor liver function tests regularly 2
Thrombotic Risk:
Bone Marrow Changes:
- Increased bone marrow reticulin reported 7
- Serial bone marrow biopsies showed normalization of trilineage hematopoiesis in responders without increased fibrosis 5
Rebound Thrombocytopenia:
- Worsening thrombocytopenia may occur upon discontinuation 7
Monitoring Requirements:
- Complete blood counts regularly to assess response 1
- Bone marrow evaluations to monitor for clonal evolution and dysplasia 6, 3
- Liver function tests for hepatotoxicity 2, 3
- Cytogenetic monitoring for chromosomal abnormalities 6
Important Clinical Pitfalls
Drug Interactions:
- Do not administer with polyvalent cations (calcium, aluminum, magnesium) as they chelate eltrombopag and limit absorption 2
- Separate administration from metal cation-containing preparations 2
Combination Therapy Concerns:
- In myelodysplastic syndrome, combination with azacitidine showed increased progression to AML (12% vs 6% with placebo) 7
- This concern is specific to MDS, not aplastic anemia, but warrants awareness 7
Special Populations:
- Pediatric patients must be able to swallow tablets whole 2
- Safety and effectiveness not established in pediatric patients with aplastic anemia 2
- No dosage adjustment needed in geriatric patients, though 18% of aplastic anemia patients in trials were ≥65 years 2
Pregnancy and Lactation: