What is the difference between bisoprolol and metoprolol in the treatment of heart failure and hypertension?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 7, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Bisoprolol vs Metoprolol in Heart Failure and Hypertension

Both bisoprolol and metoprolol succinate are equally effective evidence-based beta-blockers for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, each reducing all-cause mortality by approximately 34%, but bisoprolol offers the advantage of once-daily dosing and demonstrated efficacy without a run-in period, making it more representative of real-world clinical practice. 1, 2

Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF)

Mortality Benefits

Both agents demonstrate robust mortality reduction in landmark trials:

  • Bisoprolol (CIBIS-II): Reduced all-cause mortality from 17.3% to 11.8% (34% relative risk reduction), with sudden death reduced by 44% (from 6.3% to 3.6%). Number needed to treat: 23 patients for one year to prevent one death. 1, 3

  • Metoprolol succinate CR/XL (MERIT-HF): Reduced all-cause mortality by 34%, cardiovascular mortality by 38%, sudden death by 41%, and death from progressive heart failure by 49%. Number needed to treat: 27 patients for one year to prevent one death. 1, 4

Key Practical Differences

Dosing frequency: Bisoprolol requires once-daily administration (target 10 mg daily), while metoprolol succinate also allows once-daily dosing (target 200 mg daily). 2

Trial methodology: CIBIS-II did not include a run-in period, making bisoprolol's evidence more representative of actual clinical practice where patients may not be as carefully selected. 1 MERIT-HF included a 2-week placebo run-in period to assess clinical stability. 1

Target dose achievement: In MERIT-HF, 64% of patients reached the target dose of 200 mg daily, demonstrating good tolerability. 1

Dosing Protocols

Bisoprolol:

  • Start: 1.25 mg once daily
  • Titration: Double dose every 2-4 weeks as tolerated
  • Target: 10 mg once daily
  • 2, 3

Metoprolol succinate CR/XL:

  • Start: 12.5-25 mg once daily (use 12.5 mg for severe heart failure)
  • Titration: Double dose every 2 weeks as tolerated (12.5 → 25 → 50 → 100 → 200 mg)
  • Target: 200 mg once daily
  • 1, 2

Critical distinction: Only metoprolol succinate extended-release has proven mortality benefit; metoprolol tartrate (immediate-release) should never be used for heart failure. 2, 5, 6

Sex-Specific Considerations

Women may achieve optimal benefit at lower doses than men:

  • Women show higher drug exposure due to lower volume of distribution and reduced CYP2D6 metabolism 1
  • Women experience greater reductions in heart rate and blood pressure during exercise 1
  • Women may have lowest risk of death or hospitalization at half the guideline-recommended doses compared to men 1
  • Consider starting at lower end of dosing range and titrating more cautiously in women 1

Hypertension

For hypertension alone, beta-blockers are not recommended as first-line agents unless the patient has coexisting ischemic heart disease or heart failure. 2

When beta-blockers are indicated for hypertension:

Bisoprolol: 2.5-10 mg once daily 2, 7

Metoprolol tartrate: 100-200 mg daily in divided doses (note: this is the immediate-release formulation, which is acceptable for hypertension but not for heart failure) 2

Clinical Decision Algorithm

Choose bisoprolol when:

  • Patient adherence concerns favor once-daily dosing
  • Patient has not been stabilized on other medications (no run-in period needed)
  • Simpler titration schedule preferred (1.25 → 2.5 → 5 → 10 mg)
  • 1, 2, 3

Choose metoprolol succinate when:

  • Patient already stable on this agent
  • Higher target dose flexibility needed (up to 200 mg vs 10 mg)
  • Patient has post-myocardial infarction (specific indication for metoprolol succinate)
  • 2, 5, 6

Managing Adverse Effects During Titration

For worsening congestion:

  1. First: Double diuretic dose
  2. Second: Halve beta-blocker dose only if increasing diuretic fails 2

For marked fatigue or bradycardia:

  • Halve beta-blocker dose if heart rate <50 bpm with worsening symptoms 2

For symptomatic hypotension:

  1. First: Reduce or eliminate vasodilators (nitrates, calcium channel blockers)
  2. Second: Reduce diuretic dose if no congestion present
  3. Third: Temporarily reduce beta-blocker dose by 50%
  4. Last resort: Seek specialist advice before discontinuation 2

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

Never abruptly discontinue either agent, as this risks rebound myocardial ischemia, infarction, and arrhythmias. 2, 5

Do not use metoprolol tartrate for heart failure—only metoprolol succinate CR/XL has mortality benefit. 2, 5, 4

Avoid underdosing: Aim for at least 50% of target dose (bisoprolol 5 mg or metoprolol succinate 100 mg minimum) if full target cannot be achieved, as dose-response relationships exist for mortality benefit. 2, 5

Do not discontinue beta-blockers during acute decompensation unless severe hemodynamic instability or need for inotropic support exists; instead, adjust diuretics first. 1, 2

Recognize that cardioselectivity is dose-dependent: Poor CYP2D6 metabolizers (8% of Caucasians) have several-fold higher metoprolol concentrations, decreasing cardioselectivity and increasing risk of bronchospasm. 6

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Beta Blocker Therapy Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Metoprolol Succinate in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.