Cefadroxil vs Cefixime: Key Differences in Bacterial Coverage and Clinical Use
Cefadroxil and cefixime target opposite ends of the bacterial spectrum and are not interchangeable—cefadroxil is a first-generation cephalosporin effective against gram-positive organisms (streptococci and staphylococci) but has poor gram-negative and beta-lactamase coverage, while cefixime is a third-generation cephalosporin with potent activity against gram-negative bacteria (especially H. influenzae) but limited gram-positive coverage and no activity against staphylococci. 1
Spectrum of Activity: The Critical Distinction
Cefadroxil (First-Generation)
- Gram-positive coverage: Good activity against Streptococcus pyogenes, penicillin-susceptible S. pneumoniae, and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus 1, 2
- Gram-negative coverage: Poor activity against Haemophilus influenzae and most Enterobacteriaceae 1
- Beta-lactamase stability: Easily hydrolyzed by beta-lactamases, making it ineffective against beta-lactamase-producing organisms 1
- Anaerobic coverage: Minimal to none 1
Cefixime (Third-Generation)
- Gram-negative coverage: Potent activity against H. influenzae (including beta-lactamase-producing strains), Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and most Enterobacteriaceae 3, 1, 4
- Gram-positive coverage: Limited activity against penicillin-susceptible S. pneumoniae only; may occasionally fail even against susceptible strains 3, 1
- No staphylococcal activity: Completely inactive against S. aureus 3, 1, 4
- No DRSP coverage: No clinically significant activity against drug-resistant S. pneumoniae 3, 1
- No anaerobic coverage: Inactive against Bacteroides fragilis 1
Clinical Indications: When to Use Each
Choose Cefadroxil For:
- Skin and soft tissue infections caused by streptococci or methicillin-susceptible staphylococci (community-acquired, non-MRSA) 1
- Pharyngitis/tonsillitis due to S. pyogenes 1
- Simple urinary tract infections in areas with low E. coli resistance 1
- Key requirement: No concern for beta-lactamase-producing organisms and no gram-negative pathogen involvement expected 1
Choose Cefixime For:
- Acute bacterial rhinosinusitis when H. influenzae is suspected, though limited pneumococcal coverage is a concern 3, 1
- Uncomplicated urinary tract infections 5
- Otitis media (though clinical response to S. pneumoniae is approximately 10% lower than comparators) 3, 5
- Uncomplicated gonorrhea (cervical/urethral) 5, 4
- Key requirement: H. influenzae confirmed or suspected, but adequate gram-positive coverage is not needed 1
Critical Clinical Pitfalls to Avoid
Never Use Cefadroxil For:
- Infections involving H. influenzae (respiratory tract infections, otitis media) 1
- Beta-lactamase-producing organisms 1
Never Use Cefixime For:
- Empiric community-acquired pneumonia (inadequate S. pneumoniae coverage, especially DRSP) 3, 1
- Staphylococcal infections (skin/soft tissue, bacteremia) 3, 1
- Anaerobic infections (Bacteroides fragilis) 1
- Enterococcal infections 1
Pharmacokinetic Advantages
- Cefixime: 3-hour elimination half-life permits once- or twice-daily dosing, potentially improving compliance 4, 6
- Cefadroxil: Slower clearance than cephalexin, allowing less frequent dosing 7
Comparative Efficacy Data
- In otitis media trials, cefixime 8 mg/kg daily achieved 74-81% bacteriological eradication rates, comparable to cefaclor and amoxicillin 5, 4
- However, S. pneumoniae response to cefixime was approximately 10% lower than active controls (69-82% vs 82%), while H. influenzae response was 7% higher 5
- Cefadroxil achieved 94% satisfactory clinical outcomes in skin/skin structure infections, comparable to cephalexin (89%) and cefuroxime axetil (97%) 2
The Bottom Line Algorithm
Never substitute one for the other—they address opposite bacterial spectrums 1:
- If gram-positive coverage needed (strep throat, cellulitis, simple skin infections): Use cefadroxil 1
- If gram-negative coverage needed (H. influenzae sinusitis, UTI with known gram-negative pathogen): Use cefixime 1
- If both gram-positive AND gram-negative coverage needed: Neither drug is appropriate; consider amoxicillin-clavulanate or a respiratory fluoroquinolone 3