Erythropoietin in Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) such as erythropoietin are effective first-line therapy for symptomatic anemia in lower-risk MDS patients, achieving erythroid response rates of 40-60%, with the best outcomes in patients who have serum erythropoietin levels <500 mU/mL, require <2 units of RBC transfusions per month, and have low marrow blast percentages. 1
Patient Selection for ESA Therapy
Ideal Candidates
- Lower-risk MDS patients (IPSS low or intermediate-1; IPSS-R very low, low, or intermediate) with symptomatic anemia 1
- **Serum erythropoietin <500 mU/mL** - this is the critical threshold, as patients with levels >500 mU/mL have very low response rates and should not receive ESAs 1
- Low transfusion burden (<2 units RBC per month) - these patients have significantly higher response rates 1
- Low marrow blast percentage - associated with better response 1
- Patients with <15% ringed sideroblasts may respond to ESA monotherapy 1
Poor Candidates
- Serum erythropoietin >500 mU/mL 1
- High transfusion dependence (≥2 units per month) 1
- Higher-risk MDS (IPSS intermediate-2 or high) 1
Dosing Regimens
Erythropoietin Monotherapy
- 40,000-60,000 units subcutaneously 1-3 times per week 1
- Start at higher doses for more prompt response 1
- Darbepoetin alfa: 150-300 mcg subcutaneously per week 1
- Assess response after 6-8 weeks of treatment 1
Combination Therapy with G-CSF
- Add G-CSF if no response to ESA alone - this combination shows synergistic activity and increases response rates to approximately 38-39% 1
- G-CSF dosing: 1-2 mcg/kg subcutaneously daily or 1-3 times per week - use doses sufficient to normalize or double the neutrophil count 1
- Particularly effective in patients with ≥15% ringed sideroblasts where ESA monotherapy response rates are very low 1
Expected Outcomes
Response Rates
- ESA monotherapy: 40-60% combined major and minor responses in lower-risk patients 1
- ESA + G-CSF combination: 38-39% hematologic response rate 1
- Median duration of response: 23-24 months with maintenance therapy 1
Survival Benefits
- Treatment with EPO + G-CSF associated with improved survival (HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.44-0.83; P=0.002) compared to untreated controls 1
- Survival benefit most significant in IPSS low-risk patients requiring <2 units RBC transfusions per month 1
- No negative impact on AML progression - studies show ESA therapy does not increase risk of leukemic transformation 1
Treatment Algorithm
- Verify iron repletion before starting ESA therapy - iron deficiency must be corrected first 1
- Measure baseline serum erythropoietin level 1
- If serum EPO <500 mU/mL and low transfusion burden:
- Start ESA monotherapy (epoetin 40,000-60,000 units 1-3x/week or darbepoetin 150-300 mcg/week) 1
- Assess response at 6-8 weeks 1
- If no response to ESA alone:
- If response achieved:
- If no response after ESA + G-CSF:
Safety Considerations
Target Hemoglobin
- Goal hemoglobin ≤12 g/dL - do not target levels >12 g/dL due to increased mortality, thromboembolism, and possible tumor promotion observed in other patient populations 1
Monitoring
- Weekly CBC during initial treatment to assess response 1
- Monitor for thromboembolic events - increased risk when targeting higher hemoglobin levels 1
- Verify iron stores remain adequate during treatment 1
Common Pitfalls
- Using ESAs in patients with serum EPO >500 mU/mL - these patients have negligible response rates and therapy is not cost-effective 1
- Inadequate dosing - MDS requires much higher doses than renal anemia (40,000-60,000 units vs standard renal dosing) 1
- Not checking iron status - iron deficiency will prevent ESA response 1
- Continuing therapy beyond 8 weeks without response - if no response by 6-8 weeks, treatment should be discontinued 1
- Targeting hemoglobin >12 g/dL - associated with increased adverse events 1
- Not adding G-CSF in patients with ringed sideroblasts - this subgroup has very low response to ESA alone but improved response with combination therapy 1