Blood Testing to Differentiate Type 1 from Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Test for multiple islet autoantibodies (GAD, IA-2, insulin, and ZnT8) as the primary laboratory method to distinguish between type 1 and type 2 diabetes, supplemented by C-peptide measurement when autoantibody results are inconclusive. 1
Primary Diagnostic Approach: Autoantibody Testing
The American Diabetes Association recommends standardized islet autoantibody testing as the most valuable laboratory test for differentiating between T1DM and T2DM, particularly when clinical presentation is ambiguous. 2, 1 The specific autoantibodies to test include:
- Glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) antibodies 2
- Islet antigen 2 (IA-2/IA-2β) antibodies 2
- Insulin autoantibodies (IAA) 2
- Zinc transporter 8 (ZnT8) antibodies 2, 1
Multiple positive autoantibodies strongly indicate T1DM or latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA), while their absence suggests T2DM. 2, 1 Testing for multiple autoantibodies provides the strongest differentiation between T1DM and T2DM. 1
Secondary Test: C-Peptide Measurement
C-peptide measurement assesses endogenous insulin production capacity, with lower levels typically indicating T1DM and higher levels suggesting T2DM. 2, 1 For accurate results, measure fasting C-peptide when simultaneous fasting plasma glucose is ≤220 mg/dL (12.5 mmol/L). 1
C-peptide testing is particularly useful when:
- Autoantibody results are negative but clinical suspicion for T1DM remains 1
- Determining residual beta-cell function in established diabetes 2
- Evaluating continued need for insulin therapy 2
Clinical Algorithm for Testing
When clinical presentation is unclear, proceed with antibody testing first; if multiple autoantibodies are positive, this strongly suggests T1DM or LADA. 1 The American Diabetes Association suggests considering autoantibody testing in adults with phenotypic risk factors that overlap with T1DM, such as:
- Younger age at diagnosis 2, 1
- Unintentional weight loss 2, 1
- Ketoacidosis at presentation 2, 1
- Short time to insulin treatment 2
- Rapid progression to insulin dependence 1
For obese children and adolescents presenting with ketosis or ketoacidosis, autoantibody testing should be considered despite the atypical presentation. 1
Complementary Clinical Assessment: The AABBCC Approach
The American Diabetes Association recommends using the AABBCC clinical approach to complement laboratory testing: 2, 1
- Age: For individuals <35 years old, consider type 1 diabetes 2
- Autoimmunity: Personal or family history of autoimmune disease or polyglandular autoimmune syndromes 2
- Body habitus: BMI <25 kg/m² suggests T1DM 2
- Background: Family history of type 1 diabetes 2
- Control: Inability to achieve glycemic goals on noninsulin therapies 2
- Comorbidities: Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors for cancer can cause acute autoimmune type 1 diabetes 2
Important Caveats and Pitfalls
Autoantibody testing should only be performed in accredited laboratories with established quality control programs to ensure accuracy. 1 Autoantibodies may not be detectable in all T1DM patients and tend to decrease with age. 2, 1
A diagnosis of T1DM does not preclude having features classically associated with T2DM, such as insulin resistance, obesity, and other metabolic abnormalities. 2, 1 Some patients may have features of both T1DM and T2DM, requiring treatment approaches for both conditions. 1
In adults with T2DM phenotype but positive autoantibodies (LADA), insulin dependency typically develops over several years rather than immediately. 2, 1
Insulin or proinsulin testing is not recommended for routine clinical care and is primarily useful for research purposes only. 1 C-peptide measurement alone may not be clinically necessary in all cases, as response to therapy can provide useful diagnostic information. 1
Tests NOT Required for Differentiation
Standard diabetes diagnostic tests (HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose, oral glucose tolerance test) diagnose the presence of diabetes but do not differentiate between type 1 and type 2. 2 These tests establish hyperglycemia but provide no information about the underlying etiology or beta-cell function. 2