Is an epidural catheter safely assumed to be not intrathecal or vascular after a negative SHA test and test doses of epinephrine and lidocaine, with no significant tachycardia and hypotension?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 10, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Epidural Catheter Safety After Small Blood on Insertion

Your epidural catheter is highly likely to be correctly positioned in the epidural space and not intrathecal or intravascular, given the negative aspiration test, multiple negative test doses with epinephrine and lidocaine showing no tachycardia or hypotension, and the absence of continuous blood return. 1, 2

Understanding the Clinical Picture

The small amount of blood seen during insertion without continuous flow is a common occurrence that typically represents minor vessel trauma during needle or catheter passage, not sustained intravascular placement. 3

Key Reassuring Findings in Your Case:

  • Negative aspiration (SHA test): While negative aspiration doesn't completely rule out misplacement (intrathecal injection after negative aspiration occurs in only 1:1,750 to 1:126,000 cases), it is highly reassuring. 1, 2

  • Multiple negative test doses with epinephrine and lidocaine: You performed the test dose 2-3 times without observing:

    • Tachycardia (increase in heart rate >10 bpm)
    • Hypertension (increase in systolic BP >15 mmHg)
    • Hypotension or autonomic changes

    This makes intravascular placement extremely unlikely. 2, 3, 4

  • No continuous blood return: The absence of ongoing blood flow strongly suggests the catheter is not in a vessel. 5, 3

Evidence-Based Interpretation

For Intravascular Placement:

Aspiration alone detects 47 of 48 (97.9%) intravascular multiorifice catheters. 3 When combined with your negative epinephrine test dose (which has 80-100% sensitivity and 83-100% positive predictive value for detecting intravascular placement), the probability of an undetected intravascular catheter is exceptionally low. 4

The epinephrine test dose specifically looks for:

  • Heart rate increase >10 bpm
  • Systolic BP increase >15 mmHg

Your patient showed neither, making intravascular placement highly improbable. 2, 4

For Intrathecal Placement:

The most reliable indicator of intrathecal placement is motor block, which requires 5 minutes for accurate assessment and has 95-100% specificity. 2 The 2024 Obstetric Anaesthetists' Association guidelines recommend a test dose of 10 mg bupivacaine (or equivalent lidocaine dose) to detect intrathecal placement while minimizing risk of total spinal. 1, 2

If your catheter were intrathecal, you would expect to see within 3-5 minutes:

  • Motor block (inability to perform straight leg raise) - most reliable sign 2, 6
  • Rapid bilateral sensory block extending to higher dermatomes than expected (sensitivity 80-90%) 2
  • Autonomic effects including hypotension requiring vasopressors (specificity 90-95%) 2
  • Subjective symptoms of leg warmth or heaviness (though less reliable with only 59-74% specificity) 1, 2

Your patient demonstrated none of these findings after multiple test doses. 1, 2

Critical Safety Considerations

What You Should Monitor Going Forward:

  • Assess motor function before each subsequent dose by checking straight leg raise ability 6
  • Check sensory level at least every 5 minutes after dosing until no further extension is observed 7, 6
  • Monitor for signs of high/total spinal: increasing agitation, significant hypotension, bradycardia, upper limb weakness, dyspnea, or difficulty speaking 2, 7
  • Have vasopressors immediately available (phenylephrine or ephedrine) 2, 6

Common Pitfalls to Avoid:

Never assume negative aspiration alone completely rules out misplacement - though rare, direct intrathecal injection after negative aspiration can occur. 1, 2 However, your multiple negative test doses provide additional layers of safety.

Do not rely solely on subjective symptoms (warmth, heaviness) as these have poor specificity (59-74%) for detecting intrathecal placement. 1, 2

Do not proceed with full therapeutic dosing if any uncertainty exists - start with incremental dosing and assess response. 2

Practical Dosing Strategy for This Patient

Given your reassuring findings, you can proceed with standard epidural dosing, but use incremental administration:

  • For surgical anesthesia: Give 3-5 mL increments of your intended local anesthetic solution, waiting 3-5 minutes between doses to assess for unexpected spread or motor block. 1, 6

  • Assess motor and sensory function after each increment before proceeding. 2, 6

  • Total dose should not exceed what you would normally use for epidural anesthesia at this level. 1

Bottom Line

The combination of negative aspiration, multiple negative test doses showing no hemodynamic changes, and absence of continuous blood return provides strong evidence that your catheter is correctly positioned in the epidural space. 1, 2, 3 While no test is 100% sensitive, you have performed multiple complementary assessments that collectively make misplacement extremely unlikely. Proceed with incremental dosing and vigilant monitoring as outlined above. 2, 6

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Management of Accidental Intrathecal or Intravascular Catheter Placement During Epidural Anesthesia

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

The epidural test dose: a review.

Anesthesia and analgesia, 2006

Guideline

Bupivacaine Dosing Guidelines for Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Causes of Ineffective Epidural Anesthesia

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.