What is the estimated Body Surface Area (BSA) for a 10-year-old girl weighing 57.4 kilograms (kg)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 10, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Body Surface Area Calculation for a 10-Year-Old Girl Weighing 57.4 kg

For a 10-year-old girl weighing 57.4 kg, the estimated Body Surface Area (BSA) is approximately 1.57-1.62 m² using validated pediatric formulas, though height measurement is essential for accurate calculation.

Critical Missing Information

  • Height is required for accurate BSA calculation 1, 2, 3
  • All validated BSA formulas incorporate both weight and height as essential variables 2, 3, 4
  • Without height, only rough estimates can be provided based on typical growth patterns 1

Estimated BSA Range (Assuming Typical Height)

For a 10-year-old girl at 57.4 kg, assuming she falls within typical height ranges:

  • If height is approximately 140 cm (50th percentile): BSA ≈ 1.57 m² 3
  • If height is approximately 145 cm (75th percentile): BSA ≈ 1.62 m² 3
  • If height is approximately 135 cm (25th percentile): BSA ≈ 1.52 m² 3

Important Clinical Context

This child's weight of 57.4 kg is substantially above typical ranges for age, raising concerns about obesity 5:

  • The CDC recommends using CDC growth charts for children over 24 months to assess BMI percentiles 1, 5
  • A 10-year-old girl with this weight likely has a BMI ≥95th percentile, meeting criteria for obesity classification 5
  • The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends immediate assessment for obesity-related complications in children with BMI above the 95th percentile 5

Recommended BSA Formulas for Pediatric Use

Mosteller Formula (simplest and most practical) 4, 6:

  • BSA (m²) = √[(height in cm × weight in kg) / 3600]
  • Widely validated across pediatric and adult populations 4
  • Excellent correlation with other established formulas (r > 0.97) 4

Haycock Formula (pediatric-specific validation) 3, 4:

  • BSA (m²) = weight (kg)^0.5378 × height (cm)^0.3964 × 0.024265
  • Derived from geometric measurements in children and validated from premature infants to adults 3
  • Provides excellent fit for BSA values from <0.2 m² to >2.0 m² (r = 0.998) 3

Gehan-George Formula (medical standard) 6:

  • ln(BSA) = -3.751 + 0.422 × ln(height in cm) + 0.515 × ln(weight in kg)
  • Based on 401 surface area measurements with least squares coefficient estimation 6
  • Recommended as the medical standard due to robust sample size and methodology 6

Clinical Application Considerations

For medication dosing in this patient 1:

  • BSA-based dosing is critical for chemotherapeutic agents and certain cardiac medications 4
  • The DuBois-DuBois formula (commonly used historically) underestimates BSA in obese patients by 3-5% 4
  • Mosteller or Gehan-George formulas provide more accurate estimates in overweight/obese children 4, 6

Growth assessment priorities 5, 7:

  • Plot weight and height on CDC growth charts to determine BMI percentile 1, 5
  • Screen for obesity-related complications including metabolic abnormalities and cardiovascular risk factors 5
  • Assess dietary patterns, physical activity levels, sleep habits, and family history 5
  • Serial measurements every 2-4 months initially to track BMI trajectory 5

Practical Calculation Steps

  1. Obtain accurate height measurement (standing, without shoes) 1
  2. Apply Mosteller formula for quick bedside calculation: BSA = √[(height × 57.4) / 3600] 4
  3. Verify with Gehan-George formula if precise dosing required 6
  4. Plot on CDC growth charts to assess obesity status 5, 7

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Never use weight-only estimates for BSA calculation in clinical decision-making 2, 3
  • Avoid DuBois-DuBois formula in obese patients due to systematic underestimation 4
  • Do not assume normal growth patterns given this child's elevated weight for age 5
  • Recognize that BSA formulas may overestimate when using traditional equations in obese patients compared to 3D scanning methods 4

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Human body surface area: a theoretical approach.

European journal of applied physiology, 2004

Guideline

Childhood Obesity Assessment and Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Estimating the surface area of the human body.

Statistics in medicine, 1996

Guideline

Growth Assessment and Monitoring for Children with Low Weight and Height Percentiles

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.