What are the typical exam findings for pyloric stenosis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 10, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Pyloric Stenosis Exam Findings

The classic exam finding is a palpable olive-shaped mass in the right upper quadrant, though this is absent in 50% or more of cases, making its absence insufficient to rule out the diagnosis. 1, 2

Physical Examination Findings

Palpable Pyloric Mass ("Olive")

  • An olive-shaped, firm muscular tumor in the right upper quadrant is pathognomonic when present 3
  • However, clinicians fail to detect this mass in 11-51% of confirmed cases 4
  • Recent data shows the palpable olive is absent in approximately 50% of patients, with this percentage increasing over time as imaging is utilized earlier 2, 5
  • Physical examination should be performed by an experienced examiner, ideally after gastric decompression, as a distended stomach can obscure the pyloric mass 1

Visible Gastric Peristalsis

  • Vigorous gastric peristaltic waves may be visible after feeding, moving from left to right across the upper abdomen 2, 3
  • This finding reflects gastric outlet obstruction and increased gastric contractions attempting to overcome the stenosis 3

Clinical Presentation Features

  • Projectile vomiting is the hallmark symptom but is absent in one-third of patients 2
  • Vomiting is typically non-bilious 5
  • Mean age at diagnosis is approximately 40 days (range 37-43 days) 2, 5
  • Male predominance of approximately 81-86% 2, 5
  • Dehydration may be present, though less common with earlier diagnosis 5

Laboratory Findings

Metabolic Derangements (Less Common with Early Diagnosis)

  • Classic hypochloremic, hypokalemic metabolic alkalosis is present in only a minority of cases when diagnosed early 2
  • Bicarbonate >28 mEq/L found in only 20% of patients 2
  • pH >7.45 present in only 25% of patients 2
  • Hypochloremia noted in approximately one-third of cases 2
  • Elevated serum urea and creatinine may indicate dehydration 5

Critical Clinical Pitfall

The absence of a palpable mass does not exclude pyloric stenosis, and ultrasound should be performed when clinical suspicion remains high 1. The declining frequency of palpable masses (now absent in ~50% of cases) is likely due to declining clinical examination skills and earlier utilization of imaging studies rather than an actual change in disease presentation 2, 5. This earlier diagnosis prevents progression to the severe metabolic derangements historically considered "classic" for this condition 5.

Diagnostic Approach When Exam is Non-Diagnostic

  • Ultrasound is the imaging modality of choice and should be the initial imaging procedure 6, 7, 3
  • Ultrasound has 100% sensitivity and specificity when performed properly 7
  • Upper GI series is reserved for cases where ultrasound findings are equivocal or negative despite strong clinical suspicion 6
  • Definitive diagnosis should be performed by a pediatric radiologist 6

References

Guideline

Diagnosis of Pyloric Stenosis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Clinical presentation of pyloric stenosis: the change is in our hands.

The Israel Medical Association journal : IMAJ, 2004

Research

Recent changes in the features of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.

Pediatrics international : official journal of the Japan Pediatric Society, 2016

Guideline

Diagnostic Approach to Pyloric Stenosis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.