Does two years of negative circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) tests affect the risk of recurrence in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 11, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Impact of Two Years of Negative ctDNA Testing on Recurrence Risk in HR+ Breast Cancer

Two years of consistently negative ctDNA testing substantially reduces the expected recurrence rate and provides strong reassurance of favorable long-term outcomes in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. 1, 2

Prognostic Significance of Serial Negative ctDNA

Patients with serially negative ctDNA tests during long-term follow-up demonstrate superior clinical outcomes compared to those with detectable ctDNA. 2 In a prospective study of 156 breast cancer patients monitored for up to 12 years, serial ctDNA negativity was strongly associated with both improved relapse-free survival (P < 0.0001) and overall survival (P < 0.0001). 2

Specific Evidence for HR+ Disease

  • In high-risk HR+ breast cancer patients followed beyond 5 years from diagnosis, only 10% had detectable ctDNA at any timepoint, and all six patients (7.2%) who developed distant metastatic recurrence were ctDNA-positive before clinical detection. 1

  • Critically, patients who remained ctDNA-negative throughout surveillance had no distant recurrences, even among those with high-risk stage II-III disease. 1

  • The median lead time for ctDNA detection before clinical recurrence was 12.4 months (range up to 38 months), demonstrating that negative tests during this window indicate absence of detectable minimal residual disease. 1, 2

Quantifying the Reduced Risk

Two years of negative ctDNA effectively reclassifies patients into a lower risk category regardless of initial clinical risk factors. 2

  • Among 122 non-relapsed patients in one cohort, only 5 (4.1%) had occasional positive ctDNA tests, and all had HR+ disease; the remaining 117 patients with consistently negative tests remained disease-free during median follow-up of 58 months. 2

  • The negative predictive value of serial ctDNA testing is exceptionally high: in triple-negative breast cancer (which has more aggressive biology), all 16 non-relapsed patients remained ctDNA-negative during follow-up, while all 7 who relapsed had positive ctDNA within median 8 months before clinical detection. 2

  • For HR+ disease specifically, the pattern is even more favorable, as late recurrences are more common but ctDNA remains highly sensitive for detecting them early. 1

Clinical Interpretation for Your Patient

Your patient's two years of negative ctDNA testing indicates:

  • Absence of detectable minimal residual disease throughout this surveillance period, which is the most critical window for early metastatic recurrence detection. 1, 2

  • Substantially lower risk of near-term recurrence compared to baseline clinical risk estimates, as ctDNA has been shown to detect recurrence a median of 10.5-12.4 months before clinical manifestation. 1, 2

  • Excellent prognosis comparable to patients who achieved pathologic complete response in neoadjuvant settings, even if initial tumor characteristics suggested higher risk. 3

Important Caveats for HR+ Disease

One nuance specific to HR+ breast cancer: Approximately 4% of non-relapsed HR+ patients may have occasional positive ctDNA tests that do not lead to clinical recurrence. 2 However, sustained negativity over two years eliminates this concern and provides strong evidence of durable remission.

  • The risk of late recurrence (beyond 5-10 years) remains a consideration in HR+ disease due to its biology, but negative ctDNA during years 5-10 from diagnosis is particularly reassuring. 4, 1

  • Standard adjuvant endocrine therapy duration recommendations (5-10 years depending on risk factors) remain applicable, but the negative ctDNA data supports that current therapy is effectively controlling any residual disease. 4

In practical terms, two years of negative ctDNA testing reduces your patient's recurrence risk to levels approaching that of patients who never had detectable disease, providing strong evidence for continued surveillance without escalation of therapy. 1, 2

References

Research

Circulating Tumor DNA and Late Recurrence in High-Risk Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Breast Cancer.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2022

Research

Circulating tumor DNA in neoadjuvant-treated breast cancer reflects response and survival.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2021

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Related Questions

Can the Signatera test detect invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) breast cancer that has metastasized to areas such as a supraclavicular lymph node, and what is the accuracy of a negative test result in a patient with a history of breast cancer?
What is CT (Computed Tomography) DNA by Signatera?
What is the false positive rate of the Signatera (circulating tumor DNA) test?
What is the accuracy of a negative computed tomography (CT) deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) test for lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) over a 2-year period?
When is the Signatera (circulating tumor DNA) test used in patients with a history of solid tumors, such as colorectal, breast, or lung cancer?
What if a urinary tract infection is suspected but there is no leukocyte esterase present?
What is the appropriate empirical antibiotic for a 4-month-old baby with a urinary tract infection (UTI), presenting with fever, positive nitrite, and positive leukocytes on urinalysis, who is stable, not dehydrated, and feeding well?
What is the recommended tinidazole (antiprotozoal medication) dose per kilogram in children (pediatric patients)?
What is the treatment plan for a 17-year-old female with recurring epistaxis due to Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia (HHT)?
What medication adjustment or addition is recommended for a patient with anxiety, depression, bipolar 2 disorder, and ADHD, currently on Pristiq (desvenlafaxine), Vyvanse (lisdexamfetamine), and Bupropion, with persistent racing thoughts and anxiety?
Has the patient tried non-stimulant medications, such as atomoxetine, for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) which did not help?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.