Assessment of Alignment Parameters for High Tibial Osteotomy
Based on your measurements (LDFA 87° right/89° left, MPTA 83° right/84° left), isolated high tibial osteotomy is NOT the appropriate surgical approach, and a double-level osteotomy (both femoral and tibial) would be required to achieve proper correction without creating excessive joint line obliquity or tibial overcorrection.
Deformity Analysis
Your angular measurements indicate a combined tibial and femoral deformity requiring careful surgical planning:
Tibial Component
- Right MPTA: 83° (normal 87-90°) 1, 2
- Left MPTA: 84° (normal 87-90°) 1, 2
- Both sides demonstrate significant tibial varus deformity (>3° deviation from normal) 1
Femoral Component
- Right LDFA: 87° (normal 85-90°) 1, 3
- Left LDFA: 89° (normal 85-90°) 1, 3
- The right side shows borderline femoral varus contribution 1
Surgical Recommendation
A double-level osteotomy is indicated for proper correction based on the following evidence:
- When both MPTA <85° and LDFA considerations exist, isolated HTO risks creating excessive tibial valgus (MPTA >95°) and joint line obliquity >5° 1, 3
- In a cohort analysis of 303 varus knees, 63% required double-level osteotomy when anatomic correction limits were respected (MPTA ≤90°, LDFA ≥85°) 1
- Even accepting overcorrection (MPTA ≤95°), 33% still required double-level osteotomy to avoid excessive joint line obliquity 1
- Your bilateral MPTA values of 83-84° place you in the category requiring double tibial osteotomy at minimum, potentially with femoral correction depending on overall mechanical axis 4
Critical Thresholds to Avoid Complications
Post-Operative MPTA Target
- Target post-operative MPTA: 95° to prevent recurrent varus deformity 2
- MPTA ≥95° resulted in 92.3% stable outcomes versus 47.4% with MPTA <95° 2
- However, MPTA should not exceed 95° to avoid excessive tibial valgus and joint line obliquity 1, 3
Joint Line Obliquity
- Maximum acceptable joint line obliquity: <5° 3
- Excessive obliquity complicates future total knee arthroplasty and affects functional outcomes 3
Bone Grafting Considerations
Autogenous bone graft is recommended for opening wedge osteotomies:
- Complete excision of deformity sites with sufficient autogenous bone graft represents consensus surgical management 5
- Opening wedge HTO without bone graft showed acceptable union rates, but your case requires double-level correction where graft stability becomes more critical 2
- Iliac crest bone graft (both cortical and cancellous) provides optimal structural support for double-level corrections 5
Surgical Approach Algorithm
For your specific measurements:
- Bilateral double tibial osteotomy (proximal and distal tibial levels) to correct the bow-leg deformity throughout the tibia 4
- Evaluate for concomitant distal femoral osteotomy if mechanical axis correction remains inadequate after tibial correction 1, 4
- Target correction: Mechanical axis to 2° valgus, MPTA to 95°, maintaining joint line obliquity <5° 1, 2, 3
- Fixation: External fixation combined with intramedullary fixation for stability 5
Common Pitfall to Avoid
The most critical error would be performing isolated HTO, which would require overcorrecting the MPTA to 95-100° to achieve proper mechanical axis alignment, creating:
- Excessive joint line obliquity (>5°) 3
- Increased risk of lateral compartment overload 1
- Complications for future total knee arthroplasty 3
The ESSKA consensus data demonstrates that only 25.3% of isolated HTOs met "ideal" indication criteria, with many creating unfavorable joint line geometry despite acceptable functional outcomes in the short term 3.