What is the recommended suture technique for wound closure in gynecology surgery, specifically the figure of eight (8) suture?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 11, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Figure-of-Eight Suture in Gynecologic Surgery

Primary Recommendation

The figure-of-eight suture technique is specifically indicated for hemostasis in gynecologic surgery, particularly for controlling bleeding from vascular pedicles or bleeding points, but is not recommended as a primary wound closure technique. The evidence-based guidelines prioritize continuous non-locking suturing techniques for fascial and skin closure in gynecologic procedures 1.

When to Use Figure-of-Eight Sutures

Hemostatic Applications

  • Use figure-of-eight sutures for controlling active bleeding from vascular pedicles during hysterectomy or other gynecologic procedures where direct vessel ligation is needed 2
  • Apply this technique when encountering bleeding from the uterine vessels, infundibulopelvic ligament, or other vascular structures requiring secure hemostasis 2
  • The figure-of-eight configuration provides compression and secure vessel occlusion that simple interrupted sutures may not achieve 2

Recommended Closure Techniques for Gynecologic Surgery

Fascial Closure

For abdominal wall closure after laparotomy, use continuous non-locking "small bite" technique with slowly absorbable monofilament suture 1, 3:

  • Place sutures approximately 5mm from wound edges 1, 3
  • Space stitches 5mm apart 1, 3
  • Maintain a suture-to-wound length ratio of 4:1 or higher to reduce incisional hernia risk 1, 3
  • Use monofilament materials (poliglecaprone/Monocryl or polyglyconate/Maxon) as they cause less bacterial seeding 1, 3, 2

Rationale for Small Bite Technique

The small bite approach significantly reduces incisional hernias and wound complications compared to large bites (>10mm) because 1:

  • Aponeurosis has limited regeneration capacity and cannot bridge large defects 1
  • Large bites include fat and muscle, which compress under intra-abdominal pressure causing tissue devitalization 1
  • Wound edge separation >10-12mm during early postoperative period strongly associates with incisional hernia development 1

Vaginal and Perineal Repair

Use continuous non-locking technique with monofilament absorbable sutures for all layers 1, 4:

  • Anchor suture above the apex of vaginal epithelium 1, 4
  • Close vaginal epithelium and muscularis continuously down to hymenal ring 1, 4
  • Reapproximate bulbocavernosus muscles with crown stitch at perineal body 1, 4
  • Close perineal skin with continuous non-locking subcuticular stitch 1, 4

Avoid locking sutures as they cause excessive tension leading to tissue edema and necrosis 1, 4.

Skin Closure

For midline vertical incisions in obese patients (BMI ≥30), subcuticular 4-0 monofilament suture is equivalent to staples for wound complications but provides superior cosmetic outcomes 5:

  • No difference in wound complication rates (32-33%) between techniques 5
  • Subcuticular suture results in better cosmetic scores, less scar darkness, and fewer skin marks 5
  • BMI, postoperative glucose levels, and smoking are the actual predictors of wound complications, not closure method 5

Suture Material Selection

Optimal Choices

Prioritize slowly absorbable monofilament sutures for all gynecologic closures 1, 3, 2:

  • Monofilament materials reduce bacterial seeding and infection risk compared to multifilament 1, 3
  • Slowly absorbable sutures (vs rapidly absorbable) decrease incisional hernia rates with high-quality evidence 1
  • Consider triclosan-coated sutures (Vicryl Plus) when available, as they reduce surgical site infections (OR 0.62,95% CI 0.44-0.88) 4

Avoid Catgut

Do not use catgut sutures as they are associated with more pain and higher resuturing rates compared to synthetic alternatives 3.

Special Considerations

Subcutaneous Closure in High-Risk Patients

In obese patients undergoing gynecologic malignancy surgery, prophylactic subcutaneous drainage plus subcuticular sutures significantly reduces wound separation compared to staples 6:

  • Wound separation rate: 2.5% with drainage/subcuticular sutures vs 8.5% with staples (OR 7.34,95% CI 1.59-33.91) 6
  • This technique is particularly protective in obese patients where zero wound separations occurred 6

Peritoneal Closure

Do not close the peritoneum during hysterectomy 2:

  • Peritoneal closure provides no outcome benefit 2
  • Non-closure reduces operative time 2
  • No evidence supports peritoneal closure for preventing adhesions 2

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Never use figure-of-eight sutures for primary fascial or skin closure—reserve this technique exclusively for hemostasis 2
  • Avoid interrupted sutures for fascial closure—continuous technique distributes tension more evenly and reduces complications 1
  • Do not use large bite technique (>10mm)—this increases incisional hernia risk through tissue devitalization 1
  • Never place overly tight sutures—this strangulates tissue and impairs healing 4, 2
  • Avoid transcutaneous interrupted sutures on perineal skin—they damage superficial nerve endings causing pain 1, 4

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Suture Types for Hysterectomy

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Suture Material Recommendations

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Vaginal Suture Repair Post Normal Delivery

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Identification of new risk factors for wound separation in gynecologic malignancy surgery.

The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research, 2015

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.