Figure-of-Eight Suture in Gynecologic Surgery
Primary Recommendation
The figure-of-eight suture technique is specifically indicated for hemostasis in gynecologic surgery, particularly for controlling bleeding from vascular pedicles or bleeding points, but is not recommended as a primary wound closure technique. The evidence-based guidelines prioritize continuous non-locking suturing techniques for fascial and skin closure in gynecologic procedures 1.
When to Use Figure-of-Eight Sutures
Hemostatic Applications
- Use figure-of-eight sutures for controlling active bleeding from vascular pedicles during hysterectomy or other gynecologic procedures where direct vessel ligation is needed 2
- Apply this technique when encountering bleeding from the uterine vessels, infundibulopelvic ligament, or other vascular structures requiring secure hemostasis 2
- The figure-of-eight configuration provides compression and secure vessel occlusion that simple interrupted sutures may not achieve 2
Recommended Closure Techniques for Gynecologic Surgery
Fascial Closure
For abdominal wall closure after laparotomy, use continuous non-locking "small bite" technique with slowly absorbable monofilament suture 1, 3:
- Place sutures approximately 5mm from wound edges 1, 3
- Space stitches 5mm apart 1, 3
- Maintain a suture-to-wound length ratio of 4:1 or higher to reduce incisional hernia risk 1, 3
- Use monofilament materials (poliglecaprone/Monocryl or polyglyconate/Maxon) as they cause less bacterial seeding 1, 3, 2
Rationale for Small Bite Technique
The small bite approach significantly reduces incisional hernias and wound complications compared to large bites (>10mm) because 1:
- Aponeurosis has limited regeneration capacity and cannot bridge large defects 1
- Large bites include fat and muscle, which compress under intra-abdominal pressure causing tissue devitalization 1
- Wound edge separation >10-12mm during early postoperative period strongly associates with incisional hernia development 1
Vaginal and Perineal Repair
Use continuous non-locking technique with monofilament absorbable sutures for all layers 1, 4:
- Anchor suture above the apex of vaginal epithelium 1, 4
- Close vaginal epithelium and muscularis continuously down to hymenal ring 1, 4
- Reapproximate bulbocavernosus muscles with crown stitch at perineal body 1, 4
- Close perineal skin with continuous non-locking subcuticular stitch 1, 4
Avoid locking sutures as they cause excessive tension leading to tissue edema and necrosis 1, 4.
Skin Closure
For midline vertical incisions in obese patients (BMI ≥30), subcuticular 4-0 monofilament suture is equivalent to staples for wound complications but provides superior cosmetic outcomes 5:
- No difference in wound complication rates (32-33%) between techniques 5
- Subcuticular suture results in better cosmetic scores, less scar darkness, and fewer skin marks 5
- BMI, postoperative glucose levels, and smoking are the actual predictors of wound complications, not closure method 5
Suture Material Selection
Optimal Choices
Prioritize slowly absorbable monofilament sutures for all gynecologic closures 1, 3, 2:
- Monofilament materials reduce bacterial seeding and infection risk compared to multifilament 1, 3
- Slowly absorbable sutures (vs rapidly absorbable) decrease incisional hernia rates with high-quality evidence 1
- Consider triclosan-coated sutures (Vicryl Plus) when available, as they reduce surgical site infections (OR 0.62,95% CI 0.44-0.88) 4
Avoid Catgut
Do not use catgut sutures as they are associated with more pain and higher resuturing rates compared to synthetic alternatives 3.
Special Considerations
Subcutaneous Closure in High-Risk Patients
In obese patients undergoing gynecologic malignancy surgery, prophylactic subcutaneous drainage plus subcuticular sutures significantly reduces wound separation compared to staples 6:
- Wound separation rate: 2.5% with drainage/subcuticular sutures vs 8.5% with staples (OR 7.34,95% CI 1.59-33.91) 6
- This technique is particularly protective in obese patients where zero wound separations occurred 6
Peritoneal Closure
Do not close the peritoneum during hysterectomy 2:
- Peritoneal closure provides no outcome benefit 2
- Non-closure reduces operative time 2
- No evidence supports peritoneal closure for preventing adhesions 2
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Never use figure-of-eight sutures for primary fascial or skin closure—reserve this technique exclusively for hemostasis 2
- Avoid interrupted sutures for fascial closure—continuous technique distributes tension more evenly and reduces complications 1
- Do not use large bite technique (>10mm)—this increases incisional hernia risk through tissue devitalization 1
- Never place overly tight sutures—this strangulates tissue and impairs healing 4, 2
- Avoid transcutaneous interrupted sutures on perineal skin—they damage superficial nerve endings causing pain 1, 4