Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Resected Rectal Cancer
Primary Recommendation
Adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended for all patients with stage II/III rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery, with FOLFOX or CAPEOX as preferred regimens for higher-risk patients and 5-FU/LV or capecitabine as acceptable alternatives for lower-risk patients who responded well to neoadjuvant fluoropyrimidine-based therapy. 1
Evidence Quality and Nuances
The evidence supporting adjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer is notably weaker than in colon cancer, creating a challenging clinical scenario. Despite conclusive data being lacking, the NCCN panel recommends adjuvant therapy use based on the totality of available evidence. 1
Supporting Evidence:
- The ADORE trial demonstrated improved 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) with adjuvant FOLFOX versus 5-FU/LV (71.6% vs 62.9%; HR 0.66, P=0.047) 1
- The CAO/ARO/AIO-04 trial showed improved 3-year DFS when oxaliplatin was added to 5-FU in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings (75.9% vs 71.2%; P=0.03) 1
- NCDB analyses of patients achieving pathologic complete response (pCR) found significant overall survival improvement with adjuvant chemotherapy 1
Contradictory Evidence:
- The EORTC 22921 trial showed no overall survival benefit with adjuvant 5-FU chemotherapy, and DFS benefit was not statistically significant (HR 0.91, P=0.29) 1
- A 2017 systematic review of 8 phase III trials concluded data are not robust enough to warrant routine adjuvant therapy 1
- Multiple database studies failed to demonstrate substantial benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy 1
Regimen Selection Algorithm
Choice of adjuvant regimen depends on initial clinical staging and predicted circumferential resection margin (CRM) status: 1
Higher-Risk Patients (FOLFOX or CAPEOX preferred):
- Clinical stage III disease
- Threatened or positive CRM
- T4 tumors
- Extramural vascular invasion
- Tumor deposits
- Node-positive disease 2, 3
Lower-Risk Patients (5-FU/LV or capecitabine acceptable):
- Clinical stage II disease with good response to neoadjuvant therapy
- Patients who responded well to neoadjuvant 5-FU or capecitabine 1
- Patients with significant comorbidities requiring less intensive therapy 2
Timing and Duration
Adjuvant chemotherapy should be initiated as soon as the patient is medically able after surgery, as each 4-week delay results in a 14% decrease in overall survival. 1
Duration recommendations: 1
- 4 months of FOLFOX is justified when preoperative chemoradiotherapy is administered (shorter than the 6-month duration used in colon cancer) 1
- Standard duration for fluoropyrimidine alone remains unclear 1
Special Populations
Patients with Pathologic Complete Response (pCR):
Adjuvant chemotherapy is still recommended even after pCR, despite excellent outcomes in observational studies showing 5-year DFS of 96% and OS of 100% without adjuvant therapy. 1, 4 This recommendation is based on NCDB analyses showing overall survival benefit in pCR patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy 1
MSI-High or dMMR Tumors:
For stage III rectal cancer with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR), immunotherapy with dostarlimab is preferred over standard total neoadjuvant therapy, achieving 100% clinical complete response in evaluable patients without grade 3+ adverse events. 2
Common Pitfalls and Caveats
Underutilization in Practice:
- Only 61.5% to 76.6% of eligible patients receive adjuvant chemotherapy in real-world settings 1
- Factors associated with not receiving adjuvant therapy include: complete pathologic response, infection, no closure of ileostomy/colostomy, advanced age, poor performance status, and socioeconomic factors 1
Oxaliplatin Toxicity:
Oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy is cumulative and dose-limiting; monitor closely and consider dose reduction or discontinuation if grade 2-3 neuropathy develops. 2 Elderly patients and those with significant comorbidities may require dose modifications 2
Patient Selection Considerations:
- Patients who did not receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy (only chemoradiotherapy) should definitely receive adjuvant chemotherapy regardless of surgical pathology results 1
- The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy may be less pronounced in patients who received total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) with both neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy 2, 4
Real-World Effectiveness
Recent observational data suggest that adjuvant chemotherapy provides survival benefit in routine clinical practice. A propensity score-matched analysis demonstrated significantly prolonged disease-free survival with adjuvant treatment (81.8 vs 70.1 months, P<0.001) 5, though the addition of oxaliplatin to adjuvant chemotherapy showed no improvement in DFS in this setting (76.9 vs 79.3 months, P=0.254) 5