Evaluation and Management of a Firm Mass in the Right Upper Leg of a Healthy 30-Year-Old Female
Initial Imaging Approach
Begin with plain radiographs of the right upper leg as the first imaging study, followed by ultrasound for further characterization. 1, 2
- Radiographs serve as the fundamental first step in evaluating any suspected soft-tissue mass, though they may be unrewarding for small, deep-seated, or non-mineralized lesions. 1, 2
- Radiographs can identify intrinsic fat in approximately 11% of soft-tissue masses, detect calcification in 27% of cases, and reveal bone involvement in 22% of cases. 1, 2
- Radiographs may be diagnostic for specific entities such as phleboliths within hemangiomas, osteocartilaginous masses, or peripherally mature ossification of myositis ossificans. 1
Ultrasound Evaluation
Ultrasound is the most useful initial imaging modality for characterizing the mass, with diagnostic accuracy of 94.1% sensitivity and 99.7% specificity for superficial soft-tissue masses. 1, 2, 3
Characteristic Features to Assess:
- For suspected lipoma: Look for hyperechoic or isoechoic appearance compared to surrounding fat, well-circumscribed margins, thin curved echogenic lines within an encapsulated mass, minimal to no internal vascularity on Doppler examination, and no acoustic shadowing. 2, 3
- Red flags requiring advanced imaging: Heterogeneous echotexture, increased vascularity, irregular margins, size >5 cm, deep location (below fascia), or rapid growth. 2, 4, 5
Advanced Imaging Indications
MRI without and with contrast is indicated if the mass demonstrates any concerning features on ultrasound or clinical examination. 2, 4, 5
Specific indications for MRI include:
- Mass size >5 cm in diameter 4, 5
- Deep-seated location (below the fascia) 4, 5
- Rapid growth or sudden presentation without explanation 5
- Pain or tenderness 2, 4
- Atypical ultrasound features (heterogeneous echotexture, increased vascularity, irregular margins) 2, 4
- Diagnostic uncertainty on ultrasound 2
MRI provides superior spatial orientation and can differentiate benign lipomas from atypical lipomatous tumors in up to 69% of cases. 2
Tissue Sampling
Core needle biopsy (preferably ultrasound-guided) is indicated for any mass with suspicious features on imaging or clinical examination. 1, 4, 5
- Core biopsy is superior to fine-needle aspiration in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and correct histological grading. 1
- Image-guided biopsy is preferred over palpation-guided biopsy, allowing confirmation of biopsy accuracy and placement of a marker clip. 1
- If malignancy is suspected, the biopsy tract should be planned for removal during definitive surgery. 4
Management Based on Findings
If imaging shows typical benign features (e.g., classic lipoma):
- Small, superficial, asymptomatic masses with typical imaging features can be observed with clinical follow-up at 6-12 months to assess for growth. 4
- Surgical excision is indicated if the mass is symptomatic, rapidly growing, or if there is patient anxiety. 4
If imaging shows concerning features:
- Expedite referral to orthopedic oncology or a specialist sarcoma multidisciplinary team before performing biopsy if the institution is not equipped for definitive treatment. 1, 4
- Complete surgical excision is the standard treatment for symptomatic, rapidly growing, large (>5 cm), or atypical masses. 4
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not rely on physical examination alone—it correctly identifies only 85% of lipomas, highlighting the necessity of diagnostic imaging. 3
- All deep-seated masses or those in the lower limb should raise concern for atypical lipomatous tumors, even if they appear benign on superficial assessment. 2
- Ultrasound is considerably less accurate for deep masses compared to superficial ones—proceed directly to MRI for deep-seated lesions. 2
- Do not perform biopsy before imaging—complete imaging assessment should precede tissue sampling. 1
- **Soft-tissue sarcomas, though rare (<1% of malignancies), have high mortality rates**—any mass with red flags (>5 cm, deep location, rapid growth, pain) requires urgent evaluation with MRI and potential referral to orthopedic oncology. 1, 5