What is the purpose and interpretation of the valgus knee test in assessing medial collateral ligament (MCL) integrity?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 11, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Valgus Knee Test: Purpose and Interpretation for MCL Assessment

Primary Purpose

The valgus stress test evaluates the integrity of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) by applying a lateral-to-medial force to the knee while stabilizing the femur, which opens the medial joint compartment—increased laxity or pain indicates MCL injury. 1

Test Technique and Grading

The test is performed at two key flexion angles to assess different components of medial stability:

  • At 0° (full extension): Tests the entire medial stabilizing complex including the MCL, posterior capsule, and posteromedial corner 2
  • At 30° flexion: Isolates the superficial MCL (sMCL) by relaxing the posterior capsule, making this the most sensitive position for detecting isolated MCL injury 2, 3

Interpretation of Laxity

  • Grade I injury: Tenderness without increased laxity (microscopic tear) 4
  • Grade II injury: Moderate laxity (5-10mm opening) with a firm endpoint (partial tear) 4
  • Grade III injury: Severe laxity (>10mm opening) without a firm endpoint (complete tear) 5, 4

Critical Diagnostic Caveat

A positive valgus stress test does NOT definitively indicate isolated MCL injury—it can also occur with posterolateral corner injuries, making additional testing essential. 6 The dial test (external rotation test) can be falsely positive with MCL tears, mimicking posterolateral instability. Therefore, always perform both valgus AND varus stress testing to differentiate medial from lateral pathology 6.

Advanced Diagnostic Correlation

Imaging Confirmation

When clinical examination is equivocal or surgical planning is needed:

  • MRI without contrast: Gold standard for MCL assessment, showing significant correlation between percentage of ligament injury on MRI and degree of valgus instability 5, 4
  • Stress ultrasound: Achieves 96% sensitivity and 81% specificity for all MCL tears when medial joint gapping is present during valgus stress 1
  • Valgus stress radiographs: Medial joint vacuum phenomenon is specific for MCL injury and correlates with injury severity 7, 1

Timing Considerations

The American College of Radiology notes that acute hemarthrosis or joint effusion can limit examination accuracy 8. Consider delayed examination (4-5 days post-injury) when initial acute assessment is equivocal, as this timing optimizes test performance 8.

Associated Injuries to Evaluate

MCL injuries frequently occur with concomitant pathology that affects management:

  • ACL tears: Present in combined injuries requiring MRI differentiation 7, 4
  • Deep MCL (dMCL) injury: Combined sMCL and dMCL insufficiency produces excess valgus rotation, external tibial rotation, and anteromedial translation 3
  • Bone contusions: Visible on MRI and predictive of associated soft-tissue injuries 7, 4
  • Meniscal tears: Detected in 5% of MCL injuries on MRI 4

Clinical Decision Algorithm

  1. Perform valgus stress test at 0° and 30° flexion to quantify medial laxity 2, 6
  2. Always include varus stress test to exclude lateral pathology that can mimic MCL injury 6
  3. If Grade II-III laxity or diagnostic uncertainty: Obtain MRI without contrast for definitive diagnosis and surgical planning 1, 5
  4. If immediate MRI unavailable: Stress ultrasound provides 96% sensitivity for MCL tears and can guide acute management 1
  5. Consider valgus stress radiographs when medial joint space opening measurement is needed for surgical decision-making 7, 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.