What are the steps to diagnose von Willebrand disease?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 12, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

How to Diagnose von Willebrand Disease

Diagnose von Willebrand disease using a structured algorithmic approach that begins with a validated bleeding history questionnaire, followed by three mandatory initial laboratory tests (VWF:Ag, VWF:RCo, and FVIII), and then specialized testing based on the pattern of abnormalities. 1, 2, 3

Step 1: Clinical Screening with Structured Bleeding History

Use a validated bleeding assessment tool to systematically evaluate bleeding symptoms, as 80% of specialists rely on these instruments to guide testing decisions. 4 The NHLBI guidelines recommend asking three initial screening questions for asymptomatic patients undergoing surgery, and if any are positive, proceed to a detailed nine-question assessment specifically designed for VWD sensitivity and specificity. 1, 2

Key Bleeding Symptoms to Identify:

  • Mucocutaneous bleeding patterns: epistaxis requiring medical intervention, menorrhagia, easy bruising, prolonged bleeding from minor cuts, gingival bleeding 1, 5, 6
  • Surgical/procedural bleeding: excessive bleeding during dental extractions, tonsillectomy, or other invasive procedures 2, 7
  • Family history of bleeding disorders or similar symptoms 1, 2
  • NSAID use in conjunction with bleeding symptoms 2

Physical Examination Findings:

  • Ecchymoses, hematomas, petechiae, or active bleeding sites 1
  • Signs suggesting alternative diagnoses: jaundice or splenomegaly (liver disease), joint/skin laxity (Ehlers-Danlos), telangiectasias (hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia) 1

Step 2: Initial Laboratory Testing

First-Tier Screening Tests:

Order these tests if bleeding disorder is suspected, though they do not diagnose VWD specifically: 1, 3, 4

  • Complete blood count (CBC) with platelet count and peripheral smear 1, 4
  • Prothrombin time (PT) 1, 4
  • Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) 1, 4

Critical caveat: PT and aPTT alone will miss VWD entirely and should never be relied upon to exclude bleeding disorders. 2, 4 The aPTT may be prolonged in severe VWD due to low FVIII, but is often normal in mild-moderate cases. 1

Mandatory Initial VWD Assays (Grade B Recommendation):

All three tests must be ordered simultaneously for patients with strong mucocutaneous bleeding history: 1, 3

  1. VWF antigen (VWF:Ag): Measures the quantity of VWF protein 1, 3, 8
  2. VWF ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo): Measures VWF functional activity in platelet binding 1, 3, 8
  3. Factor VIII coagulant activity (FVIII): Measures FVIII levels, which are often reduced in VWD 1, 3, 8

Normal reference ranges: 50-200 IU/dL for all three tests 3

Critical Pre-Analytical Considerations:

Sample collection and handling significantly affect results—improper technique leads to false negatives or positives: 1, 3

  • Atraumatic blood draw at room temperature to prevent tissue factor activation 1
  • Minimize patient stress: anxiety, crying, or recent exercise falsely elevate VWF and FVIII levels 1, 3
  • Avoid testing during: acute illness, pregnancy, estrogen/oral contraceptive use—all elevate VWF levels 1, 3
  • Transport samples at room temperature, separate plasma promptly, centrifuge thoroughly to remove platelets 1, 3
  • If testing delayed >2 hours: freeze at ≤-40°C immediately and thaw at 37°C before assay 1, 3
  • Document ABO blood type: Type O individuals have VWF levels 25% lower than other blood groups; African-Americans have higher baseline VWF than Caucasians 1, 3

Step 3: Interpretation of Initial Results

Diagnostic Thresholds:

  • VWF:RCo <30 IU/dL: Definitive diagnosis of VWD 3
  • VWF:RCo 30-50 IU/dL with supportive clinical/family history: Likely VWD, requires repeat testing 3
  • VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratio <0.5-0.7: Suggests Type 2 (qualitative) VWD rather than Type 1 (quantitative deficiency) 1, 3, 4

Important limitation: VWF:RCo has high coefficient of variation (10-30%), so repeat testing is often necessary to confirm abnormal results. 1, 3

If All Initial Tests Are Normal But Bleeding History Remains Strong:

  • Repeat testing on a separate occasion, ensuring optimal pre-analytical conditions 1, 3
  • Consider referral to hemostasis specialist for further evaluation 1

Step 4: Specialized Testing for Subtyping

Order these tests when initial VWD assays show abnormalities or when VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratio is <0.5-0.7: 1, 3, 4

VWF Multimer Analysis:

  • Not for initial screening—technically complex, qualitatively interpreted, used only for subtyping 1, 3, 4
  • Visualizes distribution of VWF multimers to distinguish Type 2A, 2B, 2M subtypes 1, 5, 6
  • Should be performed in specialized laboratories with expertise 1, 6

Additional Specialized Assays:

  • VWF collagen binding (VWF:CB): Alternative functional assay, particularly useful for Type 2 variants 4, 5, 8
  • Ristocetin-induced platelet aggregation (RIPA): Distinguishes Type 2B (increased sensitivity) from other types 1, 7
  • FVIII binding assay: Identifies Type 2N (defective FVIII binding) 1
  • VWF propeptide measurement: Helps identify increased VWF clearance mechanisms 5
  • Genetic sequencing of VWF gene: Confirms diagnosis and guides treatment selection 1, 5

Step 5: Consider Acquired von Willebrand Syndrome (AVWS)

Suspect AVWS if: abnormal VWF results with bleeding symptoms but no personal or family history consistent with hereditary VWD 2

Associated conditions: aortic stenosis (high shear stress causes VWF proteolysis), lymphoproliferative disorders, autoimmune diseases 1

Testing approach: VWF multimer analysis may show isolated loss of high molecular weight multimers even when VWF:RCo is only mildly reduced 1

Common Diagnostic Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Relying on single test results: VWF:RCo assay variability (CV 10-30%) mandates repeat testing for borderline values 1, 3
  • Testing during acute stress or illness: Inflammatory states, pregnancy, and estrogen use falsely normalize VWF levels, masking diagnosis 1, 3
  • Ignoring ABO blood type: Failure to adjust interpretation for Type O patients (naturally lower VWF) leads to overdiagnosis 1, 3
  • Improper sample handling: Room temperature transport and proper centrifugation are non-negotiable—frozen samples must remain frozen until analysis 1, 3
  • Using PT/aPTT to exclude VWD: These tests miss VWD entirely and provide false reassurance 2, 4
  • Ordering VWF multimer analysis as initial test: This specialized test is for subtyping only, not screening 1, 3

When to Refer to Hemostasis Specialist

Immediate referral indicated for: 1

  • Abnormal initial VWD assay results requiring subtyping
  • Strong bleeding history with repeatedly normal tests
  • Suspected AVWS
  • Guidance on repeat testing interpretation
  • Access to specialized assays (multimer analysis, RIPA, genetic testing)

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Diagnosis and Management of Von Willebrand Disease

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Diagnosis of von Willebrand Disease

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Laboratory Workup for Bleeding Patients

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Developments in the diagnostic procedures for von Willebrand disease.

Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH, 2016

Research

Diagnosis or Exclusion of von Willebrand Disease Using Laboratory Testing.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2017

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.