What laboratory tests are used for the diagnosis and management of lymphoma?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 12, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Laboratory Tests for Lymphoma Diagnosis and Management

Complete blood count, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), uric acid, beta-2-microglobulin, protein electrophoresis, and screening for HIV, hepatitis B and C are the essential laboratory tests required for lymphoma evaluation. 1

Initial Diagnostic Laboratory Panel

Mandatory Blood Tests

  • Complete blood count (CBC) with differential to assess for cytopenias, leukocytosis, or abnormal cells 1
  • Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) - critical prognostic marker that reflects tumor burden and cell turnover 1
  • Uric acid - important for assessing tumor lysis syndrome risk, particularly in high tumor burden cases 1
  • Routine blood chemistry including electrolytes, renal function (BUN, creatinine), and liver function tests 1

Strongly Recommended Tests

  • Beta-2-microglobulin (B2M) - independent prognostic factor that correlates with tumor burden and survival 2, 3
  • Protein electrophoresis - recommended for B-cell lymphomas to detect monoclonal proteins 1

Infectious Disease Screening

  • HIV serology - mandatory screening as HIV affects prognosis and treatment selection 1
  • Hepatitis B and C screening - required before initiating immunochemotherapy, particularly rituximab-containing regimens 1

Prognostic Significance of Key Laboratory Markers

LDH as a Prognostic Tool

Elevated LDH is the single most important serologic prognostic marker in lymphoma, incorporated into the International Prognostic Index (IPI) scoring system. 1 LDH levels correlate directly with disease burden, treatment response, and overall survival. 2 Patients with markedly elevated LDH (>2 times normal) have significantly worse outcomes and require more aggressive treatment approaches. 1

Beta-2-Microglobulin

B2M combined with LDH provides superior risk stratification compared to either marker alone. 2, 3 The combination of these two markers can define three distinct prognostic groups with dramatically different outcomes - from 100% survival in low-risk patients to only 26% survival in high-risk patients. 2

Additional Tissue-Based Testing

Bone Marrow Evaluation

  • Bone marrow aspirate and biopsy - required for all patients amenable to curative therapy to complete staging 1
  • Should be repeated at end of treatment only if initially involved 1

Immunohistochemistry Requirements

Minimal mandatory antibody panel includes CD45, CD20, and CD3 on tissue specimens. 1 Optional markers include CD10, BCL-2, and MUM1 for germinal center versus activated B-cell subtype differentiation, though this does not currently influence treatment decisions. 1

Special Circumstances

High-Risk Features Requiring Additional Testing

  • Lumbar puncture with CSF analysis should be considered in high-risk patients (IPI ≥2, bone marrow involvement, testicular involvement, or involvement of spine/skull base) 1
  • First diagnostic spinal tap should be combined with prophylactic intrathecal chemotherapy (cytarabine and/or methotrexate) 1

Cardiac Assessment

  • Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) assessment required before anthracycline-based chemotherapy 1
  • Performance status evaluation mandatory before treatment initiation 1

Monitoring During Treatment

Serial LDH measurements are useful for monitoring disease activity and treatment response, as declining levels correlate with therapeutic efficacy. 4 Repeat imaging and laboratory studies should occur after 2-4 cycles of chemotherapy and after completion of treatment. 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not rely on core needle biopsies alone - excisional lymph node biopsy providing adequate tissue is strongly preferred for accurate diagnosis and immunohistochemistry 1
  • Do not delay infectious disease screening - hepatitis B reactivation can be fatal during rituximab therapy if not identified and managed prophylactically 1
  • Do not ignore mildly elevated LDH - even high-normal LDH levels (compared to low-normal) predict shorter survival regardless of tumor mass 5

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

A new serologic staging system for large-cell lymphomas based on initial beta 2-microglobulin and lactate dehydrogenase levels.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 1989

Guideline

Diagnostic and Treatment Approaches for Elevated Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH)

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.