Is Ofev (nintedanib) or Esbriet (pirfenidone) recommended in the treatment of Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) secondary to scleroderma?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 12, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Ofev (Nintedanib) is Conditionally Recommended for Scleroderma-ILD as First-Line Treatment

For people with systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD), nintedanib (Ofev) is conditionally recommended as a first-line treatment option, while pirfenidone (Esbriet) is conditionally recommended against for all systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease-associated ILD (SARD-ILD), including scleroderma. 1

First-Line Treatment Recommendations

Nintedanib (Ofev) - Conditionally Recommended

  • Nintedanib is specifically conditionally recommended for SSc-ILD as a first-line treatment option based on the 2023 ACR/CHEST guidelines 1
  • The SENSCIS trial demonstrated that nintedanib reduced the annual rate of FVC decline to -52.4 ml/year compared to -93.3 ml/year with placebo (difference of 41.0 ml/year, P=0.04) 2
  • This represents a 44-57% reduction in annual FVC decline, which is clinically meaningful given that a 5% FVC decline over 12 months is associated with approximately 2-fold increased mortality 3

Pirfenidone (Esbriet) - Conditionally Recommended Against

  • For all SARD-ILD patients, including scleroderma, pirfenidone is conditionally recommended against as a first-line treatment option 1
  • This recommendation applies uniformly across all systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases, with no exception made for scleroderma 1
  • The LOTUSS trial only evaluated tolerability of pirfenidone in SSc-ILD but did not demonstrate efficacy, with exploratory disease outcomes remaining largely unchanged 4

Preferred First-Line Options for SSc-ILD

The guideline stratifies treatment options into "preferred" therapies and "additional options" 1:

Preferred Immunosuppressive Agents

  • Mycophenolate, azathioprine, rituximab, and cyclophosphamide are conditionally recommended as first-line treatment options for SARD-ILD, including scleroderma 1
  • Tocilizumab is conditionally recommended specifically for SSc-ILD and MCTD-ILD as a first-line option 1

Glucocorticoids - Strongly Recommended Against

  • For SSc-ILD specifically, glucocorticoids are strongly recommended against as first-line treatment (this is a strong recommendation, not conditional) 1
  • This contrasts with other SARD-ILD where glucocorticoids receive a conditional recommendation for use 1

Combination Therapy Considerations

Avoid Upfront Antifibrotic Combinations

  • Adding nintedanib or pirfenidone to mycophenolate is conditionally recommended against for patients already on mycophenolate without ILD progression 1
  • Upfront combination of nintedanib or pirfenidone with mycophenolate over mycophenolate alone is conditionally recommended against 1

Treatment for Progressive SSc-ILD Despite First-Line Therapy

If SSc-ILD progresses despite initial treatment:

  • Nintedanib is conditionally recommended as a treatment option for SARD-ILD progression, including scleroderma 1
  • Mycophenolate, rituximab, and cyclophosphamide are also conditionally recommended options 1
  • Pirfenidone remains conditionally recommended against for SSc-ILD progression (it is only conditionally recommended for RA-ILD progression) 1
  • Tocilizumab is conditionally recommended for SSc-ILD progression 1
  • Long-term glucocorticoids are strongly recommended against for SSc-ILD progression 1

Safety Profile Considerations

Nintedanib Adverse Events

  • Diarrhea is the most common adverse event, occurring in 75.7% of patients versus 31.6% with placebo 2
  • Gastrointestinal adverse events (diarrhea, nausea, vomiting) are the primary tolerability concern and may require dose reduction or discontinuation 2, 5
  • The safety profile in SSc-ILD is consistent with that observed in IPF patients 2, 5
  • Serious adverse events were infrequent and mostly related to worsening cardiopulmonary involvement of SSc itself 5

Pirfenidone Adverse Events

  • Gastrointestinal symptoms (diarrhea, dyspepsia, vomiting), photosensitivity, and skin rashes are common 6, 4
  • In the LOTUSS trial, 96.8% of SSc-ILD patients experienced treatment-emergent adverse events 4
  • The gastrointestinal and skin adverse events are particularly concerning in scleroderma given the frequent involvement of these organs in the disease itself 4

Rapidly Progressive ILD Exception

  • For patients with rapidly progressive ILD (RP-ILD) associated with scleroderma, both nintedanib and pirfenidone are conditionally recommended against as first-line treatment 1
  • In RP-ILD, pulse intravenous methylprednisolone, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, IVIG, mycophenolate, CNI, and JAK inhibitors are conditionally recommended instead 1

Clinical Decision Algorithm

For newly diagnosed SSc-ILD:

  1. Consider nintedanib as a first-line option alongside immunosuppressive agents (mycophenolate, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, azathioprine) 1
  2. Tocilizumab is an additional first-line option for SSc-ILD 1
  3. Avoid glucocorticoids (strong recommendation against) 1
  4. Do not use pirfenidone 1

For SSc-ILD progression despite first-line therapy:

  1. Add or switch to nintedanib if not already used 1
  2. Consider tocilizumab, mycophenolate, rituximab, or cyclophosphamide 1
  3. Avoid adding pirfenidone 1
  4. Strongly avoid long-term glucocorticoids 1
  5. Consider referral for stem cell transplantation and/or lung transplantation 1

For rapidly progressive SSc-ILD:

  1. Use pulse IV methylprednisolone with combination immunosuppression 1
  2. Avoid both nintedanib and pirfenidone 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.