What are the ECG (electrocardiogram) signs of a pulmonary embolism?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 13, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

ECG Signs of Pulmonary Embolism

The ECG in pulmonary embolism is typically abnormal but highly non-specific, with sinus tachycardia being the most common finding, while classic signs of right ventricular strain (T-wave inversions in V1-V4, S1Q3T3 pattern, and right bundle branch block) are more specific but occur primarily in severe cases. 1, 2

Most Common ECG Findings

Sinus Tachycardia

  • Sinus tachycardia (heart rate >100 bpm) is the single most frequent abnormality, present in approximately 40% of PE cases, though it is entirely non-specific 3, 4
  • In milder cases, sinus tachycardia may be the only detectable ECG abnormality 3

Right Ventricular Strain Pattern (Most Clinically Significant)

  • T-wave inversions in the right precordial leads (V1-V4) are the most clinically significant finding, indicating RV strain and typically found in more severe cases 1, 3
  • These inversions have the highest specificity (97.4%) among ECG findings for PE 3
  • The pattern is usually seen in more severe cases and correlates with the severity of pulmonary hypertension and RV dysfunction 1, 2

Classic Patterns

  • S1Q3T3 pattern (S wave in lead I, Q wave and inverted T wave in lead III) occurs in 8.5% of PE patients versus 3.3% without PE, with a positive likelihood ratio of 3.7 4
  • This pattern was observed in 34 of 51 patients with critical PE in one series 5
  • QR pattern in lead V1 suggests acute RV overload but is uncommon 1, 3

Bundle Branch Block

  • Right bundle branch block (complete or incomplete) occurs in 4.8-9% of PE cases and is associated with RV strain 1, 2, 3
  • Incomplete right bundle branch block has a positive likelihood ratio of 1.7 4

Atrial Arrhythmias

  • Atrial fibrillation and other atrial dysrhythmias occur in 10-23.5% of PE patients 2, 3
  • Non-sinus rhythm is present in 23.5% of PE patients versus 16.6% without PE 4

Diagnostic Limitations and Clinical Context

Poor Standalone Accuracy

  • The ECG cannot diagnose or exclude PE when used in isolation 2, 6
  • Individual ECG findings have limited diagnostic accuracy, with sensitivity of 50-60% and specificity of 80-90% 2
  • A recent 2025 study confirmed that classical ECG findings have minimal standalone diagnostic accuracy and should not be used alone to rule in or rule out PE 6

Primary Role: Exclude Alternative Diagnoses

  • The primary role of ECG is to exclude alternative diagnoses such as acute myocardial infarction, pericarditis, and other cardiac conditions that may present similarly 2, 3
  • ECG should be obtained immediately in suspected PE to rule out acute MI and pericardial disease 2, 3

Clinical Algorithm for ECG Interpretation in Suspected PE

Step 1: Immediate ECG Acquisition

  • Obtain 12-lead ECG immediately upon presentation with suspected PE 2, 3
  • First priority: exclude acute MI, pericarditis, and other cardiac emergencies 2, 3

Step 2: Look for RV Strain Pattern

  • Specifically assess for T-wave inversions in V1-V4, as this has the highest specificity and suggests more severe PE 3
  • Check for S1Q3T3 pattern, right bundle branch block, and QR pattern in V1 3

Step 3: Integration with Clinical Assessment

  • ECG must be used in conjunction with clinical prediction scores (Wells or revised Geneva) rather than in isolation 1, 2, 3
  • The combination of clinical variables with ECG findings allows accurate categorization into probability categories 1

Step 4: Risk Stratification

  • The presence of ≥1 classic RV strain sign is associated with higher adverse event rates 2
  • ECG findings correlate with severity of pulmonary hypertension and RV dysfunction 2

Step 5: Hemodynamic Assessment

  • If hemodynamic instability is present with RV strain on ECG, obtain urgent echocardiography to assess RV function 3
  • In patients with shock or cardiac arrest, echocardiographic findings combined with ECG may be sufficient to guide reperfusion therapy 1

Step 6: Continuous Monitoring

  • Implement continuous ECG monitoring during transport/transfer for suspected PE, especially in high-risk patients 1, 2, 3
  • Major ventricular arrhythmias are uncommon even in critical PE, but monitoring remains essential 5

Important Caveats

  • Up to 20% of patients with PE have completely normal ECG findings 1
  • ECG abnormalities are generally non-specific, with most changes representing ST segment and/or T-wave alterations that can occur in numerous other conditions 2
  • The "septal embolic pattern" was noted in 27 of 51 patients with critical PE, showing a trend toward regression at 48 hours 5
  • Right-sided ECG derivations can increase sensitivity, with 88.1% of PE patients showing at least one abnormality on right-sided ECG 2
  • ECG should be viewed as one component of a structured diagnostic approach that includes clinical probability assessment, D-dimer testing, and definitive imaging 2

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

ECG Changes Associated with Pulmonary Embolism

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

EKG Changes in Pulmonary Embolism

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Electrocardiographic features in critical pulmonary embolism. Results from baseline and continuous electrocardiographic monitoring.

Italian heart journal : official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology, 2004

Research

Classical ECG findings in pulmonary embolism have minimal diagnostic accuracy: A cross-sectional study.

Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.