What biomarkers should be checked for biologic age determination?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 13, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Biomarkers for Biological Age Determination

The most clinically ready biomarkers for biological age determination are DNA methylation-based epigenetic clocks, mitochondrial function measures, and inflammatory markers (particularly IL-6), with DNA methylation clocks showing the strongest evidence for predicting mortality and multimorbidity. 1

Primary Biomarkers Ready for Implementation

DNA Methylation (Epigenetic Clocks)

  • Epigenetic clocks are the most validated and accurate biological age biomarkers currently available, highly correlated with chronological age and predictive of mortality, functional decline, frailty, and brain aging 1
  • DNA methylation profiles showing 3+ years beyond chronological age independently predict cancer mortality and overall mortality 1
  • These measures are stable in stored biological samples and can be assessed from peripheral blood, making them practical for clinical use 1
  • The technology is becoming increasingly cost-effective, though still relatively expensive compared to standard clinical tests 1

Inflammatory Markers

  • IL-6 is the only known cross-sectional and longitudinal predictor of multimorbidity and one of the strongest predictors of incident mobility loss and disability 1
  • Inflammation represents a central pillar of aging, as all hallmarks of aging directly or indirectly cause inflammatory states 1
  • Higher inflammatory marker levels are associated with frailty, functional decline, cognitive decline, and death 1
  • These markers are readily available in clinical laboratories and can be modified by interventions 1

Mitochondrial Function

  • Mitochondrial function measures are ready for implementation based on multiple epidemiological studies 1
  • These biomarkers reflect core cellular energy metabolism changes that occur with aging 1

Secondary Biomarkers with Emerging Evidence

Cellular Senescence Markers (p16INK4a)

  • p16INK4a expression reflects cellular senescence and shows dramatic changes after cancer treatments, with breast cancer chemotherapy causing biological aging equivalent to 14-17 years in the first 12 months 1
  • Anthracycline-based regimens cause significantly greater aging (23-26 years) compared to non-anthracycline regimens (9-11 years) 1
  • High-throughput methods for measuring senescence in T lymphocytes, skin, and intramuscular fat are becoming available 1
  • Currently not available in clinical laboratories, limiting immediate practical application 1

Autophagy Measures

  • Autophagy measures are routinely used in mammalian studies and should be applicable to humans 1
  • These biomarkers require further refinement before widespread clinical implementation 1

Biomarkers NOT Currently Recommended

Telomere Length

  • Telomere length is NOT useful for measuring biological age at this stage due to excessive noise and wide longitudinal variations that cannot be explained by health events 1
  • While telomere length has biological plausibility and tracks with chronological age, results have been inconsistent for survivorship outcomes 1
  • New methods focusing on DNA damage response (marker of critical telomere shortening) may yield better results in the future 1

Important Clinical Considerations

Composite Approach

  • No single measure represents an exhaustive assessment of biological aging; aggregate measures leveraging multiple biomarkers are needed 1
  • The hallmarks of aging are interconnected, with failure of one mechanism leading to impairment in others 1
  • Combining biomarkers with clinical history and geriatric assessments may provide the most comprehensive assessment 1

Key Limitations and Caveats

  • Different manifestations of biological aging may occur on different time schedules, with some mechanisms preceding others 1
  • Further research is needed before routine clinical implementation, including determining when knowledge of biological age would change treatment decisions 1
  • Body composition markers also show promise but require additional validation 1

Practical Implementation

  • For immediate clinical use, prioritize DNA methylation testing (if available and affordable) combined with IL-6 measurement 1
  • In cancer patients specifically, consider p16INK4a expression if available, as it shows strong treatment-related changes 1
  • Avoid relying on telomere length alone given current measurement limitations 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.