Tigecycline for MRSA Infections
Tigecycline is FDA-approved and effective for treating MRSA complicated skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTI), but it is NOT a first-line agent and should be reserved for situations when alternative treatments are not suitable due to an increased all-cause mortality risk. 1
FDA-Approved Indications for MRSA
Tigecycline is specifically indicated for:
- Complicated skin and skin structure infections caused by methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in patients ≥18 years old 1
- Complicated intra-abdominal infections caused by MRSA (among other organisms) in patients ≥18 years old 1
The standard dosing is 100 mg initial dose, followed by 50 mg IV every 12 hours over 30-60 minutes, for 5-14 days depending on infection type 1
Critical Limitations and Black Box Warning
The FDA has issued a Black Box Warning for tigecycline due to increased all-cause mortality (0.6% absolute risk difference, 95% CI 0.1-1.2) observed in meta-analyses of clinical trials. 1
Key restrictions include:
- NOT indicated for hospital-acquired or ventilator-associated pneumonia due to greater mortality and decreased efficacy in comparative trials 1
- NOT indicated for diabetic foot infections after a clinical trial failed to demonstrate non-inferiority 1
- Should NOT be used for MRSA bacteremia due to low plasma concentrations and poor performance in bacteremic patients 2, 3
- Should be reserved only when alternative treatments are not suitable 1
Position in MRSA Treatment Guidelines
The 2011 IDSA MRSA guidelines do NOT list tigecycline among recommended agents for most MRSA infections 4:
- For hospitalized patients with complicated SSTI, preferred options are: vancomycin (A-I), linezolid (A-I), daptomycin 4 mg/kg IV daily (A-I), telavancin (A-I), and clindamycin (A-III) 4
- Tigecycline is notably absent from these primary recommendations despite FDA approval 4
For intra-abdominal infections, tigecycline is listed as an option for mild-to-moderate community-acquired infections, but concerns exist about its very broad spectrum and potential to drive resistance 4
Clinical Efficacy Data
When tigecycline has been studied for MRSA:
- Phase 3 trial data showed comparable cure rates to vancomycin for MRSA infections: 81.4% vs 83.9% in microbiologically evaluable patients, and 75.0% vs 81.8% in modified intent-to-treat populations 5
- For MRSA complicated skin infections specifically, cure rates were similar: 86.4% with tigecycline vs 86.9% with vancomycin 5
- Gastrointestinal adverse effects (nausea/vomiting) occurred more frequently with tigecycline (41.0%) compared to vancomycin (17.9%), though most were mild 5
- Pooled analysis of 378 MRSA soft tissue infections showed comparable efficacy between tigecycline and vancomycin regardless of community-acquired MRSA designation, SCCmec type, or PVL status 6
When Tigecycline Might Be Considered
Tigecycline may have a role in specific scenarios:
- Polymicrobial complicated skin infections involving MRSA plus anaerobes and gram-negatives, when broader coverage is needed (excluding diabetic foot) 7
- Complicated intra-abdominal infections with MRSA, where tigecycline achieves high peritoneal penetration 4
- Multidrug-resistant infections when other options have failed or are contraindicated, though consultation with infectious disease specialists is recommended 8
- Bone infections caused by multidrug-resistant MRSA when MIC ≤2 mg/L, as tigecycline penetrates bone tissue effectively 2
Combination Therapy Considerations
- Animal model data suggests tigecycline alone was the least effective monotherapy for MRSA foreign-body infections 9
- Combining tigecycline with rifampin improved efficacy and prevented rifampin resistance emergence in animal models, though clinical data in humans is limited 9
- Recent research shows isoniazid may potentiate tigecycline's killing activity against MRSA, though this remains investigational 10
Practical Algorithm for Decision-Making
Use tigecycline for MRSA only when:
- Patient has complicated SSTI or intra-abdominal infection (NOT pneumonia, NOT bacteremia, NOT diabetic foot) 1
- AND first-line agents (vancomycin, linezolid, daptomycin) are contraindicated, unavailable, or have failed 4
- AND infection is NOT associated with bacteremia 2, 3
- AND MIC to tigecycline is ≤2 mg/L if known 2, 3
- AND patient can tolerate gastrointestinal side effects 5
Monitor closely for: nausea/vomiting (very common), liver function abnormalities, and clinical response given mortality concerns 1, 5